What's new

Is India the only country that denies it's creation by European colonialists?

You mean other post-colonial countries like Zimbabwe, Tajikstan and Indonesia don't have manuscripts certifying they are not colonial creation but only India does?

You don't want to recognize the British East India Company for all the hard work they have done since 1757?

Our manuscripts are older than any other religions. It gives geographical details of our nation. From cost to cost and hills to hills. These suppressed by Colonial education, is now coming up in public domain beside lots of other scientific discoveries made my them and plagiarized by Newton, Einstein and the likes. As these are being brought in public domain, the awareness and knowledge has an effect, the likes of you and your efforts would be laughped like a kiddo.

I will post it in this very thread when I get time.
Look who is talking. Even word India is stolen from our civilization called Indus valley. The word Indu (people living near Indus river) you guys stole to get your religion ID. Get you fact straight

Ha ha ha

The grand child are talking to grandfather and telling them how to procreate.

These bullshits has now a very short life.
 
. .
Is there any other post-colonial country that suffers from this level of delusion? In Africa or Asia?
You need to distinguish the modern Nation State from the Indic Civilization.
Of course the Republic of India is a direct creation of the British Empire. The whole concept of nation states only emerged in the Napoleonic era. Before that present day India was a patchwork of Kingdoms.

What's there to deny?
 
.
You need to distinguish the modern Nation State from the Indic Civilization.
Of course the Republic of India is a direct creation of the British Empire. The whole concept of nation states only emerged in the Napoleonic era. Before that present day India was a patchwork of Kingdoms.

What's there to deny?
Why is pre indian history associated with india is the question. You have iranian civilization associated with persian, italian with roman etc. heck india even tries to steal pakistan civilization the indus mainly.
 
.
India was never a united Republic. It has historically always been a region of independent Princely States often at war amongst each other. Fact.

The concept nation state is pretty new only started to emerge in 1700s, all modern nation state that current exist previously had been ruled by smaller princely states or feudal Lords for most of their history. Be it England, France, Germany, Italy, China, Japan all of them.
 
.
Look who is talking. Even word India is stolen from our civilization called Indus valley. The word Indu (people living near Indus river) you guys stole to get your religion ID. Get you fact straight

We never even used the terms hindu/sindhu/india forget stealing. It was the ancient Persian and later Greeks used those terms to refer to people in this region.
 
.
Why is pre indian history associated with india is the question. You have iranian civilization associated with persian, italian with roman etc. heck india even tries to steal pakistan civilization the indus mainly.
How is it stealing? The Indus Valley sites like Dholavira and Rakhigarhi are in India. Those like Harappa and Moen jo Daro are in Pakistan. So what are we to do? There will be some overlap between northern states and Nepal. Between West Bengal and Bangladesh. Between Tamil Nadu and Northern Sri Lanka. Between Sikkim and Tibet.
 
.

Thats the geographical breakup west Pakistan at the time of independence. A cluster of more than 35 princely states

Indus valley civilization was an idol worshipping civilization, Hinduism emerged from it.. are you guys idol worshiper?

Mughal Empire was almost 80% in present day India with current Pakistan being its peripheral regions. Capital was always Delhi or Agra or Fatehpuri Sikri, none of which is in Pakistan.

That's why I said Pakistan scores higher on delusion than anyone in South Asia

Tch Tch,
let me put this in perspective by asking you a few questions.

1. Why are a very large majority of indian film stars, actually not from india but what is now pakistan
2. Why is the above trend not prevalent in Tamils ?
 
. . .
Is there any other post-colonial country that suffers from this level of delusion? In Africa or Asia?

If that's the argument..you should thank Pakistan for creation of Bangladesh.

If you are talking of country as a land-mass defined by boundaries then that keep changing.....colonised or not-colonised ...
to your point, India kept changing ....It was Bharat varsh (Mauryan empire) under Ashoka, Hindustan under Mughals and India under Britishers (all these unified so called princely states into a monolith state)....by the way I meant whole Indian subcontinent including Pakistan Bangladesh and some parts of Afghanistan.
 
.
You mean other post-colonial countries like Zimbabwe, Tajikstan and Indonesia don't have manuscripts certifying they are not colonial creation but only India does?

You don't want to recognize the British East India Company for all the hard work they have done since 1757?

In the old time there is Majapahit which area is Today Indonesia and also Malaysia, Philippine, and some part of Thailand.

Indigenous name of Indonesia is Nusantara where even Malaysia acknowledge they are part of it.

Majapahit emerged from East Java and it is also where their capital city is located before miggrate to Bali due to Java Sultanage attack from Central Java.

Unlike India, Indonesia had independence war and we kick Dutch ( which is supported by British ) out of our nation with bloody war

We take Papuan province ( Irian) later which also by force, but Dutch left after we are about to launch biggest marine assault in Asian History
 
Last edited:
.
Malaysia and Pinoy flag comes from Majapahit flag
 
.

Thats the geographical breakup west Pakistan at the time of independence. A cluster of more than 35 princely states

Indus valley civilization was an idol worshipping civilization, Hinduism emerged from it.. are you guys idol worshiper?

Mughal Empire was almost 80% in present day India with current Pakistan being its peripheral regions. Capital was always Delhi or Agra or Fatehpuri Sikri, none of which is in Pakistan.

That's why I said Pakistan scores higher on delusion than anyone in South Asia
During IVC time, God hadn’t sent down a single prophet yet.

By your logic, you do realize the Mughals were a Sunni Islamic, fari & Urdu speaking empire right?

The empire originated outside of India in Central Asia + parts of Pakistan. The capital was based out of Lahore for a time and moved out when it took more land. At its peak it included pretty much all of Pakistan, but in the case of India excludes the South and North East. For India it’s a foreign empire that originated west of the Indus.
 
Last edited:
.
What's there to deny?

What's there to deny? See the madness in quote below.

Our manuscripts are older ... It gives geographical details of our nation. From cost to cost and hills to hills... suppressed by Colonial education, ... plagiarized by Newton, Einstein and the likes...

:crazy:


The grand child are talking to grandfather and telling them how to procreate.

Grandchildren? You think your ancestors produced Pakistanis and Afghans? Have you seen yourself in the mirror? Are you and your wife capable of producing anything that looks aesthetically pleasing?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom