F5 twin tailed is a competitor to F-18? WTF are smoking? On what specs? Basis? Radar? Thrust? Weapon systems? Jesus you Iranians are so ill informed it's actually surprising. You guys havent made a succesful twin tailed F5 from scratch. Just Old framed refurbished. Old engines being cannibalized. Your twin tailed F-5s are nothing but F-5 offering basic Russian missile system. Those birds are good as F-5 which is nada.
F-16 Block 52 are downgraded? 4500 planes in existence speak for a reason. Your BVR is 1st gen while our's is 3rd or 4th Gen. Yea we know what we talk about. Your Phoenix have an effective range of 50+ km anything more and it is easy to evade, while ours have 120 km+. Leftover my ***.
The drone you pulled down scrambling GPS, seriously i can do it, I have the tools (my firm). Dont act if you took over unencrypted transmission is just something Iran can do. We dont because we have a deal. Drones now are we talking about? What happened to the Airforce? Or are you just out of topics and going to take cheap potshots
You guys are full of yourselves, over nothing but hot air your mulla propaganda machine pumps in to your tv/radio whatever.
it's interesting that people like you try to cover their lack of logic by bringing the mullah word to every discussion.
now I show you who actually is ill informed:
1.the range of Fakour (AIM54) isn't 50km, it's around 200km and if fired from 30000 feet and the enemy fighter is flying in low altitude, this range will increase to 220km, I heard a memory from one of Iraqi pilots that immediately after his take off and while was turning his fighter toward Iran, his plane got hit from nowhere, that's the power of that radar and missile.
2.as I said we produce these weapons ourselves, we can mount them on any aircraft that we wish, not just F-14s, and again referring to western sources about the number of operational aircraft in Iran shows how ill-mannered you are. these sources are the same ones who were saying Iran has 3 or 5 BM launchers, yet recently IRGC decided to humiliate their B.S reports by showing 30 of them in just one parade.
3. you asked what happened to air force? and why I dragged the drones into this field? well, while drones are part of air force and while we are way ahead of you in this field, yet I didn't. I just mentioned about RQ170 incident, the fact is that I talked about the capabilities of our air force in the first place, but since there is no any war to examine our fighters, I used the RQ170 story as a proof for our capability in the radars and electronics warfare. but it seems it was a sensitive and painful story for you.
4.let me know if you found any credible source stating that RQ-170 uses unencrypted communication channel.
5.how do you know if we have used GPS spoofing? besides, we are not talking about a 70 era drone, it's latest American technology, if we wouldn't capture that drone today everyone would say RQ-170 can find it's path even with false GPS signals,
secondly we are talking about military grade encrypted GPS signals, an spy plane with upward looking GPS antennas, flying at 50k feet altitude and in the middle of nowhere, kiddo forget your cell phone GPS. and if still you think you can break into that code, then give its tech to Pakistan and save your people.
6. you said, you let Americans to kill your civilians, women and children because of the deal (what a shameful deal!), yet Pakistan's government complaining about violation of their sovereignty tells us something else.