It's too ridiculous to invoke Article 62 & 63." - Imran Khan

[Taimoor Khan]

You are just embarssing yourself in attempt of defending the zina of IK. Mother is saying its child of Imran khan. Imran khan is denying to comment on it . We all know he was playboy in the past with multiple affairs. You are looking four witness to prove that he is the father of illegtimate child without relying on DNA test which could easily verify the statements unless you believe Ik was ra ped by her lol

Chootiya, go and prove IK adultery in the court of law. I have already explained to you the odds that are stacked against you which can easily be contested by IK lawyers. That's why I said earlier that if I were you, I will be looking for the witnesses against IK who have seen the act of adultery.

As for IK getting raped, that itself prove him not guilty, isn't it smart ***? Besides women are known to give men drugs to have non consensual sex for emotional and financial blackmailing.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

You-turn khan know that he could easily disqualified under article 62 especially someone involved in zina which is major sin

Yea tu app farishte bitha dein..insanoo k uppor applicable nhi kyoon k sab phunsey ghey..
Imran khan lol

So i want to know what youthyan say on this ?

did you saw him doing zina???
or your assumption is based on some non Muslim court decision which was given against him, because he didn't followed the case.

 

[Long.Live.Pakistan]

did you saw him doing zina???
or your assumption is based on some non Muslim court decision which was given against him, because he didn't followed the case.

People dont commit zina on street in front of public to record it or witness it. My point was that act of Zina or accusation of sita can be proven/verify with DNA test and it can also be debated whethet it was with mutual consent or she forced imran into it lol Imran is known as playboy in his youth age so its not Impossible thing. If you watch comments/responses of Imran about sita white and his child in youtube then Imran never denied it but instead wanted people to not discuss his private life. He did not challenge the verdict of western court as well. Why? My point was that article 62 and 63 is about private matter and personal character thats why he was oppoing it strictly as according to him no human will ever fulfill the requirements of article 62 and 63 and now its another thing if he is celebrating disqualification of nawaz under same article 62 which he was opposing earlier

 

[Finer]

Article 62 and 63 can prove to be double-edge in the nearest future for Imran Khan since that is what made inroads to the disqualification process of Nawaz Sharif in the first place.

That being said, the adultery is debatable in terms of evidence but the kid being born out of wedlock is totally different matter. It is live evidence which can be proved to clear the doubt if Imran Khan agrees to take DNA test confirming whether he is father or not. If he is proven father who refused to give his name legally, then he is pretty much ruled out according to Article 62 and 63 which just shook Nawaz Sharif down.

Remember, there were no concrete provided by Prosecutors since the whole case was about making the accused party to prove their innocent to back their case. Similarity, this could be argued since it is matter of Pakistan taking Article 62 and 63 into the account.

In term of morally, it is something to ponder since if he cannot give his rights to his daughter legally, how can he to Pakistan as PM since it is duty of PM to look after Pakistan like family.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

People dont commit zina on street in front of public to record it or witness it. My point was that act of Zina or accusation of sita can be proven/verify with DNA test and it can also be debated whethet it was with mutual consent or she forced imran into it lol Imran is known as playboy in his youth age so its not Impossible thing. If you watch comments/responses of Imran about sita white and his child in youtube then Imran never denied it but instead wanted people to not discuss his private life. He did not challenge the verdict of western court as well. Why? My point was that article 62 and 63 is about private matter and personal character thats why he was oppoing it strictly as according to him no human will ever fulfill the requirements of article 62 and 63 and now its another thing if he is celebrating disqualification of nawaz under same article 62 which he was opposing earlier

do you know the punishment in Islam for calling someone zani with no witness???
you have no right to call him zani when you haven't seen him. you don't have the right to assume things about personal life of any person.

 

[TheDarkKnight]

Article 62 and 63 can prove to be double-edge in the nearest future for Imran Khan since that is what made inroads to the disqualification process of Nawaz Sharif in the first place.

That being said, the adultery is debatable in terms of evidence but the kid being born out of wedlock is totally different matter. It is live evidence which can be proved to clear the doubt if Imran Khan agrees to take DNA test confirming whether he is father or not. If he is proven father who refused to give his name legally, then he is pretty much ruled out according to Article 62 and 63 which just shook Nawaz Sharif down.

Remember, there were no concrete provided by Prosecutors since the whole case was about making the accused party to prove their innocent to back their case. Similarity, this could be argued since it is matter of Pakistan taking Article 62 and 63 into the account.

In term of morally, it is something to ponder since if he cannot give his rights to his daughter legally, how can he to Pakistan as PM since it is duty of PM to look after Pakistan like family.

Under what law you will collect dna sample from IK and more importantly from the child who is not even a citizen of Pak? Who will you send to USA to get that kids dna sample?

 

[krash]

Go read article 62 and 63 of constitution first
http://www.article6263.com/save-pakistan/text-from-the-constitution-article-62-63/
I will say only God know who is sadiq and ameen then why judge has to disqualify people under article 62

What planet do you people come from? If you lie to me I declare that you are not sadiq, if you steal from then I declare that you are not ameen. I mean, I can't even....

 

[Zarvan]

Dude IK already confessed that she was his daughter. You are good muslim and you know zina is Gunah-e-Kabira. But looks like party loyalty for you is more important then Islam.

IK has never confessed that he is his daughter he never did.

 

[New World]

@waz @Slav Defence
can you guys stop this zina zina thing..

 

[Zibago]

@waz @Slav Defence
can you guys stop this zina zina thing..

jinhon ney qatariyon ko baji rent par di unka zamir sata raha hy

 

[Path-Finder]

what a load of $hite! these merasi think by mudslinging they will win. Noora pig is answerable for his corruption and imran for his.

 

[koolio]

what a load of $hite! these merasi think by mudslinging they will win. Noora pig is answerable for his corruption and imran for his.

Yes you are right, these brainless baboons are equally responsible for the mess that Pakistan is in today, instead of talking about issues such as clean drinking water, health issues which sadly is non existent. They will only talk about cheap personal attacks which have no basis.

 

[Path-Finder]

Yes you are right, these brainless baboons are equally responsible for the mess that Pakistan is in today, instead of talking about issues such as clean drinking water, health issues which sadly is non existent. They will only talk about cheap personal attacks which have no basis.

Article 62/63 was Sheikh Rasheed. Imran went under some other reference, another lie these kazab are selling. shameless swines. They always revert to using religion to defend themselves shamelessly but what does Islam say about lying at the level of a statesman?

 

[RIP Pak LAW]

Keeping Imran ex private life aside, Imran himself is in danger of being disqualified in few days time. Supreme Court now has placed a very thin threshold to define who is Sadiq o Ameen and whose not and keeping yesterday's verdict in mind, nearly all the polticians, including Imran Khan, are not eligible even if theirs intensions are not shaddy. Common how in the world you can keep track of all the money you earned or gifed by others. Had SC disqualified Nawaz over Panama corruption than that would had made more sense or should had waited for NAB investigation for conclusive and legal action.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Nice try but we are not living in 7th century. Now DNA test is enough.

who is her Mother?