Pakistan's prestige does not depend on having ICBMs but its survival does. Of course, those who are doing the bidding for uncle sam will try their best to stop Pakistan from having ICBMs.
Thank you for showing your concern for Pakistan but keep in mind that we (Pakistani) are most concerned about our security needs.
However, we (Pakistani) also have more pressing matters to deal with at the moment. Even Bangladesh is doing better economically then Pakistan.
We (Pakistani) need to strengthen our country internally first before we plan for very expensive military endeavors. ICBM project is
very expensive for countries like ours.
Pakistan currently faces economic threat from its enemies, if you have not noticed yet. Pakistan is specially loosing the
water war against India with passage of time. Corrupt Pakistani politicians are equally responsible.
Developing ICBM will not solve our problems. If it is to keep potential enemies from far flung regions at bay; you are sadly mistaken. With poor economy, we won't be able to afford these missiles in large numbers and cost of maintenance and R&D will be enormous.
Quote from FAS:
These foreign outlets have also exposed the proliferant world to the high expense associated with building an ICBM. In the late 1980s, Iraq could afford to trade some of its oil wealth for the cost of buying the entire corporate talent of one research and development (R&D) firm. Most economies that can sustain such a high level of funding are either already building space launch vehicles (France and China), are in a multilateral arrangement to build one (Germany, Great Britain, Italy), or have recently abandoned building one because of market forces (South Africa). ICBM attacks must also be effective because a launching nation will get few opportunities to continue the attack. The simple cost of an ICBM limits the total size of a missile inventory. This decreases the potential for sustained firing of ICBMs, a tactic used to disrupt a society by the threat of repeated chemical weapons attacks by long-range missiles.
Also, ICBM project would have its drawbacks too.
1. ICBM launch sites can be easily targeted. Even mobile ICBM platforms are difficult to hide. And few numbers would be useless, unless nuclear warheads are used which would be unlikely. Nuclear weapons are restricted to deterrence roles now.
2. Political rammifications will be enormous. ICBM project will draw unwanted attention from the entire world. With our internationl image already down the drain, we can be economically isolated by the international community to give up this program. US may even threaten to take preliminary action against us to force us to end this project. Even if the project is kept secret from the public during development phase, this still does not guarantees cover from foreign intelligence agencies. Sooner or later, we would need to test prototypes and this will blow the cover, if it is not lifted before.
So you do the math now. All of this is not as easy as it sounds or we would have developed a prototype by now.