Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sometimes our speculations just goes way beyond reality...
^^ why would PAF want to retire out current thunders in 4-5 years? (or whenever the production get completed)
sometimes our speculations just goes way beyond reality...
^^ why would PAF want to retire out current thunders in 4-5 years? (or whenever the production get completed)
First of all it does not make sense to retire new airframes in less then a decade while it would be beneficial to replace F-7PGs in the first place, alot of inconsistencies.
im not sure about the aesa in blk2--- the general atmoshphere in chinese fora wasnt believing the authenticity of this rumour atleast a couple of weeks earlier , according to them , aesa might not be in even j10b at the moment , then how come its been developed for jft blk2 and to be delivered 50 units with aesa within this year
sometimes our speculations just goes way beyond reality...
^^ why would PAF want to retire out current thunders in 4-5 years? (or whenever the production get completed)
^^bro.you are right.im not sure about the aesa in blk2--- the general atmoshphere in chinese fora wasnt believing the authenticity of this rumour atleast a couple of weeks earlier , according to them , aesa might not be in even j10b at the moment , then how come its been developed for jft blk2 and to be delivered 50 units with aesa within this year
Razgriz, my man i posted wat i got for the sake of sharing information ,so every1 has a chance to get their hands on each n every bit of info regarding jf-17 been available anywhere, i thought of eagle hannan to be credible enough source to quote him , its not me rather many other well informed sources also take his words seriously
He came up with many significant things regarding jf-17 a year or so ago and those words also proved to be accurate to certain extent,
i appreciate that you're sharing info with us on thunders and im not doubting anyone's credibility.
i was just saying that retiring the new airframes is .......weird and it doesn't sound like.... "PAF-ish". u know how long PAF uses aircrafts untill they start to fall apart lol.
@ this is in reply to a commenter who stated there is no in between stage between stealth and conventional plane
If we hide the signatures well enough it confuses the radar operator into assuming that its not a fighter plane but only a small bird or balloon or non threat - so there is a in between why would americans build silent eagle and sell it to Saudia if it did not work
Had you read my reply you woul've known. Btw the OCU and the foreign pilot training squadrons were told about by eagle hannan.i appreciate that you're sharing info with us on thunders and im not doubting anyone's credibility.
i was just saying that retiring the new airframes is .......weird and it doesn't sound like.... "PAF-ish". u know how long PAF uses aircrafts untill they start to fall apart lol.
i appreciate that you're sharing info with us on thunders and im not doubting anyone's credibility.
i was just saying that retiring the new airframes is .......weird and it doesn't sound like.... "PAF-ish". u know how long PAF uses aircrafts untill they start to fall apart lol.
2. Comprehensive upgrades for low RCS profile including cockpit glass, RAM paint, refined structure, completely new nose structure for AESA, significant increase in the use of composites and retractable refueling probe.
Azad Pakistan , look like you don't know ABC of Stealth... Let me educate you once again...
1. External weapon contribute 3-4 Sq M RCS. Even If you can bring down RCS of JF17 to 0.1 Sq M, fully loaded FC1 will have RCS of 3-4 Sq M.
2. F15 silent eagle is huge plane (Size of Su30), It can carry only 4 missile under its internal weapon bay (If only Internal weapon bay is used), How much a small plane like FC1 or LCA can carry in its Internal bay?? one missile?? One missile can not Guarantee kill.
3. With every country going AESA, its difficult for LO Aircraft to remain stealth.
4. I have just talked bout Frontal RCS, I have not yet talked bout IR signature and other RCS.
The Moral of the story is:
1. Stealth/VLO FC1 is myth and useless.
2. Pakistan must start new project to develop a stealth fighter (from scratch)
3. Experiments on LO JF17 is good for Pakistan R&D sector, they must do it. But ppl like you must not boast on capability of it.
4,. R&D work never go waste, even if you fail, you will get enormous knowledge.
5. Pakistan have china, Pakistan must learn as much possible from china, no one know what will happen in future.