TaimiKhan
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 8,956
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
The radar antenna at 1:16 looks quiet big, i thought it was smaller, but if compared to the size of people standing nearby, it seems quiet big.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are ignoring the engine diameter.... and the intake shape is not quite Y like it is more like U at the point of intake... while blade part is large diameter.Even if the air intakes would be bigger, the engine blades shouldn't be visible, all actual single engine fighters uses S-, or Y-ducts before the engine and I guess that is not different with JF 17 or (maybe someone has a cutaway, or graphic that shows it)?
Ok.. Thanks for acknowledging that... and JF-17 beat SU-30 in these parameters.. quite comprehensively.However, that is only one part of the RCS, other points like size of the fighter, integrated RAM-, or other materials are important too.
You are ignoring the engine diameter.... and the intake shape is not quite Y like it is more like U at the point of intake... while blade part is large diameter.
Ok.. Thanks for acknowledging that... and JF-17 beat SU-30 in these parameters.. quite comprehensively.
As now we can see which radar we are producing... Can you confirm its domestic production of KLJ 7 or some other radar.The radar antenna at 1:16 looks quiet big, i thought it was smaller, but if compared to the size of people standing nearby, it seems quiet big.
As now we can see which radar we are producing... Can you confirm its domestic production of KLJ 7 or some other radar.