Sir ji-- by putting B in middle of A and C-- and by looking at the over lapping-- i only understand this-- that B have some characteristics of A and some of C-- and by your representation i can assume the conclusion that-
B is a confused identity in the middle-
as
A = God-
and
C = Anti-God-
so B = God+Anti-God-----
There are two problems here--
1- i do not think atheists are confused- they have firm believe that there is No God-
and
2- the A B and C are maybe unique or independent entries but they are bonded by a chemical attraction in an environment or medium known as religion-
Without Religion- A B or C has no Independence value-
No my friend. You are turning the concept of Set Theory on its head.
A, B and C are not 'fluids' or 'concepts'. A,B and C are sets of human beings.
A human being who happens to believe in God/Religion (A) may doubt these and he/she will fall in (AB)
A human being who doubts the existence of God or doesn't believe it (B) may or may not hate these. If he hates them, he falls in BC while if he doesn't hate them, he falls in B-C (B minus C) and that could include even AB.
A human being who is staunchly anti God will fall in C. If he happens to doubt the existence of God, he will be BC. If he has no doubt in his mind and simply hates God/Religion, he'll be in C-B (C minus B).
Now lemme put this in examples.
Agnostic Muslim here lies in AB. All agnostics lie in AB.
Religious people lie in A-B
Simple atheists lie in B-A-C
Atheists who hate god lie in BC.
Simple god haters lie in C-B.