What's new

Japanese media: China to buy S400 to deter Taiwan and Japan and India

Aarush

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
United States
Japan’s “diplomatic scholar” magazine website on April 11 quoted a Russian commercial television reported that Putin has approved the sale to China of two to four sets of S-400 air defense missile system. The deal is already in negotiations among, if approved, would allow China to become the first foreign customers this advanced defense systems. At present, China has deployed many Soviet-era S-300 defense system.

Reported that although Russia had been negotiating in this regard, but some observers believe that Russia will eventually refused to China for a number of reasons to sell S-400 missile systems. First, there are reports that in the country before the Russian military needs are met, does not intend to foreign sales of S-400, and their needs are met may take several years. More importantly, the Russian military are worried that China would buy one of the few S-400 system, and then steal their technology through reverse engineering into the domestic version. In the past, Russia to sell weapons systems to China has been facing this problem.

It is reported that Russia and China has been seeking through more stringent intellectual property protection signed agreement to resolve this problem. In 2008 the two sides signed an agreement to protect intellectual property, but Russian officials later considered inadequate bound to give up this version. It is said that in 2012 Russia and China signed an agreement more stringent intellectual property protection, but the specific content of the agreement is basically not disclosed.

According to the British “Jane’s Defense Weekly” reported that Russia and China hopes to sign more stringent intellectual property agreements and increase sales volume to prevent reverse engineering. If China first purchased a large number of S-400 system, so even if the Chinese later reverse-engineer the system operation, the loss suffered by the Russian military industry will be smaller.

Reported that, S-400 itself may be greatly improved in China in some unexpected developments of military strength. Range of the missile system is 400 km, experts believe that this way, the Beijing over the Taiwan Strait gained air superiority. United States, “Defense News” weekly in Taiwan last year, citing a former member of the Security Council, once the S-400 ground-based and sea-based PLA fighters combined mainland remain “Taiwan Theater” of the air side will have more confidence, so that Taiwan’s Air Force not organize any resistance, will act as a deterrent to U.S. intervention.

Reported that although Taiwan may be affected by the impact of the PLA deployed S-400′s maximum, but it needs to add strength to face this not only in Taiwan. Japan should respond to China’s S-400, because the system will overwrite the Diaoyu Islands. S-400 system will affect Japan to China’s power projection, but the Japanese

Japanese media: China to buy S400 to deter Taiwan and Japan and India | idrw.org

where the hell india's threat is there ???? :cuckoo::cuckoo:
 
.
BS journalism .It is not against India .It is against Japan and US.
Still PRC depend Russia for high tech systems.
 
.
The Article is pointing the truth , to bully neighbors Chinese needs defenses so that they can do nuclear black mail.

I think this article is also pointing to the potential alliance in the near future :cheers:
 
. .
Suprise~!
Not a Russian media, r u serious ?! :partay:
 
. .
Still PRC depend Russia for high tech systems.

False; China has not purchased or sought a single major weapons system from Russia since the Su-30MKK deals during the very early 2000s. Their growth in their supply chains, R&D investment, and intra-national competition among numerous state-owned or private firms allowed them to even excel Russia in many areas.

The rumor that the PLA is buying the S-400 stems all the way back to 2009 and is unlikely to be real.

Note how the article states that Putin has "allowed" the export of the S-400, but hasn't mentioned that the PLA was indeed wanting to purchase it.

Of course, then there is the "great" history of Russian media reporting: PLAAF buying Tu-160, PLAAF buying Su-35, PLAAF buying T-50, PLAN buying Lada, PLAAF buying Su-33, etc, none of which came true.

Additionally, CASIC and similar companies are building the HQ-8, HQ-19, HQ-26, and HQ-29 missiles, which are equivalents of the Novator K100, THAAD-ER, SM3, and PAC3, respectively. Three of those systems have already been tested. The S-400 would be extremely redundant, even if it is assumed that the S-400 could be delivered before these domestic systems are.

The Article is pointing the truth , to bully neighbors Chinese needs defenses so that they can do nuclear black mail.

I think this article is also pointing to the potential alliance in the near future :cheers:

When did an opinion article that takes an age-old rumor as authoritative information become the truth?
 
Last edited:
.
False; China has not purchased or sought a single major weapons system from Russia since the Su-30MKK deals during the very early 2000s. Their growth in their supply chains, R&D investment, and intra-national competition among numerous state-owned or private firms allowed them to even excel Russia in many areas.

The rumor that the PLA is buying the S-400 stems all the way back to 2009 and is unlikely to be real.

Note how the article states that Putin has "allowed" the export of the S-400, but hasn't mentioned that the PLA was indeed wanting to purchase it.

Of course, then there is the "great" history of Russian media reporting: PLAAF buying Tu-160, PLAAF buying Su-35, PLAAF buying T-50, PLAN buying Lada, PLAAF buying Su-33, etc, none of which came true.

Additionally, CASIC and similar companies are building the HQ-8, HQ-19, HQ-26, and HQ-29 missiles, which are equivalents of the Novator K100, THAAD-ER, SM3, and PAC3, respectively. Three of those systems have already been tested. The S-400 would be extremely redundant, even if it is assumed that the S-400 could be delivered before these domestic systems are.



When did an opinion article that takes an age-old rumor as authoritative information become the truth?

Still SU-30MKK and its chinese version are the backbone of PLAAF.I agree China made good advancement in indigenous technology.But it start from the copying of advanced Russian system.S-400 will be a game changer for China.
When it comes to SAM systems Russia is the kingmaker,even US cant challenge that,that is why they develop F-22 and B-1,but it is not proven whether they can counter S-300 let alone S-400.All of your version ,may better than original S-300, is still apply the same base tech of S -300 systems.
 
.
Still SU-30MKK and its chinese version are the backbone of PLAAF.I agree China made good advancement in indigenous technology.But it start from the copying of advanced Russian system.S-400 will be a game changer for China.
When it comes to SAM systems Russia is the kingmaker,even US cant challenge that,that is why they develop F-22 and B-1,but it is not proven whether they can counter S-300 let alone S-400.All of your version ,may better than original S-300, is still apply the same base tech of S -300 systems.
How do u think Su-30mkk is the main fighter in PLAAF ? China only purchased 90+ Su-30mkk/mk2 fighters, fly as anti-ship role.
Now PLAAF has 200+x J-11A/B and 300x J-10A fighters, they'r PLAAF's backbone. U speak like India Airforce not PLAAF.
 
.
How do u think Su-30mkk is the main fighter in PLAAF ? China only purchased 90+ Su-30mkk/mk2 fighters, fly as anti-ship role.
Now PLAAF has 200+x J-11A/B and 300x J-10A fighters, they'r PLAAF's backbone. U speak like India Airforce not PLAAF.

We dont know about your J-10. Shenyang J-11 is the clear cut copy of Sukhoi-27SK.Do you want proof ?then check Wikipedia.
 
. .
Copying is also a art.....which Indians are not able to-do even with there long military relation with Russia.....
Don't be jealous....

Copying is also an art of cheating which you guys have PHD.Dont claim or steal others effort .So we have a solution called Joint Venture and that is our culture.
 
.
why China still have to buy S400, while they have S300 and could copy to HQ-9, even export their own system ?
I thought, if that's true, means China could copy only, cannot make it better

India transports troops into the common border mainly by air while China use railway ...
So S400 and copies could restrict fast India deployment to the conflict area ... by air.

China would adapt S400 system to their surface ships too as they did to S300
 
Last edited:
.
Copying is also an art of cheating which you guys have PHD.Dont claim or steal others effort .So we have a solution called Joint Venture and that is our culture.

There is no point in inventing wheel again and again... Just copy and make in your county... Every country copy from every one.
 
.
There is no point in inventing wheel again and again... Just copy and make in your county... Every country copy from every one.

But when a time rises this will backfire no doubt.We know that ,otherwise we dont take 25 years and thousands of sorties for giving IOC to LCA .At last we got our own design which no other country cant claim about it .
PRC also know that is why they spend billions of dollars for J-10 and other aircrafts.
If that is case both US and Russia still follow same design .But both have different design and anyone can identify US aircrafts and Russia aircrafts differently.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom