JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

[Luftwaffe]

Don't you guys think SD-10 seems to very close to the ground? (Note the fins specifically). What will be the chances of getting hit when JF-17 takes off or lands?

Watch this video, you need not worry. Missiles/Fuel Tanks are safe.

 

[Armstrong]

Don't you guys think SD-10 seems to very close to the ground? (Note the fins specifically). What will be the chances of getting hit when JF-17 takes off or lands?

Sainn tou Sainnn sadeiii Buttt Sahib veee Saiiin !

Yaaraa the blokes at PAC Kamra or in China aren't exactly amateurs to not have kept that in mind.

 

[Edevelop]

-
Yes my dear, It gona hurt alot people here but reality is that PT-6 is Block-2.
you can add an IRST & IFR probe in it any time, (i still doubt about IRST in Block-2 but let see time is near.)

Umm.... but this is really confusing:

The pic here is comparing 04 to 06:

However, the 04 here is looking exactly like 06 (Note the EW sensors on the tail)

 

[Armstrong]

Buttt Sahib I'm not sure if its a block 2...for surely if it flew back in 2006 then it definitely wasn't a block 2 !

 

[Kompromat]

PT-06 ain't block II. They may well be testing some on board systems though.

 

[Windjammer]

This head shot gives you a good idea of JF-17s ground clearance, even the centre line tank is well out of harms way.

 

[hk299792458]

FC-1 (JF-17) Prototype 06 in Chengdu, with two PL-12 (??)...

We can also see J-10A and J-20 as well.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Its about time we heard about the second , locally produced Fighter Jet in Pakistan

 

[DANGER-ZONE]

Buttt Sahib I'm not sure if its a block 2...for surely if it flew back in 2006 then it definitely wasn't a block 2 !

PT-6 flew in 2006 ?
It surfaced in 2008-9 on internet how come it flew back in 2006 ? I really dont wana debate on this matter just to prove that something iam claiming is RIGHT !
Time will tell PT-6 or a little physically modified version of it will be Block-2, time is near. let see

 

[Kompromat]

Block II ?

 

[VCheng]

Block II ?

Looks like a two-seater to me.

 

[mylovepakistan]

Block II ?

ehhh....11 harpoints ???

looks fake...

how come jf 17 block II have 11 hardpoints with either upgraded RD-93 or WS-13A???

 

[graphican]

ehhh....11 harpoints ???

looks fake...

how come jf 17 block II have 11 hardpoints with either upgraded RD-93 or WS-13A???

Its pretty detailed.. shouldn't be work of some fan-boy.

Other than hard-points, it also has a second antenna on the dorsal, some additional components towards the tail and same nose cone. If that was fan boy's work, he must had thought about adding some AESA and given an angle to the nose.

may be it was a proposal image or twin-seat configuration but it looks a genuine technical drawing to me.

 

[Bratva]

prototype 09.... Interesting!

 

[DANGER-ZONE]

Block II ?

Its pretty detailed.. shouldn't be work of some fan-boy.

Other than hard-points, it also has a second antenna on the dorsal, some additional components towards the tail and same nose cone. If that was fan boy's work, he must had thought about adding some AESA and given an angle to the nose.

may be it was a proposal image or twin-seat configuration but it looks a genuine technical drawing to me.

Thread:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/jf-17-thunder/68207-jf-17-thunder-multirole-fighter-thread-4-a-178.html

Post 1: http://www.defence.pk/forums/jf-17-...irole-fighter-thread-4-a-178.html#post1975953
Post 2: http://www.defence.pk/forums/jf-17-...irole-fighter-thread-4-a-178.html#post1975956

Reply of Chinese Friend:http://www.defence.pk/forums/jf-17-...irole-fighter-thread-4-a-178.html#post1976282

this Painter's name is Tomcat21 who is a famous CG master in CDF.His CG will be of great reference value about JFT (2-Seater).

also,he is making V-head JFT PT's CG now.