What's new

Islam at war – with itself

Status
Not open for further replies.

karan.1970

BANNED
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Messages
14,781
Reaction score
-20
Country
India
Location
India
Islam at war ? with itself - DAWN.COM

From Aleppo in Syria to Quetta in Balochistan, Muslims are engaged in the slaughter of other Muslims. The numbers are enormous: over 93,000 killed in the Syrian civil war and over 48,000 dead in Pakistan. Millions have perished in similar intra-Muslim conflicts in the past four decades. Many wonder if the belief in Islam was sufficient to bind Muslims in peace with each other.
Since the end of the Second World War, the world has moved in two distinct directions. The West, mostly Christian, has tried to minimise the intra-European conflict and has largely been successful with some exceptions. The Muslim world, on the other hand, has fallen into one violent conflict after another, involving mostly Muslims. Several intra-Muslim conflicts continue to simmer as proxy wars. In the 80s, the Iran-Iraq war alone left millions dead. More recently, a car bomb in Iraq on Sunday killed another 39 in the sectarian warfare between the Shias and Sunnis that killed at least 1,045 in May 2013.

As the violence amongst Muslims increases, most Muslims prefer denial or look for scapegoats. Those in denial believe no such violence exists and the entire issue is made up by the western-controlled media. Others blame it on scapegoats – Indians and Americans are the most frequently blamed. The overwhelming evidence, however, suggests that the sectarian and tribal divisions amongst Muslims and justifying violence in the name of religion are the primary causes of why Islam is at war with itself.

In Pakistan, confessions and appalling claims of responsibility by the spokespersons for the Tehreek-i-Taliban and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi should leave no doubt about where the guilt resides. At the same time, the Pakistani Intelligence agencies have put together incriminating evidence running into hundreds of thousands of pages against the extremist sectarian outfits, al Qaeda affiliates, the nationalist militias in Balochistan, and others who have perpetrated indiscriminate violence against civilians and the State resulting in over 48,000 deaths since 2004.

The hate-fuelled gulfs that divide Muslims are so wide that not only unarmed civilians, but doctors and others who try to save victims of violence, are also targeted by the extremists. The attack on the Bolan Medical Complex on Saturday, which left scores dead including four nurses, was not the first of its kind. A sectarian attack in Karachi in February 2010 was followed by a bomb attack on the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Hospital where victims were rushed for treatment. More than 25 Shia Muslims perished in the two attacks.

And while the Muslim on Muslim violence is claiming victims all over Pakistan, the violence against non-Muslims, including Hindus and Christians, often brings together Muslims of different stripes, who would otherwise be fighting each other, in attacking religious minorities.

The targeted killings of university professors in Karachi and Quetta, the murder of Shia doctors and professionals, and the attacks on the shrines of patron saints are all evidence of the fact that Muslims have been killing other Muslims while being motivated by hate and using Islam to justify violence.

Why is that the belief in Islam is not sufficient to prevent violence amongst Muslims? From the very first day Muslims are taught that their belief in Islam trumps all other identities that they may hold. Their skin colour, tribe, caste or creed, none matters once they enter the fold of Islam. Why then, have millions of Muslims died at the hands of their fellow believers?

Political, religious, and other leaders in the Muslim world have kept the dialogue focused on the conflicts where Muslims have been the victims. The Bosnian conflict, the communal violence in India, which has caused the death of thousands of Muslims, and the Arab-Israeli conflict have been the focus of Muslim leaders. Seldom has the dialogue focused on why Muslims kill other Muslims. And even if the topic ever comes up, it ends up being an exercise in mass scapegoating.

Muslim societies have thus evolved into places where revenge is confused with justice, forgiveness with weakness, and peace with cowardice. These are the places where unholy men wage holy wars against unarmed civilians, pitching Muslims against other Muslims.

Imagine the state of mind of the person who wore a suicide vest and boarded the bus carrying young women whose bright faces were lit with the pride of being educated. There was no reason to attack these innocent women who were unarmed and unrelated to any conflict. But that did not deter the suicide bomber who proceeded to kill them and herself in a suicide attack.

Moments before the blast, the young women were ignorant of the pain that would soon be inflicted on them. They must be smiling and talking to their friends, planning for the rest of the day and for what lay ahead in their lives. The suicide bomber looked at the faces of the women who, if given the opportunity, would most certainly have improved the plight of their impoverished nation.

And then the blast. Some died instantaneously. Others must have suffered the agonising pain of the wounds and the resulting fire that engulfed the bus and consumed its riders. Those who survived the blast must have heard the cries for help emerging from deep inside the bus. The rescuers must have rushed to the bus, but could not assist the victims since the leaping flames kept everyone at bay.

Somewhere in or near Quetta a group of men chanted with pride, Allah-u-Akbar (God is great), eulogising the female suicide bomber for killing the very women who held the most promise for Pakistan. Their spokesperson called the news outlets to claim responsibility for the attack on unarmed women. Later, at the Bolan Medical Complex in Quetta, another group of men, armed with AK-47 and wearing suicide vests, engaged the security personnel in a standoff that left several more dead, including four nurses who were attending to the wounded from the earlier blast.

This was all done in the name of Islam. This will be repeated sooner than later. Some would argue this is not the “real” Islam. Does it really matter what real Islam is when its true followers cannot stand against those who use religion to commit genocide?
 
.
Does it really matter what real Islam is when its true followers cannot stand against those who use religion to commit genocide?[/COLOR][/B]


To increasing numbers of persons, whether they are Muslims or otherwise, it does not matter what "real" or "true" Islam is - though it appears that only after great loss will a majority of Muslims grow a voice, in the meantime, minority of "real and true Muslims will ensure that the world of Islam will contract and not expand
 
.
To increasing numbers of persons, whether they are Muslims or otherwise, it does not matter what "real" or "true" Islam is - though it appears that only after great loss will a majority of Muslims grow a voice, in the meantime, minority of "real and true Muslims will ensure that the world of Islam will contract and not expand

Mutation of the tenets of a religion over time is always expected and in some cases, is also desired. But what's unfortunate in case of Islam is that today's perception of it has actually become an exact opposite of what it started off as..
 
.
When you already give a verdict for people be they support violence or not why don't you accept the verdict on yourself as well? Either you find Muslims violent which is condemnable or you find them defending Islam and condemning such acts in that case again you blame them that they are living in a state of denial. Its always easier to pass judgements on Muslims and if Muslims are the biggest casualities then it proves that it isn't Islam at fault but people dragging a religion to prove a point. Most people don't care about Muslims losing their lives because either they live in Pakistan in some cases or believe they all deserve to die which again shows a sick mentality. If somebody claims to be secular and not feel sympathy for people losing their lives everyday just because they are Muslims rather choose to pass judgements on the victims then they are without any human feelings.
 
.
Mutation of the tenants of a religion over time is always expected and in some cases, is also desired. But what's unfortunate in case of Islam is that today's perception of it has actually become an exact opposite of what it started off as..

This the fat Islam of rituals and no meaning, people, I am persuaded, will find greater appeal in the lean Islam of Faith and Meaning. That may mean a whole lot less persons identifying themselves as Muslims but I think, at least to my understanding, that is not a bad thing.
 
.
Ad hominem attacks...and bullying..
Not a war with itself...just propaganda..
 
. .
Islam will be at war with itself till the sunni and shia power centers, ie, Saudi and Iran have excess petro money to spend .

Muslim societies have thus evolved into places where revenge is confused with justice, forgiveness with weakness, and peace with cowardice. These are the places where unholy men wage holy wars against unarmed civilians, pitching Muslims against other Muslims.
Quoted for truth.
 
.
Ok....i shouldn't have commented without reading the article :D
its about shia sunni mainly..or thats the only part i can take seriously......True that

Our mosque was many times taken over by shia..and many times fired upon...
But under lying reasons for the attacks weren't because they were shia and we were sunni..reasons were 90% other 10% religion...
 
.
And they forget that there are almost as many followers of Islam in India as in Pakistan. So again Religious Thekedari (1), Insaniyat(0)

Wait a minute - those are 4th class Muslims, not real/true Muslims -- I mean they would have to be, right? No you say? Well then how do you explain the way they are treated?
Some day, one day
 
.
An interesting read.

Somehow I think this violence will keep escalating among Muslims till it becomes unbearable and backbreaking...and then Muslims will reform.

Just like how Christianity forced itself down the throats of people so much that Christians evolved and separated church from state.
 
.
There is inherent violence in Islam. The world of Islam is divided into Dar al-Islam (House of Islam) and Dar al-Harb (House of war). Dar al-Islam is states where Muslims (faithful) are dominant and Dar al-Harb are states where non-Muslims (kafirs) are dominant. It is a duty of all Muslims to make the whole world Dar al-Islam, primarily through Jihad (Islamic holy war). When Muslim states are relatively stronger than others, the violent urges in the Islamic societies are channeled into jihad with the weaker kafir states. Jihad serves multiple purposes Viz. spread of the faith, accumulation of wealth by the islamic state from plunder of defeated kafir state and most importantly as pressure relief valve for the violent urges in Dar al-Islam. In todays world, the Dar al-Harb is relatively more powerful and united than Dar al-Islam. So, open jihad with guaranteed victory is not possible. This is building up the violence pressure in Dar al-Islam, with no easy outlet for the violent energy developing. US's WOT in Afghanistan and Iraq gave some sort of relief to this pressure. After Obama administrations decision to wind down WOT, the ****** pressure is causing internal hemorrhage in Dar al-Islam, which is manifested in various forms like Arab spring, civil wars in Syria, Pakistan etc. Also, the changing demographics in the muslim world with rapid rise of populations and limited opportunities and resources has mulitplying effect on the Muslim discontent, which sooner or later will get converted to violence.
 
.
To increasing numbers of persons, whether they are Muslims or otherwise, it does not matter what "real" or "true" Islam is - though it appears that only after great loss will a majority of Muslims grow a voice, in the meantime, minority of "real and true Muslims will ensure that the world of Islam will contract and not expand

@muse; that may well be a part of "an evolutionary process" that organised religions have to go through. Just recall that Christianity in Europe had to go through similar sectarian blood-letting to reach wherever they have reached now. Other religious systems have undergone that even earlier. Only then does some "balance" gets arrived at.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
It is vital for Pakistanis to understand this problem. They continue to live in a world that is unhindered by the ground realities of difference of opinions, cultures, linguistics and faiths. They don't realize that the beast of violence has become too big for even their own leaders. So much so that more Muslims are getting killing in the name of religion.

Blaming the Jews, Indians, Americans and the proverbial 'West' is easy; introspection is difficult. But it is this difficult and dangerous task that one must take and have the courage to acknowledge the problems that currently plague Muslim societies all across major centres of population around the world.

Pakistan is particularly so because of the situation it has invited by aligning with the interests of a country that is thousands of miles away from all the confusion and chaos. While Alignment in itself is not the problem, NOT taking the responsibility for the damage done as a result of that alliance is.

It is high time Muslims and Pakistanis specifically realize what damage they are doing to the region and to themselves.

There is no 'Muslim world'. There is only the world where people of different backgrounds exist.

This jehad will get Pakistan nowhere.
 
.
Is there ever going to be reformation movement in Islam like the one European Christianity went through in 14th-15th century and the countless reformation movements in Hinduism over centuries? I think reformation is is not feasible in Islam, since separation of mosque-military-state is not acceptable as per basic foundations of Islam.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom