It must be coincidence the last few wars USA has been involved in all involved muslims countries Somalia,Iraq(twice),Afghanistan,Lebanon/Hezbollah via Israel and in the future Iran. Also the war on terror is focused only on muslims that must also be coincidence
and the western media only likes to show chaos in muslim countries, when there are
terrorists,civil wars,military takeovers all over the world. It is war against muslims. Why would they make claims of weapons of mass destruction prove there are none and still
continue with a false war? Why is Iran constantly threatened? No muslims countries
should defend themselves that's what the west wants.
It must be coincidence the last few wars USA has been involved in all involved muslims countries Somalia,Iraq(twice),Afghanistan,Lebanon/Hezbollah via Israel and in the future Iran. Also the war on terror is focused only on muslims that must also be coincidence
and the western media only likes to show chaos in muslim countries, when there are
terrorists,civil wars,military takeovers all over the world. It is war against muslims. Why would they make claims of weapons of mass destruction prove there are none and still
continue with a false war? Why is Iran constantly threatened? No muslims countries
should defend themselves that's what the west wants.
It is not a War against Islam.
It is a war that is aimed at promoting American national interests.
There are many reasons, but let's look at some beyond the myopic Islam prism that seems to have clouded your thoughts.
After the demise of USSR and the Cold War, the US was left as the only superpower in the world.
The US has seized the opportunity to ensure that it builds a position in the world that is unassailable for a considerable period of time. One should read the Defence Policy Guidelines and the National Energy Policy to comprehend the essence of US policy.
A bit of education would dispel the myopic view that the US has embarked on a War on Islam.
Osama provided the opportunity and the US seized it.
Oil engines the world economy, industries and the military. Oil reserves are depleting. He who control the Oil, controls the world. It is the most important of strategic inputs.
And where is the maximum oil found? Middle East. Which are the nations in the Middle East that have oil? Moslem countries including Iran. Are they friendly with the US? None except Saudi Arabia. That is why the US does not target the Saudis, inspite of Osama and the Wahhabis who are in the forefront of exporting terrorism and because the Saudi King kowtows to the Americans!
Now, why was Iraq the target, even though Saddam was hardly a true Moslem, who suppressed both the Sunnis and the Shias.
Check the map. It is in the centre of the Middle East. Occupation of the centre would allow action on all sides of the Middle East. It is as simple as that and what is more, it has the largest reserve of sweet oil and second largest of oilfields in the world. By occupying the second largest oil fields in the world, the OPEC cartel could also be broken and oil prices controlled as per the US requirement.
Why Iran? To prevent either the Sunnis or Shia have any ascendancy in the Middle East and to keep the rivalry going so that they do not form one single Islamic bloc by burying their historical animosity. That Iraq is Shia majority and so is Iran is not a very comfortable situation for either the US or the Sunni Arabs and more so, since they control a sizeable amount of oil and gas of the world.
Why Afghanistan and Pakistan (though Pakistan is not in the US ambit in this context)? If one reads the National Intelligence Estimates, one would realise that the European industry is facing stagnation and the new oil guzzlers would be India and China. Therefore, whoever controls the supply of oil to these two can also strangulate them or else tweak them to agree to US terms. And both are growing fast and that does not auger well for anyone who wishes to control the world.
Therefore, it is essential to ensure that there is oil supply to these two countries but controlled by the US. In this context, the TAP is the answer. But the TAP can only flow through Afghanistan and Pakistan. That is why both are of interest to the US. In this context, the US opposition to the IPI can be understood.
It is time that quite a few of you do some serious reading , preferably not in the vernacular since they, well most, will only parrot the views that you are now exhibiting. Time you rid yourself of your myopic view of the world with you Islam and Pakistan centric glasses so that you can view the world event more pragmatically and fathom the ground realities. It is also time to rid yourself of your paranoia and thus be seized with the irrational persecution complex!
It will do you and the world a world of good!