Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indians were given 15 years to comply, they chose to give the finger to Hasina.
Yes Indians were asking for it. As usual Indians always over playing their hands. They just never learn, they never do.
Better the qualified scriptwriters, directors, and actors start the production of ads in BD before the housewives organize themselves and start picketing. Even let Kolkata people to come to Dhaka to do the job.If money and ad-revenue stays in Bangladesh - directors, writers and actors will automatically be drawn to Dhaka, yes we can attract even global talent (including from India and Pakistan) to come to Dhaka to improve our content, provided we keep our ad-spend money locally.
Better the qualified scriptwriters, directors, and actors start the production of ads in BD before the housewives organize themselves and start picketing. Even let Kolkata people to come to Dhaka to do the job.
Be it cinema, drama/ theater, or anything cultural, BD people remain a group of peasants/ ক্ষ্যাত just like their forefathers. Like or not for saying, but the reality is we lack culture and we are not that willing to learn better things from others.
Our standard is the Books written by Humayun Ahmed. I bought one of his books probably গল্প সংগ্রহ from a bookstore owned by Mukul the famous Muktijoddha radio narrator. I was unable to find a single story in it. All are the amalgamation of many words and sentences.
It is the only book in my life that I threw into the dustbin in disgust.
I read only a few short stories written by Emdadul Haq Milon. His style is good and his level of language is much higher than that of Humayun. At least he knows the definition of short stories.
I know the names of many of those who contributed to, "Purba Banga Gitika"/ Mymensingh Gitika, or Chuti Khan and Poragol Khan. Everyone appreciates Kaji Nazrul Islam, Mir Musharraf Hussain (Bishad Shindhu), or Syed Mujtaba Ali (Chacha Kahini, Deshe-Bideshe).Well not all writers will meet your taste.
Imdadul Huq Milon and Akhterazzuman Elias were good writers, they are acknowledged in Kolkata too, as are many others in Bangladesh. You have to do some more digging maybe, next time you are in Dhaka, literature in Bangladesh is a largely unappreciated medium, but the new generation is fusing Lalon Fakir songs into newer western forms, so we are in no danger of losing touch with our Loko-songskriti i.e. folk culture.
I would not term the non-matching of our literary culture with Kolkata Nadia-based babu-culture and see our folk-culture termed as "Khat" (uncultured). Alaol was not "khat", nor was Lalon Fakir. These are examples of our popular culture which are honest, unpretentious and marked by their true philosophical genius, though expressed in disarmingly simple words.
Our culture and literature dates back way older than the claimants of this Nadia babu culture. Shah Muhammad Saghir was an early (maybe the first) Muslim Bengali poet in the Sultani Bangla period, at the court of the Sultan of Bengal Ghiyasuddin Azam Shah, He wrote during the 14th century. Of course there were Hindu poets even prior to him, but Kolkata and Nadia was not a center of culture back then, but Sonargaon (Panam Nagar) was, which was the capital of Bengal at that time under Sultan Ghiyasuddin Azam Shah.
Shah Muhammad Saghir:
Shah Muhammad Saghir - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They made 20,000 X 15 - 300,000 crore Taka in fifteen years, and that is just the media ad-spend. Think about the amount of exploitation we are letting these bastards commit. I mean WTF !!
Why won't Bharat be Mahaan? We're subsidizing everything in Bharat....
Thanks Hasina....
Yes and this is why India gets this unpolished bamboo. At least I am happy to see no Chetona crying on the issue.They just believe India is a bigger country with the bigger economy , they should always get the better end of any deal. And the way they look down on Bangladesh that also is a major contributing factor in the way they behave.
No one has found a single script written in prose form before this time. Note that the first Bengali novel Alaler Ghore Dulal was published in 1858 and Anowara was published in 1914.
Urdu was well-developed a few centuries before Bengali was developed. Arabic and Persian languages are well-built and are much older.Unlike West, prose, novels and short stories, came much later, rather centuries after the poetry, even in Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi, Seraiki and Pashto languages.
Thanks for taking the time to post this. I expected the Bangladeshi production quality to be better than the Indian Bengali production. Bangladesh seems to have a higher GDP than West Bengal after all.Language accent is barrier between Bangladeshi and Indian West Bengali contents.
The Bangladeshi accent is more raw and not bookish or standard Bengali. West Bengali accent esp. accent used in Kolkata and adjacent areas are considered standard Bengali language without any type of accent. Talking Urdu with Punjabi accent is what Bangladeshi Bengali accent is.
In TV dramas Bangladeshi contents used to be popular in 90's but now occasionally one or two TV dramas are made content wise otherwise very dull and mediocre production quality.
Indian Bengali channels (Zee Bangla, Star Jalsha and other Bengali channels) are hugely popular in Bangladesh. Their production quality is high much like Hindi serials. Although story is cringe worthy but with lot of dramas and queries / suspense. Bangladesh has huge audience for such dramas or Natoks.
Indian Bengali art house films are popular in Bangladesh but the mainstream commercial masala Indian Bengali films have no audience in Bangladesh.
Bangladeshi films are also very poor in quality. Even worse quality than Pakistani films.
Indian Bengali and Bangladeshi commercial films both are very bad but production wise Indian Bengali films are far superior in quality.
I know the names of many of those who contributed to, "Purba Banga Gitika"/ Mymensingh Gitika, or Chuti Khan and Poragol Khan. Everyone appreciates Kaji Nazrul Islam, Mir Musharraf Hussain (Bishad Shindhu), or Syed Mujtaba Ali (Chacha Kahini, Deshe-Bideshe).
But I was talking about contemporary writers in Bangladesh.
Ghoti Babu or Muslim has no distinction to me when it is arts and literary creations. Does it matter if writers like Bankim, Sharat Chandra, Tarashanker, Shanker, Obodhut, Jajabar, Bimol Mitra, Manik Bandhopddhay, Niharranjan Gupta are/ were Hindu? Important is their literary contributions.
Trade and businesses are linked with our economic welfare, we can distinguish between this Bengal and the other Bengal. But literary works should not be divided between this line or the religious line.
The reality is Muslims of both Bengal have failed to contribute much towards arts and literature after 1947, and the writers of Purba Banga Gitika were not Muslims only. There were many Hindu contributors, as well.
By the way, if you read all those Gitika poems, you will not see any coma, full stop (DarI), colon, the semi-colon ---------. All were added after 5 Hindu Pundits led by Dean Tarkalanker compiled the first comprehensive Bengali grammar sometime after 1805 AD.
No one has found a single script written in prose form before this time. Note that the first Bengali novel Alaler Ghore Dulal was published in 1858 and Anowara was published in 1914.
I have read Anwara but did not notice it was written in 1914. But not many good writers were/ are born in BD. I don't remember many names but there are also good books like, Lalshalu, Uttam Purush, Sareng Bou, Food Conference, Ayena etc.
The worst writer is Humayun Ahmed. But our womenfolk like his light writing style.
They just believe India is a bigger country with the bigger economy , they should always get the better end of any deal. And the way they look down on Bangladesh is also a major contributing factor in the way they behave.
Thanks for taking the time to post this. I expected the Bangladeshi production quality to be better than the Indian Bengali production. Bangladesh seems to have a higher GDP than West Bengal after all.
Reasons aside, the reality is that the Bengali Muslims remain weak in education, arts and culture. It is more true for the people of Bangladesh. This is what the West Bengal people term as Khyat.There are clear reasons for this East Bengal poor showing in literature/academia and I'd have to respectfully disagree that we're "Khat" (i.e. uncultured) in East Bengal.
Rate of secular or literary education in Muslim communities were historically low, even for rich folks as in pre-British times East Bengal was always a prosperous land. People did not need education to go have a job to make money - they could live off the land, selling their produce very easily. This was not the case in WB where life was not as easy as in East Bengal.
Muslims traditionally considered themselves educated if they simply received Arabic Madrassa education, knew a bit of Farsi and had a Quran-e-Hafez certificate from Maqtabs unlike Hindus who went to "tolls" (traditional Hindu schools in Bengal) to get educated in Bengali literature which was an offshoot of Sanskrit and a requirement of understanding Hindu scriptures and religious literature. Old Bengali (Pali) and Sanskrit were and are very close languages.
East Bengali Muslims were rarely interested in studying Sanskrit or Pali literature, it was not expected as an educational qualification in their own communities.
When Mughals faded from the scene, Hindus enthusiastically accepted English education (they wanted to gain advantages over Muslims working under the British. While Muslim Khandan Bengalis in East Bengal 100% resisted working with the British and be part of their administration - as it was a huge change from Mughal administration and the official court language which was Farsi. This was the reason Muslim Bengalis (even upper and upper middle class) fell back in English-based education and Hindu Bengalis dominated in jobs, administration, IPS, science, literature, academia and many other fields, this made their ranks extremely strong during British Raj times, giving rise to Baboo Culture. But that era is over now.
WB today is largely without a significant industrial base, much poorer than Bangladesh and WB's regional also-ran loser status in India will not change anytime soon. Kolkata Baboos have to go to other cities in India to seek jobs. Many other states (like Maharashtra and Gujarat for example) are formulating policy to prevent non-locals being preferred in jobs. So Bengali Baboos outside Kolkata and WB have a "Hatey Hariken" situation...
Although this writing on the wall about being second class Indian citizen, is plain to see, the babu-culture folks and litterateurs in Kolkata have a hard time accepting their lot in life. Their entire WB economy is being controlled by Marathas, Marwaris, Gujju folks and above all Cow Belter Bihar hardliner Sanghis. WB people are just happy to call themselves and be accepted by the less-than-honorable moniker of "Bong" - and they have no interest in preventing the rest of India to exploit WB. They only find solace in calling Bangladeshis uncultured and lower class. But Kolkata Baboo-Culture is not inherently superior from our East Bengali folk-culture. Whatever Kolkata Baboos gained is solely due to patronization of their culture by being the center of the British Raj.
So - my point of saying all this is that the Raj era of wealth (and literary excellence and superiority, which is a by-product of it) is over in West Bengal. It has little to do with us being "Khat" in Bangladesh, or not.
Reasons aside, the reality is that the Bengali Muslims remain weak in education, arts and culture. It is more true for the people of Bangladesh. This is what the West Bengal people term as Khyat.
By the way, there were no geographical entities called East Bengal and West Bengal historically. But, you give too much emphasis on this political division that was created only in 1947.
Shall it not be about the Muslims and Hindus of Bengal and not east Bengali and west Bengali? The terms are fuzzy without real meaning. About 26% of people in west Bengal are Muslims and about 10% of people in Bangladesh are Hindus.
So, both the groups live across the line. And, also note that of the east Pakistan population in 1947, only 70% were Muslims. And this big figure was due to two long wars in the past.
One is the 30-year long war between two forces: Mughal Delhi vs Pathans of Bengal (1576 to 1605). Delhi first conquered Bihar and the western part of Bengal that caused the Muslims from these two areas to flee to the eastern part. Note that Munger in Bihar became the then Mughal Bengal Capital.
The 2nd is the Bengal -Maratha war of 10 years (1741 to 1751) that killed at least 300,000 people in Birbhum, Bankura, Medinipur, and adjacent areas. People, mostly Muslims, migrated to the eastern part of Bengal east of Bhagirathi to save their lives and honor.
So, why do you draw a political line based on the political division of east and west that did not exist before 1947? Things must be said in their proper perspectives. It is Muslims and Hindus of Bengal.
We can divide the line into Hindus of Bengal and Muslims of Bengal. Even eastern Bengal and western Bengal can be accepted, but not East Bengal and West Bengal when talking history.