Israel will make own decision on Iran, says army chief

[PteX]

No one thought we could crush 3 countries in 6 days either.

 

[IranZamin]

No one thought we could crush 3 countries in 6 days either.

You only defeated Arabs not the Persians. The Persians with help of their proxy hold you off and beat you in 33 days so how you are going to directly take on them when you failed to defeat their proxy ?

Netanyahu is a wise person to sit quiet

 

[azbaroj]

No one thought we could crush 3 countries in 6 days either.

This is 2012 not 1967 , you fight for 33 days with a fraction in 2006 & get the test of new century war .

 

[PteX]

You only defeated Arabs not the Persians. The Persians with help of their proxy hold you off and beat you in 33 days so how you are going to directly take on them when you failed to defeat their proxy ?

Netanyahu is a wise person to sit quiet

Netanyahu is a leader who loves his country and will do everything to defend her unlike your leaders who only love power.

If your proxies try to attack, which is not certain as you'd like it to be, there will be no more discrimination against terrorists using civilians as human shields as was the case in 2006.

We didn't have to fight the Persians because we were friends with them once.
In a full out war, you will be consumed.

 

[IranZamin]

Netanyahu is a leader who loves his country and will do everything to defend her unlike your leaders who only love power.

If your proxies try to attack, which is not certain as you'd like it to be, there will be no more discrimination against terrorists using civilians as human shields as was the case in 2006.

We didn't have to fight the Persians because we were friends with them once.
In a full out war, you will be consumed.

Israel doesnt dare to go against Iran, this is a fact and the whole world knows it.

 

[Zabaniyah]

We didn't have to fight the Persians because we were friends with them once.
In a full out war, you will be consumed.

And just how are you going to do that? Go all the way to Persia and occupy it?

You can't even occupy Lebanon properly even though they virtually had no proper military!

The Arab-Israeli Wars were a different case. But now, it isn't necessarily the same. Post-revolution Iran knew its limitations, and does its best to control the environment such that its security is ensured.

As far as the Iranian regime goes, well that really isn't our decision which government is in place now is it? Let the Iranians decide. They managed to overthrow the almighty Shah before.

We all just have to tolerate a nuclear capable Iran.

After all, we all accept the nuclear armed Israel.

And even IF Israel manages to strike Iran, the consequences for the ME region won't be pretty.

 

[PteX]

And just how are you going to do that? Go all the way to Persia and occupy it?

You can't even occupy Lebanon properly even though they virtually had no proper military!

The Arab-Israeli Wars were a different case. But now, it isn't necessarily the same. Post-revolution Iran knew its limitations, and does its best to control the environment such that its security is ensured.

As far as the Iranian regime goes, well that really isn't our decision which government is in place now is it? Let the Iranians decide. They managed to overthrow the almighty Shah before.

We all just have to tolerate a nuclear capable Iran.

After all, we all accept the nuclear armed Israel.

And even IF Israel manages to strike Iran, the consequences for the ME region won't be pretty.

Consumption means an end. Use your brain Zabaniya, there is no tolerance for a Nuclear Iran.
If a full out war breaks and Iran responds with everything they possess, which includes Biological and Chemical weapons, Israel's doctrine demands Nuclear retaliation.
There are no plans on drawing out this war, let alone occupying them, but a swift one is planned.

 

[Zabaniyah]

Consumption means an end. Use your brain Zabaniya, there is no tolerance for a Nuclear Iran.
If a full out war breaks and Iran responds with everything they possess, which includes Biological and Chemical weapons, Israel's doctrine demands Nuclear retaliation.
There are no plans on drawing out this war, let alone occupying them, but a swift one is planned.

That is given that they will strike you first. It is unlikely that'll they ever have active nuclear weapons, but they do have the fingerprints for it.

Or are you going to nuke them first? That's not going to go well for Israel

Other than that, I do not think there is anything to worry. So far in my neighborhood, Iran didn't cause any major problems whatsoever. They even have good relations with Hindu-majority India. They've never threatened India in anyway. And neither did India threaten them. India, Pakistan and China are good trading partners with Iran, all of the former that are nuclear armed. And yet we have no major issues with them.

Iran's main problem is with the US, which is understandable. Best not to get in the way between them. The US has a lot flaws too. The Americans don't think before doing or saying something and often hold very contradictory positions.

As far as the US is concerned, it is unlikely that they would attack them directly, but rather use a proxy like the GCC states. American public hate seeing their soldiers in body bags.

According to many analysts, they see the potential of Sunni-Shia conflict to dominate in the Middle East in the future. Especially with all the crap that's going on in your next door - Syria.

So therefore, I'd say the GCC states may be your best bet if you want to contain Iran. I doubt if Israel can do it all by itself seeing just how many are involved in the matter, how complex and potentially explosive it already is.

 

[IranZamin]

^^^^ good post but dont place ur bet on the GCC. They are a bunch of incompetent monkeys

 

[Machoman]

how about no one attack no one..............peace in world...

 

[Harry_Thomason]

Consumption means an end. Use your brain Zabaniya, there is no tolerance for a Nuclear Iran.
If a full out war breaks and Iran responds with everything they possess, which includes Biological and Chemical weapons, Israel's doctrine demands Nuclear retaliation.
There are no plans on drawing out this war, let alone occupying them, but a swift one is planned.

There should be no tolerance for any country with nuclear weapons, including Israel. However if Iran due to constant threats by nuclear countries actually makes nuclear weapons, it will be for deterrence only. In that case, if Israel starts nuking Iran, they would have something to respond with, and vice versa, isnt? Mutually assured destruction possibility would force the peace, even if its cold war style, like US vs Soviets.

Also "swift war" vs Iran is impossible, not even by whole NATO forces, what to speak of Israel.

 

[Pakistanisage]

Consumption means an end. Use your brain Zabaniya, there is no tolerance for a Nuclear Iran. If a full out war breaks and Iran responds with everything they possess, which includes Biological and Chemical weapons, Israel's doctrine demands Nuclear retaliation.
There are no plans on drawing out this war, let alone occupying them, but a swift one is planned.

Who the hell decides that there is tolerance for NUCLEAR ISRAEL, but no tolerance for Nuclear Iran ? Does Israel get to make that determination ?

Has the World given that right to ISRAEL ?

 

[cheekybird]

how about no one attack no one..............peace in world...

israel and US doesnt believe in this....what to do..they think the opposite

 

[Zabaniyah]

Has the World given that right to ISRAEL ?

Uncle Ben spoke to Uncle Sam.

Uncle Ben asked Uncle Sam if he can get nuclear weapons given that they'd maintain opacity such that it doesn't threaten US interests in the world.

Uncle Sam said okay.

Uncle Ben is happy.

Everyone is happy since Uncle Sam is happy.

ALL HAIL THE STOOGES!

 

[PteX]

That is given that they will strike you first. It is unlikely that'll they ever have active nuclear weapons, but they do have the fingerprints for it.

Or are you going to nuke them first? That's not going to go well for Israel

Other than that, I do not think there is anything to worry. So far in my neighborhood, Iran didn't cause any major problems whatsoever. They even have good relations with Hindu-majority India. They've never threatened India in anyway. And neither did India threaten them. India, Pakistan and China are good trading partners with Iran, all of the former that are nuclear armed. And yet we have no major issues with them.

Iran's main problem is with the US, which is understandable. Best not to get in the way between them. The US has a lot flaws too. The Americans don't think before doing or saying something and often hold very contradictory positions.

As far as the US is concerned, it is unlikely that they would attack them directly, but rather use a proxy like the GCC states. American public hate seeing their soldiers in body bags.

According to many analysts, they see the potential of Sunni-Shia conflict to dominate in the Middle East in the future. Especially with all the crap that's going on in your next door - Syria.

So therefore, I'd say the GCC states may be your best bet if you want to contain Iran. I doubt if Israel can do it all by itself seeing just how many are involved in the matter, how complex and potentially explosive it already is.

Have no conflicts? They directly fund and admit to funding anyone and everyone who is against Israel.
Not to mention all the terror attacks they committed directly against Israeli targets.

Your analysis falls short of reality considering the fact that Iran is run by religious fanatics who believe and desire for the world to end so that the Messiah comes.

Their conflict, like all Muslim Fanatics, is against the western civilization. Israel is their main obstacle from spreading their fanatical interpretation of Islam and Sharia Law all over the middle east and the world.

Without the presence of US in the middle east, Iran would have long taken over the Arab states.