What's new

Is India the only country that denies it's creation by European colonialists?

Lol. And which film "stars" are these?

Lets see,
Starting from Dilip Kumar, to Rajkapoor, Rajesh Khanna, Madhu Bala, Gulzar, ...
they were born in what is now pakistan,
or had parents from what is now pakistan.

https://www.desimartini.com/news/ma...tya-singh-with-a-frying-pan-article131047.htm

Now, you must think what is this very strong trend like so ?
Read following sentences:

India got independence from British rule.
Pakistan created out of India.
India liberated Bangladesh from Pakistan.

There was no such thing as India .. it was a collection of independent princely states; brirish were the first to unite them in one country whose center of gravity was mostly east / south east.
 
.
Lets see,
Starting from Dilip Kumar, to Rajkapoor, Rajesh Khanna, Madhu Bala, Gulzar, ...
they were born in what is now pakistan,
or had parents from what is now pakistan.

https://www.desimartini.com/news/ma...tya-singh-with-a-frying-pan-article131047.htm

Now, you must think what is this very strong trend like so ?


There was no such thing as India .. it was a collection of independent princely states; brirish were the first to unite them in one country whose center of gravity was mostly east / south east.
Lol. So people who were big in the 1960s, 1950s and even in the 1940s. 4-5 names?
And that makes it a majority? Most Indian movie stars are from India and have Indic roots. Some old timers might have some ancestral connection with Pakistan but that puts them in a minority, not the majority.
 
.
Is there any other post-colonial country that suffers from this level of delusion? In Africa or Asia?
Even if you take out the civilization state concept out of India and take just the current federal republic even then Britain didn't mark each and every territory in our land, kashmir, Junagadh, Hyderabad, goa, sikkim, Tripura, etc you name it, we built our own country on our idea of what constitutes India and Indian people and worked towards getting them inside Indian union. Yes Europeans played a pretty big part in what is modern India but not on it's entirity. So why should we give all credit to Europeans?
 
. .
Lol. So people who were big in the 1960s, 1950s and even in the 1940s. 4-5 names?
And that makes it a majority? Most Indian movie stars are from India and have Indic roots. Some old timers might have some ancestral connection with Pakistan but that puts them in a minority, not the majority.

I can see your resistance to accept; and that is not unique
What i shared was a smaller list, you should have done more research on your own; I stopped following indian cinema since 1980s.
Juhi chawla, Raveena Tandon etc have roots in pakistan too.

Fact of the matter is, there is nothing indians hate more than their own image in the mirror.
It falsifies almost all of the indoctrination,
 
.
I can see your resistance to accept; and that is not unique
What i shared was a smaller list, you should have done more research on your own; I stopped following indian cinema since 1980s.
Juhi chawla, Raveena Tandon etc have roots in pakistan too.

Fact of the matter is, there is nothing indians hate more than their own image in the mirror.
It falsifies almost all of the indoctrination,
Lol. I am sure there are enough Sindhis and a few Punjabis and Pathans who may have some ancestral link to Pak. Again, they can only represent 5% at most. You are the one who needs to be read up a bit more rather than making absurd claims.
 
.
Lol. I am sure there are enough Sindhis and a few Punjabis and Pathans who may have some ancestral link to Pak. Again, they can only represent 5% at most. You are the one who needs to be read up a bit more rather than making absurd claims.

See the thread's title.
Now come to peace.
 
.
You are saying Afghanistan, Iran and Turkey were put together piece by piece, inch by inch by European colonial empires and these countries' independence is result of colonialists departing?

Colonial powers have in one way or another decided the borders of the modern nations. That's why most of them don't make sense. The borders were drawn to cause conflict and implement divide and rule policies.
 
. .
The Republic of India or Bharat Janagarajya has two principal short names in both official and popular English usage, each of which is historically significant, India and Bharat.
naah. bharat is ur nik at home, like 'chintu'...india(hardy) is your official name.nowhere we see republic of bharat...btw bharat is a folklore..a story from your religious texts .it doesnt have any intrinsic value because its a fable not established history For rest of the world its like shangrila a fictional place from a novel of 1930s Regardless whatever it is you have all the right to keep it as your official name but it deosnt happen even if itss on paper.no one uses the name officially whether its UN or FO activity.
Hinduism is the world's oldest religion, according to many scholars, with roots and customs dating back more than 4,000 years. Today, with about 1000 million followers.

The Vedas / Puranas etc may have got recorder about 4000 years back but the religion is timeless.

All other new religions like Islam or Chrustianity etc took many of the philosophies and ideas from Hinduism, however political distortions made it mashup.
thats laughable at best.
i dont have time to explain you but you can see this recent thread where i teach one of your countrymen about his religion.
 
.
i wouldn’t put too much thought on indias past.

india’s potential for balkanization is more interesting
 
.
naah. bharat is ur nik at home, like 'chintu'...india(hardy) is your official name.nowhere we see republic of bharat...btw bharat is a folklore..a story from your religious texts .it doesnt have any intrinsic value because its a fable not established history For rest of the world its like shangrila a fictional place from a novel of 1930s Regardless whatever it is you have all the right to keep it as your official name but it deosnt happen even if itss on paper.no one uses the name officially whether its UN or FO activity.

thats laughable at best.
i dont have time to explain you but you can see this recent thread where i teach one of your countrymen about his religion.


People who are constrained by ONE BOOK , cannot understand Hinduism. Its like a blind describing an elephant .

You can just laugh..but the way Science caught up with your predecessor Christianity, education will set lot of you free...

Till than, live in your cave.
 
.
naah. bharat is ur nik at home, like 'chintu'...india(hardy) is your official name.nowhere we see republic of bharat...btw bharat is a folklore..a story from your religious texts .it doesnt have any intrinsic value because its a fable not established history For rest of the world its like shangrila a fictional place from a novel of 1930s Regardless whatever it is you have all the right to keep it as your official name but it deosnt happen even if itss on paper.no one uses the name officially whether its UN or FO activity.

thats laughable at best.
i dont have time to explain you but you can see this recent thread where i teach one of your countrymen about his religion.
Bharat Ganrajya is one of our official names. Check this if you need proof - >
https://www.india.gov.in/india-glance/profile
Check the country name section.
A country can have multiple names with varied origins, example Greece is also known as the Hellenic Republic.
As for Hinduism it's accepted as one of the if not the oldest religion in the world. One random keyboard warrior's comment on it won't change reality just because he can't stomach facts :lol:
 
.
Bharat Ganrajya is one of our official names. Check this if you need proof - >
https://www.india.gov.in/india-glance/profile
Check the country name section.
A country can have multiple names with varied origins, example Greece is also known as the Hellenic Republic.
As for Hinduism it's accepted as one of the if not the oldest religion in the world. One random keyboard warrior's comment on it won't change reality just because he can't stomach facts :lol:

thats what i said..its ur nik name at home.
you dont use it outside probably because you are ashamed of it??

Let me destroy ur so-called random gk website with one word
'Animism'

Even Jews believe their religion is older than yours.
 
.
thats what i said..its ur nik name at home.
you dont use it outside probably because you are ashamed of it??

Let me destroy ur so-called random gk website with one word
'Animism'

Even Jews believe their religion is older than yours.

Since there is free flow of abuse against my religion...most ancient...please do chew that...Islam is a religion of camel riders...looters ...if we look at the origin....and it took the philosophy ( whatever good is there) from existing faith...nothing new there..

You guys have no sense of Hinduism and its philosophy. You see so many social evil and equate it to faith. The laws of India has removed social evil and the practice if any is going to disappear in few decades. You cannot say the same thing for a relgion which cannot be reformed due to one book and followers will rather kill than to reform.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom