Then its very unfortunate for him that Indian courts will not see this is an act of selfless heroic justice.
And what can Indian court do about it? He is not subjected to Indian jurisdiction. Is Indian court in the hostage taking business?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then its very unfortunate for him that Indian courts will not see this is an act of selfless heroic justice.
Shh kid go to school,enough Internet for today.That's because India feels it's invincible in taking the diplomat hostage. There are consequences to its actions. If things escalated to that point, nuking India is one of the consequences.
And what can Indian court do about it? He is not subjected to Indian jurisdiction. Is Indian court in the hostage taking business?
The French diplomat didn't have diplomatic immunity. You fool.
And that episode shows India is a banana republic with **** poor judicial system. That guy was framed by his Indian wife and the whole nation jumped on him. Poor guy.
And what can Indian court do about it? He is not subjected to Indian jurisdiction.
Is Indian court in the hostage taking business?
Shh kid go to school,enough Internet for today.
Have you read the convention?
It's not that the diplomat can do anything and run away.
He can be prosecuted if involved in false assurances,sabotage or any other damage to the host nation.
jack *** he was first arrested and then his diplomatic immunity removed. its upto indian government to decide about his immunity. When receiving diplomats who formally represent the sovereign the receiving head of state grants certain privileges and immunities to ensure they may effectively carry out their duties on the understanding that these are provided on a reciprocal basis but when there wont be diplomatic relation between 2 nations no questions of immunity.
our country our law in the end.
That's because India feels it's invincible in taking the diplomat hostage. There are consequences to its actions. If things escalated to that point, nuking India is one of the consequences.
You are wrong, you simply cannot arrest an ambassador without severe consequences. You cannot arrest diplomats unless the embassy/government waives that immunity. That is the basis of the Geneva convention.
in india government has to oblige if supreme court issues an order. and it may cause the diplomat helped the marines to flee. if this government acts against the supreme court then it will fall and set a dangerous president.
Sir, by submitting an assurance to a court, did he willingly submit himself to the consequences and waived his immunity by becoming party to a legal matter in India? Probably not, but I don't really know much about this.
BTW can't he just say he has his daughter's birthday to attend, or the fair in his hometown and just leave???
it could be dangerous if we did not had valid reason. italian can do tit for tat but indian diplomats are already asked not to go to italy. if india stops diplomatic relations with italy we can argue he is not a diplomat anymore.