you don't understand what i've said.as nobody uses Sanskrit in everyday's life for speaking,it is considered as "Dead Language".but languages derived from that language may be used,but that doesn't make that "Dead Language's" status change..
read this.......
A language is often declared to be dead even before the last native speaker of the language has died. If there are only a few elderly speakers of a language remaining, and they no longer use that language for communication, then the language is effectively dead. A language that has reached such a reduced stage of use is generally considered
moribund.
Once a language is no longer a native language - that is, if no children are being socialised into it as their primary language - the process of transmission is ended and the language itself will not survive past the current generation. This is rarely a sudden event, but a slow process of each generation learning less and less of the language, until its use is relegated to the domain of traditional use, such as in poetry and song. Typically the transmission of the language from adults to children becomes more and more restricted, to the final setting that adults speaking the language will raise children who never acquire fluency.
Sanskrit fits in this category.whatever similarity Sanskrit has with Malayalam,its not considered as Sanskrit but a different language derived from Sanskrit.there is no reason to get so emotional,as its just a category.a Dead Language servives in Poetry,Literature as well as in various Religious Rituals.but it never become Primary Language for communication.do understand the difference.