XenoEnsi-14
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2014
- Messages
- 2,987
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Would be dealt with the same way it's being dealt with on Earth, and probably wouldn't be that much of a problem for about 1,000 years. Structures would most likely domed or pyramid shaped.what about effects like volcanism and quakes??
It's estimated to have five times the mass of Earth and mostly be ice.1. has anyone actually seen or measured the oort cloud??
For common folk yes, A. and B. for short term then D.with fusion for long term, fission of plutonium is more dangerous than fusion of deuterium so that won't be likely.i believe the near-future and future main source of electricity would be via generators based on "sterling engines", whose only two requirements are working gas and a heat source...
the heat source on mars can be... (a). biofuel ( renewable ), (b). petrochemicals ( from titan ), (c). nuclear material ( plutonium, whenever available ), (d). simple solar concentrator.
We should be more gentle to each other, but in reality majority of people are materialistic. Minimal high-tech can only go so far, you need high tech for travel in between planets and large projects such as terraforming and growing planets.we should be a more gentle humanity, using technology only when absolutely required... that is sophistication. i am much inspired by the minimal high-tech in the dune books by frank herbert.
Induced Gamma Emission, spaceship propulsion would likely be ion drives powered by a nuclear fission/fusion reactor.i don't know what "ige" means... microwave??
Aggravating the rest of the world is a perfectly good reason not to.there is no real reason not to.