ISRAEL IS HIDING THAT ITS STATE-OF-ART F-35 WARPLANE WAS HIT BY SYRIAN S-200 MISSILE – REPORTS

[khail007]

Ahahahaha literally never happened but you wish it did, also southfront is just a crappy Russian propaganda site, S-400 cannot hit an F-16 or a Tomahawk why would an S-200 hit an Israeli F-35?
Which are, by the way, not operational yet since our crews still learn to operate it?

Also those aren't even Israeli F-35s in the picture and it is a mere photoshop which was made before they arrived to Israel.

Sir, as India signed for S400 and they claimed that in case, if there is war, no PAF plane will be able to take-off.
Your claim is otherwise; so could you please explain in detail about actual capabilities of both systems; s200 and S400.
Many countries are in negotiations with Russia to strike a deal for S400 considering it very capable and potent system.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Anything reflects. If you can see it, chances are radar can too. S-200 homes in on the source of reflection. It could certainly shoot down F-35. F-117 was shot down over Serbia which led to its early retirement.

I doubt s-200 can make a direct hit but it can make a lot of shrapnel and in proximity of the target they can make nasty damages.

 

[Beny Karachun]

Anything reflects. If you can see it, chances are radar can too. S-200 homes in on the source of reflection. It could certainly shoot down F-35. F-117 was shot down over Serbia which led to its early retirement.

hahaha, what an embarrassment for American Israeli super duper stealth junk!


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-18/did-syria-just-strike-israeli-f-35-jet

Israeli sources were not able to show a photo of the F-35 warplane after the “bird collision”. Furthermore, it is not clear if the F-35 can become operational again "in the next few days" - as the Israeli Army's statement claims - because its stealth coating was likely damaged.

Thus, according to the Israeli version, the warplane reportedly became no longer operational after the bird collision, despite the fact that the F-35 earlier passed the bird strike certification with outstanding results (official info here). The F-35 is the world’s most expensive warplane with its price of development now at about $406.5 billion.

>Zero hedge
Never happened, you only wish for it.

Bird strike certification is only against the cockpit, what if it hit the air intake?
Do you imply that a 217kg warhead hit the F-35, which later on just kept flying to Israel, landed, and by the next week will get repaired and fly again?

 

[mohsen]

>Zero hedge
Never happened, you only wish for it.

You better stick to the argument,
when it comes to credibility, Israeli sources are the last ones.

Bird strike certification is only against the cockpit, what if it hit the air intake?
Do you imply that a 217kg warhead hit the F-35, which later on just kept flying to Israel, landed, and by the next week will get repaired and fly again?

not all missile impacts are accurate or critical.
the fact remains that Israel didn't dare to publish the footage, not even a censored one. it just shows the location of damage is against their claims.

 

[Beny Karachun]

You better stick to the argument,
when it comes to credibility, Israeli sources are the last ones.

According to its worst enemies Iran.

Footage of what? A bird hitting the F-35? Why didn't you show footage of hitting the F-35? Surely you wouldn't miss such a thing.

 

[mohsen]

According to its worst enemies Iran.

Footage of what? A bird hitting the F-35?

No, footage of that so called minor damage.

Why didn't you show footage of hitting the F-35? Surely you wouldn't miss such a thing.

too bad there is no camera on S-200 missiles!
Syrian claimed to target your fighter over Lebanon and next day your F-35 became inoperational due to some damage.
It's clear who needs to prove his words.

 

[Beny Karachun]

No, footage of that so called minor damage.

There is not too much close up footage of Israeli aircraft at all, let alone the new F-35.

too bad there is no camera on S-200 missiles!
Syrian claimed to target your fighter over Lebanon and next day your F-35 became inoperational due to some damage.
It's clear who needs to prove his words.

Not on the S-200, on the ground battery. Because of Earth's curvature, you need to have a visual sight to even detect it with a radar, it cannot be behind a mountain or behind the Earth's curvature relative to the radar, like this:

You claim to shoot down many Israeli aircraft yet you never have any proof of it.

No, footage of that so called minor damage.



too bad there is no camera on S-200 missiles!
Syrian claimed to target your fighter over Lebanon and next day your F-35 became inoperational due to some damage.
It's clear who needs to prove his words.

Look at this

 

[Hack-Hook]

>Zero hedge
Never happened, you only wish for it.

Bird strike certification is only against the cockpit, what if it hit the air intake?
Do you imply that a 217kg warhead hit the F-35, which later on just kept flying to Israel, landed, and by the next week will get repaired and fly again?

Well I say a bird strike to a single engine aircraft specially in engine area is something I hope I never experience . incidentally this scenario is far more hazardous for the airplane.

Look at this and then shut up

Incidentally this guy in another video claim that f117 incident over Serbia was the only time that stealth defeated but in reality stealth another time get defeated in rq170 incident over Iran . I wonder if that is not considered misinformation after that worse than a bad news channel is a bad news channel that publish lies or something like that.


And professor SA-8 have a range of 15km now S-200 range is something like 250km . don't you think there must be something different about these two? After all mathematically there is a small difference of like 17 time with those ranges .

 

[Beny Karachun]

Incidentally this guy in another video claim that f117 incident over Serbia was the only time that stealth defeated but in reality stealth another time get defeated in rq170 incident over Iran . I wonder if that is not considered misinformation after that worse than a bad news channel is a bad news channel that publish lies or something like that.

RQ170 Wasn't brought down via a missile, the Americans claim it crashed.
You claim you hacked it, the F-35 is controlled by the pilot and not by a remote control anyways so hacking is out of the question. Also the F-35's firewall is pretty much impossible to crack

 

[Hack-Hook]

RQ170 Wasn't brought down via a missile, the Americans claim it crashed.
You claim you hacked it, the F-35 is controlled by the pilot and not by a remote control anyways so hacking is out of the question. Also the F-35's firewall is pretty much impossible to crack

an advise from me to you never believe in impossible always there is a way.
Also rq170 stealth was defeated its not important that they hacked it or shut it down . they use stealth to make invisible and in both case of rq170 and f117 that invisibility compromised so the opponent could defeat the platform.
The key point in countering stealth its detecting them . if you detect it its not important if you use 1940 air defence cannon to bring it down or 2017 AAM.or give some boys some fancy toy to hack it or spoof it or any thing else.

 

[Beny Karachun]

an advise from me to you never believe in impossible always there is a way.
Also rq170 stealth was defeated its not important that they hacked it or shut it down . they use stealth to make invisible and in both case of rq170 and f117 that invisibility compromised so the opponent could defeat the platform.
The key point in countering stealth its detecting them . if you detect it its not important if you use 1940 air defence cannon to bring it down or 2017 AAM.or give some boys some fancy toy to hack it or spoof it or any thing else.

Except the US claimed it wasn't hacked, they claim it crashed.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Except the US claimed it wasn't hacked, they claim it crashed.

It come down in middle of desert did USA explained how Iran found it an crashed stealth drone in middle of empty desert before they do and how we find it intact ?
Also did they explained how we monitored the drone and had video of it over Iran airspace

 

[mohsen]

There is not too much close up footage of Israeli aircraft at all, let alone the new F-35.

Yeah, we know who is the coward.

Not on the S-200, on the ground battery. Because of Earth's curvature, you need to have a visual sight to even detect it with a radar, it cannot be behind a mountain or behind the Earth's curvature relative to the radar, like this:

You claim to shoot down many Israeli aircraft yet you never have any proof of it.
Cowards.

looks like you have no idea what has happened.
the ground battery was kilometers away inside Syria, missile has hit the Israeli jet over Lebanon.

Look at this and then shut up

what a load of B.S, don't trust southfront cause we say so, oh, yeah, we just needed your confirmation!

It reminds me of the time Hezbollah missile hit the Israeli warship and your failed military had no excuse but to say our electronic systems were offline, right in the middle of the war and within the enemy territory!

and if it wasn't the live footage of incident in AlManar TV, your failed navy would claim:
our ship hit a whale!

 

[Beny Karachun]

Yeah, we know who is the coward.

The one that doesn't do jack shit when his allies get bombed.

looks like you have no idea what has happened.
the ground battery was kilometers away inside Syria, missile has hit the Israeli jet over Lebanon.

You believe the S-200's radar saw an F-35 from more than several kilometers?
You're delusional.

what a load of B.S, don't trust southfront cause we say so, oh, yeah, we just needed your confirmation!

It reminds me of the time Hezbollah missile hit the Israeli warship and your failed military had no excuse but to say our electronic systems were offline, right in the middle of the war and within the enemy territory!

and if it wasn't the live footage of incident in AlManar TV, your failed navy would claim:
our ship hit a whale!

Oh, so you bring in unrelated incidents to prove your point? Syria also claimed it shot down an American F-22 over Syria, Syria claimed it conquered Tel Aviv in 1967, Russia claimed it disabled an entire destroyer with electronic warfare which is a hoax, Russian shill sites always push for the agenda that the F-35 is "useless" while constantly lying and being caught.

Anyways, the Syrian ministry of defense claimed they directly hit an F-35, yet it somehow returned to Israel, landed, and got repaired by now?
Besides, the Israeli F-35 isn't even combat ready yet, and there would be some time until it would fly and bomb Syria.

As the guy said in his video, "This is just a coverup by the Israeli Mossad"

 

[ashok321]

Did a Russian Missile Really Hit an Israeli F-35?

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/did-russian-missile-really-hit-israeli-f-35-22926