What's new

Japan Seeks India's Supporton Disputes With China

currently Japan has no nukes,if Japan goes nuclear,China will dramatically increase her nuclear ability which has been stockpiled from 1960s. as the biggest industrial nation in the world,let there be no doubt China's capability of mass producing anything.China is a vast country and has been building underground military bunkers and tunnels in the mountains for more than half a century.if there is a nulcear exchange between China and Japan,guess who gets wiped out first.

Western estimate is that China has enough nukes to at least destroy the earth once. destroying a tiny country like Japan doesn't need much. if Japan chose to go nuclear, it amounts to committing suicide.

Your post #6 and post #9 are exact opposite, and by the the land area of Japan wont increase even if they get nukes,i guess you guys already have enought to destroy Japan,even if you increase your nuclear ability,you are not bringing anything thing new to the table for Japan to worry, but if they go nuclear then they are bringing in something new to the table and for you to worry about.
 
.
Some bellicose hyper-nationalists here don't seem to grasp that Japan would develop nuclear weapons only as a defensive deterrent, not to launch a first strike against anyone. As they know doing that would be committing national suicide. Japan, like any other rational actor isn't interested in committing national suicide.

it would basically amount to them saying to any belligerent nuke nation who would be insane enough to launch a first strike "you might obliterate us, but we'll make sure you will lose most of your cities in the process"
.

ummm interesting arguement on bolt part, I think North Korea and South Korea can say the same.
 
. .
India is already a western stooge. We invade India like its nothing so India has no power to be of any use.
 
. .

Do you know who will be ultimate loser if Korea and Japan possessed Nuke? Certainly not China, we have nothing to lose because we're already facing the worst nuke menace which is U.S. But if these nations have Nukes, they will be confident to defend themself then why they need to continue listening and obey U.S? especially Japan, it hasn't forgot the two nukes that U.S had smacked on them during WWII. Kissenger said Japaneses are dreaming Nukes exchange between China-US to realise one stone two birds for revenge and weakening China, this has proven that they're not on honey moon with US

if U.S think to use Japan again China, Japan also want to see China-US getting into conflict to withdraw maximun interests and satistaction. Japan just bow to US because it doesn't has other options, they have all high tech technology to build missile to hit U.S, with Nuke, they will certainly have a hard bargain with U.S, a loosing dog can bite anyone include American...it that ever happen American can kiss and say goodbye to Asia...maybe Phillipinne will let U.S to have a naval base but then the new game will be rewrote in Asia : China vs Japan vs US and not US + Japan vs China as current situation.
 
.
India shuld intervene or support japan.

Then China would know how India felt, when they were supporting pak on kashmir!
 
.
We invade India like its nothing so India has no power to be of any use.

This statement looks good on internet forums per se ! You assert as though India is a tiny country like Laos or Cambodia. :rofl:

Please note that, time has changed so as the current India, come out of 1960's.

I accept that, China has more might than India however, that doesn't mean you take India for granted.

Heck, all big talks of yours, even tiny countries like Japan (according to you) and Vietnam (tiny country for you ?) are standing tall against MIGHTY China ! What have you done till now except whining ?

India is already a western stooge.

If India is a western stooge, what about China, stooge of Russia ? On what basis you are saying that India is a Western stooge ?
 
.
US threatened to nuke China, for whatever reason US didn't nuke China wouldn't change the fact China didn't even blink on the threat of US annihilation with the nuclear bomb. From the past to the present China will fight a war if they think a war worth fighting.

First, it was General MacAuthur threaten to nuke China, not the American, nor the American President.

In fact, MacAuthur was relief of command by simply bringing Nuke and China on the same sentence. This is a commonly known secret

There were only one instance that Nuclear Weapon were on the blink of using in Korea is when the north almost run over Pusan Perimeter, and they didn't. Hence there are no urge to use Nuclear Weapon on anyone.

Nuke have also been in the alternative plan on the "WHAT-IF" situation but that was not the US official Position. Had the Chinese troop gone south of Seoul, the US woulod then consider the "WHAT-IF" situation. But histroy proof that Chinese troop were never even close to south of Seoul, hence the nuclear weapon plan had never really gone ahead.
 
.
First, it was General MacAuthur threaten to nuke China, not the American, nor the American President.

In fact, MacAuthur was relief of command by simply bringing Nuke and China on the same sentence. This is a commonly known secret

There were only one instance that Nuclear Weapon were on the blink of using in Korea is when the north almost run over Pusan Perimeter, and they didn't. Hence there are no urge to use Nuclear Weapon on anyone.

Nuke have also been in the alternative plan on the "WHAT-IF" situation but that was not the US official Position. Had the Chinese troop gone south of Seoul, the US woulod then consider the "WHAT-IF" situation. But histroy proof that Chinese troop were never even close to south of Seoul, hence the nuclear weapon plan had never really gone ahead.



Threaten but didn't carry out. That all it matter, China knew full well US in the past nuked Japan without hesitation, China still enter the Korean war without any possession any nuclear threat.
 
. .
India is a pacifist nation, she on her knee more than on her feet.
 
.
Some bellicose hyper-nationalists here don't seem to grasp that Japan would develop nuclear weapons only as a defensive deterrent, not to launch a first strike against anyone. As they know doing that would be committing national suicide. Japan, like any other rational actor isn't interested in committing national suicide.

a deterrent is only good for those countries with vast lands which enable them to survive the first attack . a tiny country like Japan would never survive the first attack.that's why Japan never thinks about developing nuclear weapons.
 
.
a deterrent is only good for those countries with vast lands which enable them to survive the first attack . a tiny country like Japan would never survive the first attack.that's why Japan never thinks about developing nuclear weapons.

if the japanese are scared of nukes then they should probably go for some ballistic nuclear submarines which can launch slbm.................
that would avoid a nuclear war in the first case and they would be able to maintain a no first strike policy........

my post was in referrence to ur comment that japan wont survive after the first strike.....
 
.
This statement looks good on internet forums per se ! You assert as though India is a tiny country like Laos or Cambodia. :rofl:

Please note that, time has changed so as the current India, come out of 1960's.

I accept that, China has more might than India however, that doesn't mean you take India for granted.

Heck, all big talks of yours, even tiny countries like Japan (according to you) and Vietnam (tiny country for you ?) are standing tall against MIGHTY China ! What have you done till now except whining ?



If India is a western stooge, what about China, stooge of Russia ? On what basis you are saying that India is a Western stooge ?

Of all the countries we have problems with, India is the easiest to slap around as we showed in April of last year. Vietnam and Philippines are way tougher to deal with than weak India.

Laos and Cambodia are tough, don't pretend that India is stronger than these countries.

India is a pacifist nation, she on her knee more than on her feet.

India will always be on their knees.
Just look at how they let our army invade their sovereignty and did nothing about it.
Pretty gutless if you ask me.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom