ziaulislam
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 23,621
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
BVR isnt the only thing. there are other roles as well. He was referring to the aircraft as whole.@niaz
Pretty much agreed with your analysis.
If we want to have a clear picture of JF17 standing we should compare it with the aircrafts which it is going to replace.
Previously our mainstay aircrafts were Mirages, A5, F7s? Out of these no one was able to fire BVR? Air-refueling? Data-linking with AWACS? Mission specific pods? May be..
How much percentage wise JF17 has increase the capability of PAF is the right question. I can safely say that if PAF replaces all its Mirages and A5s with JF17 it increases the overall capability of PAF with atleast 80%.
On question of pitching JF17 against MKIs. Its somewhat tricky. BVR combat is not simple as its seem. On home sky, with backing of AWACS and Ground radars+decent package of BVR+Radar, JF17 can give headache to MKIs.
Its debatable as we dont know where does JF17 fits in the larger operational planning of PAF.
And if in couple of years time PAF could snatch an AESA deal for JF17, we may never know....
obviously su 30 outclass jf-17 in some rules like strike operations and range