What's new

Is India Restaging ‘Sikkim Saga’ in Bangladesh?

Don't ever imagine unifying with India. It is not going to happen. Annexing Bangladesh is analogous to the example of a man was struck by lightening bitten by a snake.
There are still pro Pakistan jamati elements in Bangladesh who would like their nation's raison d'etre to be hatred towards India. So they come out with some unimaginable imaginations to find a political ground in their country. Both Pakistan and BD have been divorced from India in 1947 on the basis of Islam and if at all they want to reunite with India, they have to first undergo Halala but still India wont be interested in people and territory that it gave up in 1947.
 
. . .
Good heavens..NO !!

Why would India want to annex BD ? What does BD offer which India does not already have in abundance - Exploding Population, problems, infra issues, ... the list is endless. No Thank You.

Furthermore, why would India or any nation for that matter want to alter its demography in one stroke ?!!

No Thank you, BD is best left alone to its devices.

One has got tired of reading such ' damsels in distress' type posts .
 
.
“India is a marginally poor country which is abode to 40% of the poorest and illiterate people of the world who defecate in open fields or roadside, who are deprived of modern amenities,”
Bullet point from the article.:P

Its a "pay attention to me" article in BD media.
This is an article from an obscure website only @MBI Munshi know it's existence.Mainstream media will not publish such a low quality paranoia.

Sikkim was a sparsely populated, resource rich kingdom, and the people were India friendly.
What resource you are talking about in Sikkim? India swallowed Sikkim for security concern.period.

And no,Original Sikkimese were not 'friendly' to Indian occupation.It was the illegal Nepali migrant who spell doom to the Sikkim's existence.
 
Last edited:
.
What resource you are talking about in Sikkim? India swallowed Sikkim for security concern.And no,Original Sikkimese were not 'friendly' to Indian occupation.It was the illegal Nepali migrant who spell doom to the Sikkim's existence.

Being a Bangladeshi you should know the hydel-power resource in Sikkim. Water is a natural resource, a very precious one at that.

Teesta_river_basin_Neeraj_Wagholikar.jpg
 
Last edited:
. .
@asad71 has been saying India will annex Bhutan year after year (it will be next year trust me! etc..).

India has so far "resisted" it....and this author thinks we will suddenly take the jump to BD before Bhutan, Nepal etc.. :P

You are lying here. I have always mentioned of reports that say Bhutan would be annexed in the year 2019 CE. This date is related to Bhutan's domestic politics.

India would like Nepal to merge with india, but BD I don't think so.
Worry not. We will soon acquire Eastern India, incl NE.
 
.
Enough of AL govt selling the country to India. We need a new govt. Lets make Delu razakar the PM. @idune the mayor of Dhaka north. @MBI Munshi the mayor of Dhaka south. @Luffy 500 as the minister of religion. @Al-zakir the minister of culture. The guy who wants to buy nukes from Pakistan @asad71 as the foreign minister. @Saiful Islam as defence minister and @T-Rex as LGRD minister. We can also make Pakistan's president as our own president the same way Queen Elizabeth remains the queen of Australia, Canada etc.
Well played Sir! LOL

Worry not. We will soon acquire Eastern India, incl NE.
Right.:disagree:
 
.
It was the illegal Nepali migrant who spell doom to the Sikkim's existence.
Water is a great resource isn't it?

How exactly Nepali migrants spelled soon to Sikkim, pls tell the story
 
.
Sikkim has already been annexed and digested by India, now what awaits Bhutan's fate is crystal clear .

Immigration from Nepal and India.


Since Bhutan emerged as an independent state, the most significant immigrant groups have been from Nepal and India. These people are collectively called Lhotshampa (meaning "southerner"), though a collective name may present an oversimplification because of the diversity within the group. The first reports of people of Nepalese origin in Bhutan was around 1620, when Shabdrung Ngawang Namgyal commissioned Newar craftsmen from the Kathmandu valley in Nepal to make a silver stupa to contain the ashes of his father Tempa Nima. The Newar are an ethnic group distinct from the Bahuns, Tamangs, Gurungs, Rais that form the Lhotsampa community.

The next small groups of Nepalese emigrated primarily from eastern Nepal under British Indian auspices in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Members of many ethnic groups, including forefathers of Lhotshampa and others from Sikkim, the Assam Duars, and West Bengal, were brought into Bhutan as slaves (the institution was abolished in 1958).

Seasonal migrants commonly worked in the Bhutan Duars, and began to settle in the 1880s. During the late 19th Century, contractors working for the Bhutanese government began to organise the settlement of Nepali-speaking people in uninhabited areas of southern Bhutan in order to open those areas up for cultivation. The south soon became the country's main supplier of food. By 1930, according to British colonial officials, much of the south was under cultivation by a population of Nepali origin that amounted to some 60,000 people.

Settlement in Bhutan of large numbers of people from Nepal happened for the first time in the early 20th century. This settlement was encouraged by the Bhutan House in Kalimpong for the purpose of collecting taxes for the government. In the 1930s, the Bhutan House settled 5,000 families of Nepali workers in Tsirang alone. In the 1940s, the British Political Officer Sir Basil Gould was quoted as saying that when he warned Sir Raja Sonam Topgay Dorji of Bhutan House of the potential danger of allowing so many ethnic Nepalese to settle in southern Bhutan, he replied that "since they were not registered subjects they could be evicted whenever the need arose.

Furthermore, Lhotshampa were forbidden from settling north of the subtropical foothills.
The beginning of Nepalese immigration largely coincided with Bhutan's political development: in 1885, Druk Gyalpo Ugyen Wangchuck consolidated power after a period of civil unrest and cultivated closer ties with the British in India. In 1910, the government of Bhutan signed a treaty with the British in India, granting them control over Bhutan's foreign relations.

Being a Bangladeshi you should know the hydel-power resource in Sikkim. Water is a natural resource, a very precious one at that.

Teesta_river_basin_Neeraj_Wagholikar.jpg
Absolutely correct, that's Indians strategy. By now more than half a dozen Dams have been constructed upstream in Sikkim to block the natural flow of International rivers. Next in line comes Bhutan.
 
.
You are lying here. I have always mentioned of reports that say Bhutan would be annexed in the year 2019 CE. This date is related to Bhutan's domestic politics.
Worry not. We will soon acquire Eastern India, incl NE.

Yes, Indian NE minus Arunachal (NE) is an area which is coveted by BD population. It is because of umbilical cord connection. Many people have migrated to these places in historical times because local population there was scanty and land was vast. Tripura, western Assam and Meghalaya are the prime candidates. Actually, they are suffering because of their unnatural union with Delhi.
 
.
So doing some calculation here. India annexed Sikkim in 1975 and they will annex Bhutan in 2019. 44 years. After the annexation of Bhutan is completed next in line comes Nepal. Since Nepal has a bigger population than Bhutan, it will take like 60 years. So here we are in 2080. Next comes Bangladesh. And since Bangladesh has a much bigger population it will take at least 70 years. And we are in 2150. Oye Munshi and Banglar Bir you've started the fear mongering like a century early. You will be long dead by then.
 
.
Lol no indian will ever want to annex the most densely populated country with no natural resources.. it will only be a burden on other States.
 
.
Yes, Indian NE minus Arunachal (NE) is an area which is coveted by BD population. It is because of umbilical cord connection. Many people have migrated to these places in historical times because local population there was scanty and land was vast. Tripura, western Assam and Meghalaya are the prime candidates. Actually, they are suffering because of their unnatural union with Delhi.
Perhaps Bangladesh is staging a Sikkim saga in India to take over NE and Sikkim :lol:
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom