Kompromat
ADMINISTRATOR
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 40,366
- Reaction score
- 416
- Country
- Location
An US HMD with Chinese radar and avionics? Any reliable source for that?
French or Chinese not US.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An US HMD with Chinese radar and avionics? Any reliable source for that?
Interesting isn't it?
Actually the chinese PL-8 was a ditto copy of Python 3 but later it was improved a little and named PL-9
Yea i know
But now PL-9 is a mature weapon system and has been tested many times.
All i wana see is a JHMS
French or Chinese not US.
^^
Sir by having flash lights, what does it mean ?
You answered it yourself. Yes, any missile can be integrated with any radar provided you have the source codes for the radar and the missile.
Fortunately you can get the radar source codes. But unfortunately you, or for that matter, no country other than US has source codes for AMRAAM missile.
Hence, AIM-120 can not be integrated with a chinese radar.
AIM-120 missiles are for F-16 and not JF-17.
I would agree with him, because if PAF had planed that from the beginning, why bother with 50 JF 17 with Chinese techs anyway? They could have made the deal with France long before and the first 150 JF 17 would get the French package. Also if PAF would believe the Chinese radar is comparable, why not simply add some western techs (like French EWS, or some weapons) to it and not buy a complete new package? That would have reduced the costs pretty much, because of higher numbers, but less techs and easier logistics.
Are you making any sense? absolutely no. First you raise objections over the quality of the Chinese radars by raising the issue that PAF isnt satisfied with Chinese avionics and hence they were looking for French and other posters have tried to correct you on that the reason was not because PAF WASNT SATISFIED with Chinese avionics but because they were more interested to maybe use a battle tested BVR missile on the JF-17 since it is going to form the back bone of PAF and its integration is only possible with a western radar as US will not give its source codes to Chinese. You have taken a complete 180 degree turn and have started talking about equipping AMRAAM to a chinese radar where as this wasnt the point of argument in the 1st place. So what exactly are you implying here and how is it related to the quality of Chinese avionics?
Yes, that's more realistic, but you said JHMCS and that's the name of the US HMD, that's why I asked.
JHMCS is a trade mark owned by Boeing ?
I haven't taken any u turns.
I still believe the same. There are some other members who believed AMRAAM could be integrated with KLJ-7. I was clearing their doubts.
Chinese avionics are still very basic and nothing when compared to Russian, French, German, US, UK, Italian avionics. That is the reason PAF is changing them.
Again you are making the same flawed assumption based on nothing substantial but your own perceived/prejudice mind. Let me say is again this is not the reason why PAF is changing them. Chinese have made tremendous progress in terms of avionics and in no way are less equivalent to their western counterparts.
Again this can't be the reason, because if PAF would fear sanctions, they would buy higher numbers of the sanction prove package, but PAF is doing the direct opposite with buying twice the numbers of JF with western parts. Of course France might be more reliable than others, but the most sanctionprove solution remains to be Chinese and all other western possibilities would only increase the risk during sanctions.Are you forgetting that long before Pakistan happened to be under Sanctions and so it was only logical to peruse something that was sanction prove but as soon as those sanctions were lifted PAF again began to look for alternatives...
If chinese avionics are good, why are they being replaced for over a billion dollars? Give me a believable reason.