I suppose my key take-away is the sentence in red.
There is clearly some difference between my insistence on facts, which you showed was not enough in itself, and your insistence on logic, although perhaps the latter should be facts appropriately selected by application of rigorous logic. It is undeniably right, but I operate in a slightly different part of the coalmines. There is such a lack of the basic information that most time is spent in wearily repeating the same stuff.
My hope is that gradually people will be weaned away from spouting blind prejudices and gossip, instead of well-informed facts, and then perhaps we can get down to the logical rational discussion that you yourself insist on. The ground must be prepared first.