Manticore
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2009
- Messages
- 10,115
- Reaction score
- 114
- Country
- Location
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh really? Source?
Photoshop, posted here again and again on phantasy.
hey bro, can you tell me what is the progress of JF-17 block iii ? and what will be its price ?
There is no progress apart from basic concepts. At this point there is no finalized configuration and hence no final price. That being said, there is very little chance of it being "stealthy" as is shown in such fantasy photoshops.
There is no progress apart from basic concepts. At this point there is no finalized configuration and hence no final price. That being said, there is very little chance of it being "stealthy" as is shown in such fantasy photoshops.
Damn, we have big interest in JF-17
yara it's a waste of money , why use AESA when the KLJ-7 has 100km + range and the AWACS can share data with JFT ?What of an AESA integration, fitting in the cooling unit would be dicey with the amount of space, no?
yara it's a waste of money , why use AESA when the KLJ-7 has 100km + range and the AWACS can share data with JFT ?
We have the Saab 2000 Erieye and KJ-200 !!!Range is not what sets an AESA apart. Otherwise there are perhaps 2 or so A-ESA sensors that can "outrange" the bars and yet the MKI upgrade includes an AESA.
We have the Saab 2000 Erieye and KJ-200 !!!
What of an AESA integration, fitting in the cooling unit would be dicey with the amount of space, no?
We have the Saab 2000 Erieye and KJ-200 !!!
so we're looking at some major changes in the airframe specially the nose and the fuselage ?The cooling is the only issue keeping AESA integration from happening. The radar is there, the power for it is there.. just no space to fit the cooling.