kolinsky
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
- Messages
- 207
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
The problem is not about meeting or not meeting.I have to agree with others in this thread - there's no point for Chinese leaders to meet with their Japanese counterparts. To do so would only legitimize Abe's glorification of Japan's degenerate history of invasion, theft, rape, cannibalism, and murder. The best thing to do is to leave Japan alone to slowly wither away both economically and demographically.
The problem is what should they talk about.
Xi legitimize Abe nothing, we have nothing for Japan. All things that Japan wants are in the hand of USA. Not Xi and Abe want to talk, the person Abe want to talk with is Obama.
Who is the current leader of east asia, we are ourselves not.
Who is occupying Japan, we are not.
Who limits the military industry of Japan, we do not.
Who does not allow Japan to have more troops, we are not.
Who limits Japanese troops in Japan, we do not.
Who does not allow Japan to have offensive weapon, we do not.
We are just talking about this topics. The only counteraction we have is UN and economy. The guy who behind this is USA.
If USA gives Japan 1000 F15E, we can also blablablabla, we have no counteractions.
If USA wants to free Japan for WW2 70 years ago, we can ever blablablabla.
Even the weapon marketing is limited by USA, there are no competition between Japan and China.
The key problem is, whether USA is glad to share his weapon market with Japan.
That is the reason, the real target of Japan is USA. Conflicting with China is a zigzag way of Abe. Who legitimizes Abe? Obama. Who is releasing power to Japan? USA, not China. That is a classical east Asia trick.
Asking a country to conflict with another is not for free. The leader is alway in the position to share the profits from conflicting with other countries, even there is no profits. Sometimes the Leader gets less than its companies. In the history of China, there are also countries which were destroyed by spending too much on hiring his companies. The debts of USA shows the problem, USA did not get enough profit from the 13 years conflicting from 2001 to 2014. I do not think it can be a long term policy of USA. Obama is helpless. The next president of USA should rethink the diplomacy policies. This time Abe gains the re interpreting of the constitution, in the future USA will has less and less counteraction to Japan. The day will come that USA has to trade with other countries with real gold. Indeed the one who pay for the conflicting between China and Japan is USA. I am very sure these islands will invoke more conflicting in the future, and every time Japan get rid off from USA a little.
The right counteraction of USA is stopping the conflicts now and future by asking Japan to give up all conflicting island with his neighbors just like Potsdam Declaration, otherwise the USA has to pay for it, just like the Germany and Austria in ww1. It was Austria who started the war. And Germany just protected his alliance Austria. When we arguing who is more like Germany in ww1, China or Japan. Indeed that is USA, Japan is in the role of Austria. Notices that conflicting with China, Japan spends even 5 billion US dollar less than 2013. The real question is, who pays and who gains?
Last edited: