antonius123
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,962
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Wiki is hardly any source... there are plenty CCP fanboys who is busy with Internet stuff...
Then what data are you using when claiming that MKI is better than J-11B?
J-11B AESA is not simply from WIKI. There are western analyst who agree on that.
China has shown her capability in radar technology including AESA, from AWACS KJ-500 to Type 052C destroyer has already used AESA.
so you want to say china is far ahead of US and Russia in radar tech????
Nope.
I am asking why you Indian so convinced that MKI can beat J-11B. And now I am starting to see the other way round
SU 30 MKI is better ; No doubt about that
No doubt from your jinggoistic
See RCS data bellow:
SU-27 RCS
= 15 square metter, according to this:
Radar Cross Section (RCS)
vs
SU-30MKI RCS
The Su-30MKI's radar cross-section (RCS) is reportedly about 20 square metres, according to an Indian defence ministry official.[45]
Sukhoi Su-30MKI - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
vs
J-11B RCS
Redesigned air inlets of engine intakes to reduce the radar cross section, this coupled with the adoption of composite material, and application of radar absorbent material has reduced the radar cross section (RCS) of 15 square meters of Su-27SK to just > 3 square meters of J-11B.
China's J-11 Fighter Jet Modernization Program - ASIAN DEFENCE NEWS
RCS of SU30MKI (20 sqm) > SU-27 (15 sqm) > J-11B (3 sqm)
If you compare SU-30MKI RCS is the highest or in the other word the MKI's stealth is the WORST among the three.