What's new

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sir,
Please explain ^ , what is this ,

this is what i thought a year back

''
H-2 is a AGM, [perhaps version of raptor 1/2]while H-4 is the BVRAAM with 120KM range


H-4 test was definitly a BVR AAM.120km range [paf indeginous T-Darter version?] integrated with the Mirage's Grifo M radar

''

but looking at the above pic , the roles might be the other way round -- i would appreciate it if some one clears it!
 
.
this is what i thought a year back

''
H-2 is a AGM, [perhaps version of raptor 1/2]while H-4 is the BVRAAM with 120KM range


H-4 test was definitly a BVR AAM.120km range [paf indeginous T-Darter version?] integrated with the Mirage's Grifo M radar

''

but looking at the above pic , the roles might be the other way round

You want to say H-2 is not AGM but a BVR AAM?
 
.
this is what i thought a year back

''
H-2 is a AGM, [perhaps version of raptor 1/2]while H-4 is the BVRAAM with 120KM range


H-4 test was definitly a BVR AAM.120km range [paf indeginous T-Darter version?] integrated with the Mirage's Grifo M radar

''

but looking at the above pic , the roles might be the other way round -- i would appreciate it if some one clears it!

H-2 and H-4 both are Air to Ground weapons. i dont think they are BVR-AAM
 
.
This board is full of thread about all sorts of aircraft - but for me the JFT is the most interesting - of course I am biased because I think Pakistani engineers and workers have been presented with an incredible opportunity to learn and institutionalize the know how, I really do think that this is a quantum leap in the exposure to industrial process and engineering now how, at least for Pakistanis.
 
.
H-2 and H-4 both are Air to Ground weapons. i dont think they are BVR-AAM

reality is that there is much confusion..
but there are two claims
1.h2 and h4 are air to ground stand off
2. h2 is BVR air to air while h4 is stand off weapon.

although many renowned members are in favour of second claim i think its most likly to be A2G
 
. .
any 1 tell about air refueling of jf-17 thunder and twin seater variant
 
.
any 1 tell about air refueling of jf-17 thunder and twin seater variant
twin seat variant is rumored to be worked upon but there is no credible info regarding its status
regarding refueling the block2 will have a fixed re fueling probe
 
.
when block 1 dilvery will be compelted i head that 26 block 1 has been dilvered to PAF at the month of Aug 2011 is that true???
 
. .
can Any one post a compendium of what is the progress JF-17 program achieve in last one month . ?
i missed more then a month . :hitwall:
 
.
can Any one post a compendium of what is the progress JF-17 program achieve in last one month . ?
i missed more then a month . :hitwall:

Nothing much. Just Pakistan Aeronautical Complex at Kamra has finished the 26th locally made JF-17.
JF-17 is being tested with WS-13 and rest chit chat was on Chaffs and flares of JF-17.

Moreover, BVR pictures were posted.
 
.
can Any one post a compendium of what is the progress JF-17 program achieve in last one month . ?
i missed more then a month . :hitwall:

last month they test BVRs i think and 50 more coming from china urgently and we troll on thread lolz
 
.
last month they test BVRs i think and 50 more coming from china urgently and we troll on thread lolz

can Any one post a compendium of what is the progress JF-17 program achieve in last one month . ?
i missed more then a month . :hitwall:

Here from our new Researcher, ANTIBODY:
Following are some updates by eaglehannon





Confirmed: The 50 new jets will be Block 2 JF-17s. The structure parts will be flown to Chinese for final avionics and testing assembly. Unlike the first block where all avionics were assembled at Kamra. I think thats why Media is confusing "Made in China". The reason is new radar readied by Nanjing Institute with complex assembly procedures. Sensor suit is an upgrade and all Chinese.
I am not sure about this emergency bases thing in Media. I think its wrong news. but I have not confirmed it. This posted info is from a senior person as our ordinary pilots an engineers can not comment on anything as such for obvious reasons. I dont write any account of interaction with them as there has earlier been an incident of disclosure some times back and the blamed person had to bear consiquences (I was not party in that. Someone here was he knows it)

Confirmed: Current block 1s will not be upgraded. It will be replaced by block2s at the end of 150 jets. A new squadern will be raised for the sole purpose of training foreign buyers of this aircraft and rest of the examples will move to CCS to replace ageing Aircrafts. Block 2 might be the last version of JF-17s. The block2 radar (will disclose name and improvements once I get a nod from someone senior... or not) shall be the standard radar for all JF-17s. Improvements will all be based on this standard version. Block 1 radar carrying planes are exception.

Confirmed: FC-20's 90% pending issues are finished. The wings are slightly modified and are composite structures (above 50%). Canard foreplane's hight is slightly changed.
I am sure the tactics for this plane are already in place and this Aircraft will see front lines immediately on induction (my estimate: this years end or starting mid next year). FC-20 is a excellent platform as per pilots. Confirmed by the ones who did it, it does perform that SU30's famous manuver and recovers much faster than it.

Confirmed: SD-10B is already inducted. Numbers are being made up. It is indeed confirmed that side by side performance comparissons put it on par with Aamram120c5s. All JF-17s and FC20s will carry it for next 5 years before a new version is presented. (Confirmed existance of a NG Medium range missile programe by Chinese for their stealth version). The Meteor is out of equation as vendor will now allow integration with Chinese platorms.

From a Chinese source: There is still a posibility of J-11B with russian engine for PK Navy. I said it before in 2009. PAF comment was, its all dependant on WS10 engine which may be common in FC20 and J11B. I wish it materialize as I have heard it over and again by senior navy officers. Surface assets are vulnerable to attack. I remember posting a detailed conversation with a senior navy officer some times ago.

Inshallah will post the postables from my recent interactions as I find time.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom