Khan Sahib,
First of all why are your post so long winded, unfocused, with personal attacks and why it is your perogative to set the rules in a public forum? I follow the the rules of the forum and the admins and I have the same rights as anyone else. In a public forum age or number of posts are of no consequence. It is what you write and the case you make.
As far as the BVR missiles are concerned SD-10/PL12 become operational with PLAAF in 2007 so your statement about it being in development is incorrect. It has an operational range of 70KM and it is claimed to be more manoeuvrable than the Russian R-77. Vympel R77, which is the longest range BVR with IAF has a published range of around 80 KM so not much difference. Neither have been tested in real combat so their is no independent verification of the kill ratio. In any case, there is a lot of difference in published range and effective range. Russians are known to be a little aggressive in promoting their products. In reality most effective BVR engagements are likely to be in the 30 KM range. Now coming to your alleged PAF shenghians. If Pakistan had given up its nuclear program in the 80s, it would be sitting on hundreds of top of line Americans fighters of our choice. However, we choose to go for the nuclear option, which in my opinion, was the right thing to do, and becuase of that we had to compromise on our fighter procurements. We had very few options and what PAF was able to do with all the sanctions and very limited resources is comendable rather than subject to criticism. Mirage 2000s would have been a bad and very expensive choice and would not have given PAF any significant BVR capability i.e. Matra super 530 has a maximum range of 35 KM and much shorter effective range. Case is point is Taiwan, where Mirage 2000s are being mothballed. If there were better optiosn available to the PAF during that period please enlighten us. Remember defence has to be seen in context of all resources available and not simply one weapon system versus another. No doubt IAF currently has a BVR advantage and have had one for some years but it does not mean that India can simply walk over Pakistan. The reasons for it is other elements in our overall defence profile, otherwise they would have attacked us after the Parliament or the Mumbai episode.
Also your statement that IAF has 200 BVR capable aircrafts is incorrect. Currently they have less than hundred SU 30MKIs with Vympels. I am not undermining IAF threat, but they have their own issues and for starters they lack an effective primary or basic trainer because all their Deepaks are grounded and their Kirans are not doing too well either and no replacement is in sight. The much hyped MRCA procurement is years behind schedule. Best nothing is said about the LCA. The IAF situation is like this: LCA was mean't to replace the Migs 21S and 27s, but the LCA was delayed so they came up with the MRCA as an interim solution, but then the MRCA got delayed so they are buying more SU30MKIs as an interim solution. SU30 looks very good on the paper but it is a nightmare to maintain and operate.
Please do your homework, before you start putting other people down.