What's new

ISI behind 26/11, from start to end: Home Secy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah...Enough with this Mumbai Attack bullshit.Indian's still trying to capitalize on that incident.Well what can India do except barking against ISI.
surely india will get nothing by barking on ISI, but they will definitely doing something on ground. be careful.
 
.
Cold Star?Was that supposed to be a joke or are you serious?Why posting here?If you have the balls then declare War on Pakistan immediately and apply your cold war strategy?Remember your soldiers just pissed on the borders for well over 2 years on 2002 standoff and went home and even got 500+ killed just in preparation..Your ammo dumps were blown by your own people by mistake..or maybe it was sabotage.who knows.
 
Last edited:
.
What advantages would this give to the ISI?

The ISI doesn't do anything that doesn't get them anything. In India's case, they get 'sympathy' from the rest of the world just by pointing their finger at the ISI.

Fail logic is fail.
 
.
What advantages would this give to the ISI?

The ISI doesn't do anything that doesn't get them anything. In India's case, they get 'sympathy' from the rest of the world just by pointing their finger at the ISI.

Fail logic is fail.

it was the insult of india,that they couldnt protect the own ppl and ppl frm abroad.specially israeli ppl.

u r saying that india got sympathy of world.whole world points finger towards pak not india only,it means whole world wants sympathy
 
.
it was the insult of india,that they couldnt protect the own ppl and ppl frm abroad.specially israeli ppl.

u r saying that india got sympathy of world.whole world points finger towards pak not india only,it means whole world wants sympathy
:blink::blink:
Whole world or only india????? And to remind you it was a diplomatic embarrassment for india.
 
.
:blink::blink:
Whole world or only india????? And to remind you it was a diplomatic embarrassment for india.

ya few countries says

1)pak ,a migraine for the world
2)few countries give blunt warning that next terror attack on them will be painful 4 pak
3)some says do more.

wat do u expect frm me.india didnt say this.
it was the embarrassment 4 india coz isi was successful.which is stated in heading
 
.
ya few countries says

1)pak ,a migraine for the world
2)few countries give blunt warning that next terror attack on them will be painful 4 pak
3)some says do more.

wat do u expect frm me.india didnt say this.
it was the embarrassment 4 india coz isi was successful.which is stated in heading

Give sources for your claims.
 
.
Data Darbar bombing is past. Chill out and look for the future!!

I would not suggest, agree or appreciate any such loss of human lives in this fashion.

@topic: Home secratory is not a news reporter or blogger. While I agree India does not seem to have concrete proof of ISI involvement, he certainly must have some information about some rogue elements. I understand his (or rather anybody's) comments does not hold much weightage in court. There might be some purpose behind it, at this point of time.
 
.
I would not suggest, agree or appreciate any such loss of human lives in this fashion.

@topic: Home secratory is not a news reporter or blogger. While I agree India does not seem to have concrete proof of ISI involvement, he certainly must have some information about some rogue elements. I understand his (or rather anybody's) comments does not hold much weightage in court. There might be some purpose behind it, at this point of time.

At this time coz in near future he is cuming to Pakistan and dont want to sit on talking table to solve our issues whenever we tried to talk and solve issues u ppl cum up with sumthing new without any proof .
Home sectary have proof give us , and if u think ur Home Sectary is talking right then Our Minister also pointed out the Indian involment in Baluchistan and Swat so tht mean u agree with it .
 
. .
:rofl: cut it out you guys!!! indians are like 70 year old women always cribbing!! Headley said what??

firstly indians got to agree to either one of the following points:

1) ISI is to smart & cunning to carry out MUMBAI attacks without anyone finding out (if so then your theory of ISI left traces of its links gets busted how can an intelligence agency be so powerful and yet so dumb)!

2) ISI is dumb and got caught by leaving traces such as headley & kasab!! if so then they can't plan such a big attack and be succesful!! :bunny:

:lol:
 
.
And for all u guys Tell me one thing from whole of this thing do we (as Pakistani ,ISI) got anything ,like any benefit .

Answer is BIG NO.
Then y are u people just pulling us in it . CIA , Mossad they are powerful agencies they can make event look like it was done by Pakistan.and tht it .
Who loss we Pakistani and indians coz we will keep fighting and we can never exsist in peace with each other .
Benefit they can sell many weapons to them and by destablising Pakistan US of A is getting its work done.as far as ISI is concerned they are trying to save Pakistan intrest and thts it.
 
.
.
:rofl: cut it out you guys!!! indians are like 70 year old women always cribbing!! Headley said what??

firstly indians got to agree to either one of the following points:

1) ISI is to smart & cunning to carry out MUMBAI attacks without anyone finding out (if so then your theory of ISI left traces of its links gets busted how can an intelligence agency be so powerful and yet so dumb)!

2) ISI is dumb and got caught by leaving traces such as headley & kasab!! if so then they can't plan such a big attack and be succesful!! :bunny:

:lol:
cia trained the isi in every manner.it is showing it's color:wave::wave::wave:
 
.
What more 'proof' you need? Video recordings of the ISI planning attacks? :rolleyes:

Headley was interrogated in front of his lawyers and US officials. So when the Home Secretary reveals this if not true, can be questioned by his lawyers.

Then there should be an official statement from a US court/judge whatever - otherwise we only have the Indian HM's word for it and absolutely no evidence to back it up, not to mention that even if Headley 'confessed' his statements need to then be investigated and verified.

The Indian HM could claim that Headley 'confessed' he was abducted by Martians after all - that does not make it true.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom