First of all your reply is full of arrogance
LOLLZ
whose post is full of arrogance one could see from your post
i can challenge anyone here that dassault is a wrong choice.
1)Who said mig-35 = rafale considering rafale costs more than double and mig 35 having liquid cooled aesa,not solid state
then who has posted this post in post no #5 of this thread MY ghost !!
We should have invested in zhuk -ae,ols after ordering mig 35 or have gone for su-35 simply because
2)Can we really afford rafale in this current low growth scenario without the potential tot(all indications point to this )
Who told u that there is no potential ToT for rafale
3)can rafale aesa compete with no50 aesa........no
No50 aesa is for PAK-FA .Now why would u compare pak-fa 's aesa radar with RBE 2 aesa radar
4)no of radars in pakfa= one aesa,,2 side arrays and 2 l band and possibly one on the tail
can rafale counter that
again the same thing why r u comparing PAK-fa with Rafale .
Meanwhile rafale's future upgrades would include extra conformal radar array
5)stealth-better than rafale
Whose stealth PAK -FA or MIg 35 or Su 35
which one plz specify
MIg 35 & Su 35 is inferior to rafale in terms of stealth meanwhile Pakfa is 5th gen fighter meanwhile
Rafale is 4.5 th gen fighter
BTW rafale has Spectra to do that job which stealth does for PAk-FA through active cancellation
tech
For SU 35 or Pak-fa
yes russians have high thrust engines
But what i have told u before plane T/W ratio is more important than thrust of the engine as it
detects manuverabilty for a plane
Meanwhile Rafale's engine has lowest IR signature among all 4th gen fighters .Nowadays every country is having IRST so a plane must have an engine with low IR signature or else it would be detected through IRST even if the plane is stealthy
about su-35
we all know that pakfa systems will eventually come to mki and su-35 so what will be better
a)qwip infrared and aesa equiped su-35
b)rafale
your turn
it 's for remote future at the moment
we would be upgrading SU 30 mki to Super SU 30 status so what's the point of buying SU 35
Why india did a wise thing by upgrading SU 30 mki to Super Su 30 rather than buying Su 35?
1)Indian Super su 30 mki would have a cutting edge Zhuk-AE AESA radar meanwhile Irbis E has a PESA radar & Aesa is always technically superior to a PESA radar though it is expensive
2)Super Su -30 mki upgrades are still classified but what we know from sources along with an Aesa radar it is going to have
a) new cockpit may be larger size display units
b) upgraded mission computers ( probablly new system core)
c) New EW suite equivalent to Su 35's EW suite
d) Advanced Stealth characteristics ( more composites / better Ram coating)
e) Abilty to carry Brahmos ALCM ( certain structural modifications if required)
f) Even foreign weapon's & indigeious weapon integration could also be possible like Meteor ,Brimstone Astra & nirbhay
3)The problem with Flanker derivatives is it's high RCS no matter how they upgrade it .The biggest drawback of flanker derivatives is it's Straight air intake design as it is a big blunder for stealth as they still havent installed a radar blocker in it's engine in SU 35 .So stealth wise both Su 35 & Super Su 30 are going to even & inferior to western 4.5 gen fighters counter part no matter how they boast of reduced RCS.So no point of buying SU 35 rather than why not upgrading Su 30 mki .
4)Russian Su 35 still would have some advantages in performance aspect like higher thrust engines, more range & higher T/W ratio but those advantages are not decisive nor overwhelming in comparision to Super su 30
5)Russia have always known to sold similiar weapons platform to china like SU -30 MkK ,yes the chinese are developing & inducting J11b & j15 but despite all that Russia always find ways to persuade China to buy it's weapons for financial reasons
So why should india buy a platform which has no guarantee that it wont be sold to china .
6)India & Russia are already partners in developing a 5th gen plane (PAK-FA) which is a futuristic fighter designed to meet future aerial threats .SO why waste money on buying a new plane like Su 35 which's capabilty can be matched by upgrading that similiar kind of plane with added features like that of Su 30 mki to Super Su 30 standard
Read the post carefully...........product 117 is for su-35 not mig 35 and don't make jingoistic claims of rafale being the best.Once su-35 gets an aesa and qwip infrared in 3-4 years whats in rafale to counter it??
Oh Boy!
which fool is making jingoistic claims apart from you may be you are this guy with another multiple account here who have trolled in many other indian defence forums
in the name of
Mariner HK
may be u should read this article why MMRCA is important
Sp's Aviation , June 2013:
why MMRCA is important PART1
SP's Aviation June 2013 e-Magazine - SP's Aviation
Sp's Aviation, July 2013:
Why MMRCA, part 2: The balancing act
SP's Aviation July 2013 e-Magazine - SP's Aviation
Sp's Aviation, August 2013:
WHY MMRCA, part 3 : ensuring national security:
SP's Aviation August 2013 e-Magazine - SP's Aviation