What's new

Is Modi, India’s Zia?

Laozi

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
4,293
Reaction score
-27
Country
India
Location
India
Is Modi, India’s Zia? | The Express Tribune


1984995-modi-1559451906-794-640x480.png

Indian premier Narendra Modi. PHOTO: REUTERS

Modi’s win is a spectacular loss for India. No one understands this better than my generation of Pakistanis known as Zia’s children. What Zia orchestrated in the 80s to use religion for realisation of political goals Modi is engineering in India today. With one important nuance. The Pakistani people never elected Zia into office. Meanwhile, the Indian people have elected a man who flirts with the spilling of minority blood — especially Muslims — into the office for a second time!

A second Modi term will permanently disfigure the secular, social fabric of the largest democracy in the world. It makes me uncomfortable to write the words mass murderer or blood-thirsty leader, to describe the leader of the world’s largest democracy but consider the following excerpts from Timemagazine’s recent cover story, naming Modi, India’s Divider in Chief:

“India’s Muslims, who make up some 14% of the population, have been subjected to episode after violent episode, in which Hindu mobs, often with what seems to be the state’s tacit support, have carried out a series of public lynching in the name of the holy cow, that ready symbol of Hindu piety. The most enduring image of Modi’s tenure is the sight of Mohammad Naeem in a blood-soaked undershirt in 2017, eyes white and enlarged, begging the mob for his life before he is beaten to death. The response of leadership in every instance is the same: virtual silence.”

Does this story sound familiar to the blasphemy mobs in Pakistan? The irony of these words being penned in Time magazine by an Indian man, Aatish Taseer, who happens to be the son of the slain Pakistani governor, Salman Taseer, shouldn’t be lost on anyone. One could argue that Salman was assassinated by one of Zia’s children, Mumtaz Qadri, who grew up on an explosively-politicised mix of religion and violence. Today, Salman Taseer’s son is warning India of its children becoming Modi’s children.

Having a prime minister who exploits religion to pursue political goals doesn’t come without cost to society. Consider the infighting, intolerance and extremism bred in Pakistan as a result of Zia’s policies. Modi’s rule will haunt Indians for generations to come.

It took 72 years but the Quaid-e-Azam’s Two-Nation theory has been decisively endorsed by the long arc of history. Forget my arguments, Narendra Modi is the only person ever to be denied a US visa based on a little-known law on religious freedom, even though he applied for a diplomatic visa as a sitting chief minister. This led to nearly a decade-long US travel ban imposed over his role in Gujarat’s anti-Muslim riots, which left thousands dead (the UK and several European nations had also slapped a defacto travel ban on Modi).

In addition to being a problem child himself, what’s worse is that Modi is also the symptom of a far more dangerous problem; an Indian electorate at peace with war-mongering. The performance of the Indian economy wasn’t exactly the reason behind Modi’s win, it was his hardline rhetoric and warmonger-like adventurism with Pakistan that allowed him to sweep the elections. This is in striking contrast to Pakistan, where every mainstream political party runs on a platform of peace with India and if any political leader was to call for war with India to get re-elected, they would be laughed out of office.

The last lesson one can take away from Modi’s win is that he only needs to be better than the opposition to defeat it. Perhaps, this explains Imran Khan’s current political calculus in which he can simultaneously pull off painful economic reforms with accountability for opposition leaders.

There’s an old joke about two guys walking in a jungle, who come across a lion. One of the men calmly puts down his backpack and then takes off running. The other man yells, “You’ll never outrun that lion!” to which the other man responds, “I don’t need to outrun the lion; I just need to outrun you!” Modi’s win demonstrates that Imran Khan might just be able to win a second term too. It’s okay that he doesn’t have a magic wand to instantly fix the economy; he only needs to outrun the PML-N and the PPP.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 2nd, 2019.

my two cents :

All Pakistanis are not happy with Modi leading India for second term as was portrayed on this forum. The writer is visibly worried and confused, because of Modi's re-election.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1984995/6-modi-indias-zia/


 
. .
Modi can be compared to Zia if we have,
1 - Number of communal instances of violence in his tenure
2 - Laws that were promulgated which somehow minorities vulnerable
3 - Press Freedom index rating (Increasing or decreasing)
4 - Rise of conservatism sanctioned by state (in any way)

People can be compared based on things we choose for comparison. There cannot be two same personalities in every sphere.
 
. . . .
Is Modi, India’s Zia? | The Express Tribune


1984995-modi-1559451906-794-640x480.png

Indian premier Narendra Modi. PHOTO: REUTERS

Modi’s win is a spectacular loss for India. No one understands this better than my generation of Pakistanis known as Zia’s children. What Zia orchestrated in the 80s to use religion for realisation of political goals Modi is engineering in India today. With one important nuance. The Pakistani people never elected Zia into office. Meanwhile, the Indian people have elected a man who flirts with the spilling of minority blood — especially Muslims — into the office for a second time!

A second Modi term will permanently disfigure the secular, social fabric of the largest democracy in the world. It makes me uncomfortable to write the words mass murderer or blood-thirsty leader, to describe the leader of the world’s largest democracy but consider the following excerpts from Timemagazine’s recent cover story, naming Modi, India’s Divider in Chief:

“India’s Muslims, who make up some 14% of the population, have been subjected to episode after violent episode, in which Hindu mobs, often with what seems to be the state’s tacit support, have carried out a series of public lynching in the name of the holy cow, that ready symbol of Hindu piety. The most enduring image of Modi’s tenure is the sight of Mohammad Naeem in a blood-soaked undershirt in 2017, eyes white and enlarged, begging the mob for his life before he is beaten to death. The response of leadership in every instance is the same: virtual silence.”

Does this story sound familiar to the blasphemy mobs in Pakistan? The irony of these words being penned in Time magazine by an Indian man, Aatish Taseer, who happens to be the son of the slain Pakistani governor, Salman Taseer, shouldn’t be lost on anyone. One could argue that Salman was assassinated by one of Zia’s children, Mumtaz Qadri, who grew up on an explosively-politicised mix of religion and violence. Today, Salman Taseer’s son is warning India of its children becoming Modi’s children.

Having a prime minister who exploits religion to pursue political goals doesn’t come without cost to society. Consider the infighting, intolerance and extremism bred in Pakistan as a result of Zia’s policies. Modi’s rule will haunt Indians for generations to come.

It took 72 years but the Quaid-e-Azam’s Two-Nation theory has been decisively endorsed by the long arc of history. Forget my arguments, Narendra Modi is the only person ever to be denied a US visa based on a little-known law on religious freedom, even though he applied for a diplomatic visa as a sitting chief minister. This led to nearly a decade-long US travel ban imposed over his role in Gujarat’s anti-Muslim riots, which left thousands dead (the UK and several European nations had also slapped a defacto travel ban on Modi).

In addition to being a problem child himself, what’s worse is that Modi is also the symptom of a far more dangerous problem; an Indian electorate at peace with war-mongering. The performance of the Indian economy wasn’t exactly the reason behind Modi’s win, it was his hardline rhetoric and warmonger-like adventurism with Pakistan that allowed him to sweep the elections. This is in striking contrast to Pakistan, where every mainstream political party runs on a platform of peace with India and if any political leader was to call for war with India to get re-elected, they would be laughed out of office.

The last lesson one can take away from Modi’s win is that he only needs to be better than the opposition to defeat it. Perhaps, this explains Imran Khan’s current political calculus in which he can simultaneously pull off painful economic reforms with accountability for opposition leaders.

There’s an old joke about two guys walking in a jungle, who come across a lion. One of the men calmly puts down his backpack and then takes off running. The other man yells, “You’ll never outrun that lion!” to which the other man responds, “I don’t need to outrun the lion; I just need to outrun you!” Modi’s win demonstrates that Imran Khan might just be able to win a second term too. It’s okay that he doesn’t have a magic wand to instantly fix the economy; he only needs to outrun the PML-N and the PPP.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 2nd, 2019.

my two cents :

All Pakistanis are not happy with Modi leading India for second term as was portrayed on this forum. The writer is visibly worried and confused, because of Modi's re-election.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1984995/6-modi-indias-zia/

Typical bharti! Cherry picking single article to prove your point. Most Pakistanis don't care about modi winning and a few are happy.

Hitler was similarly elected by the people in exactly the same way. Modi is using the Hitler model to rise to power and he will pay the same price.
Hitler was smarter compared to modi.
 
. .
modi is not zia neither hitler modi is just a guy who is delusional a sick person who will destroy india!


jay Modi ki!
 
. .
h
Is Modi, India’s Zia? | The Express Tribune


1984995-modi-1559451906-794-640x480.png

Indian premier Narendra Modi. PHOTO: REUTERS

Modi’s win is a spectacular loss for India. No one understands this better than my generation of Pakistanis known as Zia’s children. What Zia orchestrated in the 80s to use religion for realisation of political goals Modi is engineering in India today. With one important nuance. The Pakistani people never elected Zia into office. Meanwhile, the Indian people have elected a man who flirts with the spilling of minority blood — especially Muslims — into the office for a second time!

A second Modi term will permanently disfigure the secular, social fabric of the largest democracy in the world. It makes me uncomfortable to write the words mass murderer or blood-thirsty leader, to describe the leader of the world’s largest democracy but consider the following excerpts from Timemagazine’s recent cover story, naming Modi, India’s Divider in Chief:

“India’s Muslims, who make up some 14% of the population, have been subjected to episode after violent episode, in which Hindu mobs, often with what seems to be the state’s tacit support, have carried out a series of public lynching in the name of the holy cow, that ready symbol of Hindu piety. The most enduring image of Modi’s tenure is the sight of Mohammad Naeem in a blood-soaked undershirt in 2017, eyes white and enlarged, begging the mob for his life before he is beaten to death. The response of leadership in every instance is the same: virtual silence.”

Does this story sound familiar to the blasphemy mobs in Pakistan? The irony of these words being penned in Time magazine by an Indian man, Aatish Taseer, who happens to be the son of the slain Pakistani governor, Salman Taseer, shouldn’t be lost on anyone. One could argue that Salman was assassinated by one of Zia’s children, Mumtaz Qadri, who grew up on an explosively-politicised mix of religion and violence. Today, Salman Taseer’s son is warning India of its children becoming Modi’s children.

Having a prime minister who exploits religion to pursue political goals doesn’t come without cost to society. Consider the infighting, intolerance and extremism bred in Pakistan as a result of Zia’s policies. Modi’s rule will haunt Indians for generations to come.

It took 72 years but the Quaid-e-Azam’s Two-Nation theory has been decisively endorsed by the long arc of history. Forget my arguments, Narendra Modi is the only person ever to be denied a US visa based on a little-known law on religious freedom, even though he applied for a diplomatic visa as a sitting chief minister. This led to nearly a decade-long US travel ban imposed over his role in Gujarat’s anti-Muslim riots, which left thousands dead (the UK and several European nations had also slapped a defacto travel ban on Modi).

In addition to being a problem child himself, what’s worse is that Modi is also the symptom of a far more dangerous problem; an Indian electorate at peace with war-mongering. The performance of the Indian economy wasn’t exactly the reason behind Modi’s win, it was his hardline rhetoric and warmonger-like adventurism with Pakistan that allowed him to sweep the elections. This is in striking contrast to Pakistan, where every mainstream political party runs on a platform of peace with India and if any political leader was to call for war with India to get re-elected, they would be laughed out of office.

The last lesson one can take away from Modi’s win is that he only needs to be better than the opposition to defeat it. Perhaps, this explains Imran Khan’s current political calculus in which he can simultaneously pull off painful economic reforms with accountability for opposition leaders.

There’s an old joke about two guys walking in a jungle, who come across a lion. One of the men calmly puts down his backpack and then takes off running. The other man yells, “You’ll never outrun that lion!” to which the other man responds, “I don’t need to outrun the lion; I just need to outrun you!” Modi’s win demonstrates that Imran Khan might just be able to win a second term too. It’s okay that he doesn’t have a magic wand to instantly fix the economy; he only needs to outrun the PML-N and the PPP.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 2nd, 2019.

my two cents :

All Pakistanis are not happy with Modi leading India for second term as was portrayed on this forum. The writer is visibly worried and confused, because of Modi's re-election.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1984995/6-modi-indias-zia/

How you can compare a terrorist with Army general ??A man who killed nearly 1000 muslims in Gujrat is the Prime Minister of India today .Secondly , Army generals are not elected by the people .Where as Modi was elected by the people of India which shows their mentality .
 
.
nope its worse then zia . zia was at least a bit open mind then modi .
 
.
nope its worse then zia . zia was at least a bit open mind then modi .
You guys are brainwashed about Modi.
He is a very good man for his own country.
Ya.. he can be very dangerous for Pakistan. So i can understand you worries.
This is just a butthurt typical Pakistani article.
Modi is not a much religious guy, he pretty much secular. He is just a hard core nationalist. Even many Indian Muslims praise and support him. He is doing great job for the rights of Muslims ladies , "India first' was his slogan in election campaign.
I can understand the pain of Pakistanis.
So no surprise.
 
.
h

How you can compare a terrorist with Army general ??A man who killed nearly 1000 muslims in Gujrat is the Prime Minister of India today .Secondly , Army generals are not elected by the people .Where as Modi was elected by the people of India which shows their mentality .
How you brand a person as "Terrorist"

Nehru and Jinnah got hundreds of thousand people killed for their self interest. Do you call them "Terrorist"

nope its worse then zia . zia was at least a bit open mind then modi .
Yeah, I heard stories about Zia's liking for Bollywood. He definitely was more open minded.
 
.
You guys are brainwashed about Modi.
He is a very good man for his own country.
Ya.. he can be very dangerous for Pakistan. So i can understand you worries.
This is just a butthurt typical Pakistani article.
Modi is not a much religious guy, he pretty much secular. He is just a hard core nationalist. Even many Indian Muslims praise and support him. He is doing great job for the rights of Muslims ladies , "India first' was his slogan in election campaign.
I can understand the pain of Pakistanis.
So no surprise.
we are not indians to be brain washed

he is so so much dangerous we have seen the might on 27feb . in fact he give us a pleasure of victory after some 23 years .:lol:

yes he is good for india i wish he rule you guys some 50 years . but zia was not this much stupid person keep in mind .

pakistanis pain is we need more abbhinandans to clean our hands thanks to modi ji.

whatever article is i can see india is dividing society and its deepen day by day which is very good for Pakistan . never though in my life a guy will kill 49 indian solders in one run but its happen thanks to modi's policies .
modi is that great person that you run from this forum on 26 feb and then return after a month on 27 march in tail between legs :rofl:
Screenshot_2019-06-02 Search Results.png

How you brand a person as "Terrorist"

Nehru and Jinnah got hundreds of thousand people killed for their self interest. Do you call them "Terrorist"


Yeah, I heard stories about Zia's liking for Bollywood. He definitely was more open minded.
zia was not blind nationalist and drama queen like modi . and other thing zia was not a liar like modi as zia was not participate in elections to fool us . in fact zia fooled USA on nukes and we got successfully nukes .and zia was not narcissist person
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom