The laws overtly treated Jews as having less rights than others, which facilitated their murder.
Nazi-era laws certainly treated Jews as having less civil rights than others. By contrast, Arabs in Israel maintain the civil rights they had under the Mandate.
Because they're the ones who were invaded and occupied.
Batting zero. The Jews bought land from Arabs, had it ceded to them by sovereign right, or settled upon land that was abandoned by Arabs who fled to the enemy camp. The Arabs were not expelled as a group and Israel remains 20%+ Arab. On the other hand, Jews and many other non-Muslim minorities have been expelled from countries where Muslims wield political power.
But you've shed light upon something very interesting: the Zionist belief in 'punishing' Palestinians. That's what all the operations, JDAMs, bulldozers and checkpoints are really about. It's blatantly obvious, no matter how many times they say it's about 'self defense'.
As pointed out many times, the truths in Pakistan about Israel are suppressed to serve political purposes. It's really messing up your minds and is the best reason for Pakistan to openly establish friendly relations with the Jewish State.
So the legality of the Zionist Occupation is based on the Laws set by the British Occupation.
Now you're just rewinding back to the beginning. Two thumbs down.
Arabs being in revolt doesn't do you any good, considering that Zionists had also opposed the British mandate and murdered a few hundred of their officers while openly proclaiming a Jewish revolt against the Mandate.
The Brits corrupted the Mandate by working against its purpose. Thus the Jews had both a moral and a legal basis to such opposition. Note that the Irgun, a group that was fanatically anti-British, was the only Zionist armed organization to accept Arabs into its fold.
As for Ben Gurion's morality, his 'grasp' is irrelevant. His actions are what matter, and they were far from moral.
Since you don't accept the context, your pronouncement is baseless.
Zionists have been murdering Palestinians since long before the current Palestinian Arab leadership even existed.
Turning the record back AGAIN. Really, it must be shameful for Pakistanis to read this and realize they are unable to dispute you without fear of retaliation, either political, professional, or social.
Regardless, you are wrong about Palestinian demands; they are in favour of pre-1967 borders and have repeatedly said that they would recognize Israel if these conditions are met.
What they say one moment isn't what they say the next; the goalposts keep moving. For years now the insistence is on a Palestine without Jews.
It's the Zionists who are unwilling to compromise. It's the Zionists who invaded. No one with a conscience is going to stand with them and their brutal occupation.
Zero, zero, and zero; while proclaiming you're not out to exterminate the Jews you nonetheless grant everyone on the planet license to do so.
Of course another way to "end the occupation" is to do what the Arabs did with the Jews in the countries that came under their political control: expel them. Ethnic cleansing. If you are revolted at the thought of "the Palestinians" being expelled from Israel, what, then, do you have to say against the robbery and expulsion of Jews from "Arab" lands?