TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
@Joe Shearer ran out of argument and now resorts to circular logic. Every post of him just contradict the other.
In above statement he tried to imply that the political boundary limits the linguistic boundary.
In the next statement he thinks that political boundary has anything to do with linguist boundary. Completely failed logic
Read your history and geography textbooks from school again.
Neither Pragjyotishpur nor Kamarupa have anything to do with Bengal. Nor does the language the inhabitants of those places in the Brahmaputra Valley spoke have anything to do with the languages that the inhabitants of the five different places that are today called Bengal and Bangladesh spoke.
In above statement he tried to imply that the political boundary limits the linguistic boundary.
In the next statement he thinks that political boundary has anything to do with linguist boundary. Completely failed logic
That was an administrative point of view that you have quoted, and has nothing to do with expert or learned opinion.
That was also a decision in 1872, when the British were trying to consolidate their hold on the newly conquered country, Assam, and did not want to consider any of the fine print.
The trouble with you Bangladeshi commentators is that you are stuck in a time warp. One of you lives in the 13th century, the other one lives in the 19th century.