What's new

Is Modi, India’s Zia?

Typical bharti! Cherry picking single article to prove your point. Most Pakistanis don't care about modi winning and a few are happy.


Hitler was smarter compared to modi.

Oh we can see that in each and every forum.
Everyone thinks it was the military action against Pakistan helped .
You are wrong .
Even though it helped him a little .
It was the revolutionary reforms that helped to regain the power.

You dont know how much happy the Indian women feels about their PM.
It was the womens vote that helped to come back.
An average Indian women day starts with never ending breating exercise for cooking .
Well LPG gas distribution is now complete,same for electricity ,sanitation ,health care (Modicare) .
All these efforts helped the end user and that turns in to vote .
National security was just a finishing touch only for upperclass voters.

You know PM gave five suggestions to his fellow ministers.
If possible all of their offices should work at full 24 hrs .
Avoid vacation ,avoid media,unnecessary talks and unnecessary luxuries.

So there is a huge gap between a dictaker and an elected PM and govt.
 
.
You guys are brainwashed about Modi.
He is a very good man for his own country.
Ya.. he can be very dangerous for Pakistan. So i can understand you worries.
This is just a butthurt typical Pakistani article.
Modi is not a much religious guy, he pretty much secular. He is just a hard core nationalist. Even many Indian Muslims praise and support him. He is doing great job for the rights of Muslims ladies , "India first' was his slogan in election campaign.
I can understand the pain of Pakistanis.
So no surprise.
The problem with islamists is that they view everything from point of their religion or themselves. According to them only better place on earth is muslim lands with sharia law. Rest of the countries are all defective and anti-muslim.


The amount of attention seeking, me myself ...etc has reach epic proportions. Its just my way or highway.
 
.
Is Modi, India’s Zia? | The Express Tribune


1984995-modi-1559451906-794-640x480.png

Indian premier Narendra Modi. PHOTO: REUTERS

Modi’s win is a spectacular loss for India. No one understands this better than my generation of Pakistanis known as Zia’s children. What Zia orchestrated in the 80s to use religion for realisation of political goals Modi is engineering in India today. With one important nuance. The Pakistani people never elected Zia into office. Meanwhile, the Indian people have elected a man who flirts with the spilling of minority blood — especially Muslims — into the office for a second time!

A second Modi term will permanently disfigure the secular, social fabric of the largest democracy in the world. It makes me uncomfortable to write the words mass murderer or blood-thirsty leader, to describe the leader of the world’s largest democracy but consider the following excerpts from Timemagazine’s recent cover story, naming Modi, India’s Divider in Chief:

“India’s Muslims, who make up some 14% of the population, have been subjected to episode after violent episode, in which Hindu mobs, often with what seems to be the state’s tacit support, have carried out a series of public lynching in the name of the holy cow, that ready symbol of Hindu piety. The most enduring image of Modi’s tenure is the sight of Mohammad Naeem in a blood-soaked undershirt in 2017, eyes white and enlarged, begging the mob for his life before he is beaten to death. The response of leadership in every instance is the same: virtual silence.”

Does this story sound familiar to the blasphemy mobs in Pakistan? The irony of these words being penned in Time magazine by an Indian man, Aatish Taseer, who happens to be the son of the slain Pakistani governor, Salman Taseer, shouldn’t be lost on anyone. One could argue that Salman was assassinated by one of Zia’s children, Mumtaz Qadri, who grew up on an explosively-politicised mix of religion and violence. Today, Salman Taseer’s son is warning India of its children becoming Modi’s children.

Having a prime minister who exploits religion to pursue political goals doesn’t come without cost to society. Consider the infighting, intolerance and extremism bred in Pakistan as a result of Zia’s policies. Modi’s rule will haunt Indians for generations to come.

It took 72 years but the Quaid-e-Azam’s Two-Nation theory has been decisively endorsed by the long arc of history. Forget my arguments, Narendra Modi is the only person ever to be denied a US visa based on a little-known law on religious freedom, even though he applied for a diplomatic visa as a sitting chief minister. This led to nearly a decade-long US travel ban imposed over his role in Gujarat’s anti-Muslim riots, which left thousands dead (the UK and several European nations had also slapped a defacto travel ban on Modi).

In addition to being a problem child himself, what’s worse is that Modi is also the symptom of a far more dangerous problem; an Indian electorate at peace with war-mongering. The performance of the Indian economy wasn’t exactly the reason behind Modi’s win, it was his hardline rhetoric and warmonger-like adventurism with Pakistan that allowed him to sweep the elections. This is in striking contrast to Pakistan, where every mainstream political party runs on a platform of peace with India and if any political leader was to call for war with India to get re-elected, they would be laughed out of office.

The last lesson one can take away from Modi’s win is that he only needs to be better than the opposition to defeat it. Perhaps, this explains Imran Khan’s current political calculus in which he can simultaneously pull off painful economic reforms with accountability for opposition leaders.

There’s an old joke about two guys walking in a jungle, who come across a lion. One of the men calmly puts down his backpack and then takes off running. The other man yells, “You’ll never outrun that lion!” to which the other man responds, “I don’t need to outrun the lion; I just need to outrun you!” Modi’s win demonstrates that Imran Khan might just be able to win a second term too. It’s okay that he doesn’t have a magic wand to instantly fix the economy; he only needs to outrun the PML-N and the PPP.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 2nd, 2019.

my two cents :

All Pakistanis are not happy with Modi leading India for second term as was portrayed on this forum. The writer is visibly worried and confused, because of Modi's re-election.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1984995/6-modi-indias-zia/

Don't compare great sir zia to a vermin
 
.
Typical bharti! Cherry picking single article to prove your point. Most Pakistanis don't care about modi winning and a few are happy.


Hitler was smarter compared to modi.

Oh we can see that in each and every forum.
Everyone thinks it was the military action against Pakistan helped .
You are wrong .
Even though it helped him a little .
It was the revolutionary reforms that helped to regain the power.

You dont know how much happy the Indian women feels about their PM.
It was the womens vote that helped to come back.
An average Indian women day starts with never ending breating exercise for cooking .
Well LPG gas distribution is now complete,same for electricity ,sanitation ,health care (Modicare) .
All these efforts helped the end user and that turns in to vote .
National security was just a finishing touch only for upperclass voters.

You know PM gave five suggestions to his fellow ministers.
If possible all of their offices should work at full 24 hrs .
Avoid vacation ,avoid media,unnecessary talks and unnecessary luxuries.

So there is a huge gap between a dictaker and an elected PM and govt.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom