Thats what reported, if you read in chinese reports and they look to me credible.That seems fishy to me honestly, repeatedly lightning strike?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats what reported, if you read in chinese reports and they look to me credible.That seems fishy to me honestly, repeatedly lightning strike?
All Chinese big rockets are all liquid fuel including the rocket for manned mission.well a majority of Chinese SLV's are solid chemical rockets so no real surprise.
If I'm right all Chinese manned missions have been powered by solid rockets so far.
I'm not saying this is wrong or right. Just saying solid fuelled rockets are less complex and therefore more reliable. The only down side is environmental pollution.
2011 was over a decade ago, afte that Japan's bullet trains suffered several derailments, and you have to keep in mind the scale of HSR systems in different countries, same as rocket launching, if you launch 100 rockets, the chance of some failure will certainly multiply than if you just launch one.All HSR/Shinkansen incidents in Japan are related to earthquake, and none of them have resulted in any casualties.
Wenzhou line was considered a HSR at the time, and it was one of the biggest HSR accident in the 2010s.
No, they don't.2011 was over a decade ago, afte that Japan's bullet trains suffered several derailments, and you have to keep in mind the scale of HSR systems in different countries, same as rocket launching, if you launch 100 rockets, the chance of some failure will certainly multiply than if you just launch one.
Oh yeah, the good Americans just dont care about their own astronauts safety when launching rockets, but opted for the lofty goal of saving the humanity from enviromental pollution, how self serving and hypocritical. If you Americans are so concerned with pollutions, why dont you start drastically reduce your per captia carbon emissions in US.well a majority of Chinese SLV's are solid chemical rockets so no real surprise.
If I'm right all Chinese manned missions have been powered by solid rockets so far.
I'm not saying this is wrong or right. Just saying solid fuelled rockets are less complex and therefore more reliable. The only down side is environmental pollution.
Japan doesn't have much HSR to start with, in HSR, China is in her own league, several times larger than the rest of world combined.No, they don't.
Japan Shinkansen never had any major accident, and the last train-related accident that Japan was in 2004. This year they have some earthquakes, but the train was stopped in place with no casulaties or injuries.
Maybe you are thinking of Taiwan, which did have an accident with high casualties using Japanese trains recently.
Oh yeah, the good Americans just dont care about their own astronauts safety when launching rockets, but opted for the lofty goal of saving the humanity from enviromental pollution, how self serving and hypocritical. If you Americans are so concerned with pollutions, why dont you start drastically reduce your per captia carbon emissions in US.
Apparently you are wrong then, all chinese rockets use liquids as fuel except one new model, dont talk of nonsense when you have no idea of chinese space tech.well a majority of Chinese SLV's are solid chemical rockets so no real surprise.
If I'm right all Chinese manned missions have been powered by solid rockets so far.
I'm not saying this is wrong or right. Just saying solid fuelled rockets are less complex and therefore more reliable. The only down side is environmental pollution.
All Chinese big rockets are all liquid fuel including the rocket for manned mission.
India's rocket however are almost all solid fuel.
I'm talking about manned mission. I am aware LM5 through 8 are LOX / KeroseneApparently you are wrong then, all chinese rockets use liquids as fuel except one new model,
China's new powerful solid rocket engine conducts test run
China successfully conducted a test run of its new huge solid rocket booster engine in Xi'an, northwest China's Shaanxi Province, on Wednesday.news.cgtn.com
LM-2F manned rated SLV is all liquid fuel.The operational Long March 5 through 8 LOX/Kerosene SLV have never been used for manned space flights. So far all Chinese manned missions have been solid motor but this is likely to change soon.
I don't think India has a manned SLV and I don't know much about their space program so can't comment about their SLVs.
I'm talking about manned mission. I am aware LM5 through 8 are LOX / Kerosene
nope the main engine stage 1 and 2 are UDMH/N2O4 solid fuelledLM-2F manned rated SLV is all liquid fuel.
UDMH/N204 is liquid fuel.nope the main engine stage 1 and 2 are UDMH/N2O4 solid fuelled
the four strap on boosters are liquid fuelled.
Japan has like the 3rd most HSR per country per your charts, I don't see why it doesn't have much. Hell, my country has no HSR rail at all.Japan doesn't have much HSR to start with, in HSR, China is in her own league, several times larger than the rest of world combined.