Menace2Society
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 2, 2011
- Messages
- 10,410
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
Ever been there ? Didn't think so....
Obvious reasons why I wouldn't go there, same with you going to Iraq. Both are crapholes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ever been there ? Didn't think so....
You take it for free or not but your country dumped billions to make sure it stays f*cked up.
Obvious reasons why I wouldn't go there, same with you going to Iraq. Both are crapholes.
Perhaps you don't care because you people are sitting thousands of miles away. The only thing concerns you is the oil. It matters to us what happens around us. A stable M.E is in our interests.How big of a mistake was that ? Let them kill each other. Who cares ? If it weren't for oil, the world wouldn't take the time to spit at the M.E.
Like Pakistan ?
Like Pakistan ?
Perhaps you don't care because you people are sitting thousands of miles away. The only thing concerns you is the oil. It matters to us what happens around us. A stable M.E is in our interests.
No, like your mums pussy. Smells worse than detroit.
Its your country supporting same mullahs in Syria while opposing them in Iraq. Its f*cked up in 2014 because of the mullahs engineered/funded by your country. In Afghanistan NATO is fighting same mullahs funded by US in 1980s in the name of jihad/islam.What, all the oil we 'stole' from Iraq ? That part of the would has/ will be f*cked up because they have shit like tribes and mullahs, sects, warlords.... It's fucking 2014 !!!!
Hahahahha
They can invade everybody: Russia, Syria, Libya, Africa, China and never Israel
They rush everywhere with JEW NATO jets & TOW missiles, wahabis full of USA bases supporting them
Zionist Al Qaeda
Its your country supporting same mullahs in Syria while opposing them in Iraq. Its f*cked up in 2014 because of the mullahs engineered/funded by your country. In Afghanistan NATO is fighting same mullahs funded by US in 1980s in the name of jihad/islam.
Its your country supporting same mullahs in Syria while opposing them in Iraq. Its f*cked up in 2014 because of the mullahs engineered/funded by your country. In Afghanistan NATO is fighting same mullahs funded by US in 1980s in the name of jihad/islam.
Hahahahha
They can invade everybody: Russia, Syria, Libya, Africa, China and never Israel
They rush everywhere with JEW NATO jets & TOW missiles, wahabis full of USA bases supporting them
Zionist Al Qaeda
lol,
That reminded me of some Pakistani's here saying "this is not the right time" when hizbut tehrir calls of Pakistan to attack Israel.
Such extremist movements are far more dangerous for the Muslim world than israel.The Islamic State, or ISIS, has responded to critics who have questioned why its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is not actively supporting Hamas in fighting Israel.
After capturing vast swathes of Iraq and Syria, ISIS declared the regions under its control as a "Caliphate", or Islamic state, and appointed Baghdadi as "leader of the Muslims". While many jihadists celebrated the announcement, others - including Al Qaeda, which ISIS broke off from last year - have criticized the move for a variety of reasons.
Since the recent escalation between Israel and Islamist terrorists in Gaza, some of those critics have questioned why a self-declared "Caliphate" is not rushing to the aid of Muslims in the Hamas-controlled territory.
In a statement a spokesperson for the group, Nidal Nuseiri reaffirmed that conquering "Bayt el-Maqdis" (Jerusalem) and destroying the State of Israel is central to the group's "jihad", or holy war.
However, he pointed out that ISIS has been taking a systematic approach in its campaign, and outlined six specific stages it said needed to be fulfilled before taking on Israel.
Some of those "stages" - building a firm base for an Islamic state in Iraq, and using it as a springboard to wage war in Syria and Lebanon - have already been achieved. But he said a number of other criteria still needed to be fulfilled before challenging Israel directly.
Among them, Nuseiri said that the US - seen as Israel's greatest ally - needed to be weakened politically and economically via attacks on the American mainland, as well as US interests in Muslim countries. Additionally, the existing "Islamic State" needed to expand its borders to cover all of "Greater Syria" (which would include Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and possibly Gaza); such a state, he said, would then be in a position for a direct confrontation with Israel.
ISIS Explains Why 'Islamic State' Not Helping Gaza - Middle East - News - Arutz Sheva