gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
And who has the power to consider the Shias 'heretics'? Certain community/political leaders. Of the past, of course. But how enduring is that decision today?What it shows is that the supposed apathy towards science and modernity are not mandated by Islam, but are artificial constructs of certain community/political leaders.
Pakistan market bomb kills scores | World news | The Observer
Very enduring, it appears.A bomb attack on a crowded grocery market in a Shia-dominated neighbourhood in Pakistan has left at least 65 people dead and more than 180 wounded.
You object to the implication that there is a causal relationship between Islam and the decay of science in the Islamic world.
Objection noted.
But is there anything in Islam that declared the Shia sect to be 'heretics'? If not, then you have to agree that the declaration of Shias to be 'heretics' is one such artificial constructs, no? And such an artificial construct has proven to be quite enduring, murderously so, spanning over one thousand years.
So...How enduring will it be of the idea that the Quran is a never ending fountain of scientific knowledge? In this case, no specific community/political leadership is propagating this nonsense but the Muslims themselves.
As long as this meme continue to exist and propagate, your objection will be considered irrelevant by the non-Muslims. For the non-Muslims, we will not care if there is a concrete causal relationship between Islam and the decay of science in the Islamic countries. For us, if there is something as fallacious as the Quran is THE source of all scientific knowledge and there are enough Muslims who believe in it, our subjective interpretation that there is such a causal link will be enough.