No photographic evidence, nor any statement by Hezbollah or Iran themselves.
they said they hit Israeli ship with kowsar
Because there's circumstantial evidence to that effect.
thats a new one
The two sets of figures are clearly not identical. Also, I never said I "accept" the zionist source quoted by Palestinian Chronicle. I shared it to prove that zionists contradicted themselves, which goes to punch another hole into the credibility of zionist declarations in general. Declarations you selectively endorse when they suit your agenda, while dismissing them as propaganda when they don't, e.g. Tel Aviv's indirect denials that Iran had a hand in the retaliatory assassination of their veteran scientist.
those data if not look at diferent of 1-2 in the numbers and the participant tank that one said 370 and another said 400 are the same
Bottom is, you deem zionist attempts to cover up their losses to be credible. That onto itself annuls your subsequent conclusions.
what attempt , that was my keyboard didn't type zero
No evidence that Kornets were used in the footage you evoked.
but there is that there was so much kronet that when Hezbollah re-positioned it left many behind
Zero information about the type the missiles which can be seen fired in the video.
as i said its not important when 18 get fired at and only one get destroyed and another one actually was destroyed by an IED. also as i point hezbollah have so much of that missile that they left them behind and deem it unnecessary to take them with themselves while repositioning
Syria did not possess enough Kornets to transfer "hundreds" of them Hezbollah.
but they left them behind , russia had enough , and iran had the money to buy it for them
if it was working then the s-300 were usable and could be deployed but those system never get deployed
No evidence is wasn't functional, no evidence it wasn't incorporated. Moreover, if Iran got her hands on a single example then there would've been no point inducting it. None of this implies however that Iran's R&D in the field of radar technology did not benefit from the study of this radar.
show evidence that it was functional and incorporated in our radar network then
and there was very much reason to use it if it was functional as it would have become one of our most advanced radars at the time as our radars at the time were pretty much lacking for half of our border in persian gulf we didn't had any radar coverage and .....
In other terms, Iran saw benefit in integrating into the IADS every single system she actually integrated therein.
in other term we didn't need them Russia could take them back give us our money plus interest and and fine for not honoring the deal and we could use it two produce 3 time the amount bavar-373
Again, unsubstantiated claim. Iran's own advanced VHF radars went into production years after the acquisition of the Nebo.
but they were different and were not used as part of air defense system but part of our early warning radars .
Many of the older systems are kept in place because they are fulfilling an active niche role within Iran's IADS. Hence why they keep being fielded. Iran's main enemies won't confuse radar types nor be easily fooled by them.
no but they had to hit every single one of them that make their work harder
The Su-30SM does not cost $85 million. Belarus purchased 12 in early 2016 under a deal worth $600 million in total.
so you now demoted the order from su-35 to su-30 ,dr.meson would have a field day compared that useless aircraft with an aircraft with modern subsystem . if su-35 could have a niche role , that airplane even can't play that
The Pahlavi regime lacked sovereignty. Those fighter jets weren't an asset to Iran, they were there to serve US geostrategic goals.
LOL, i'm talking the facility and maintenance line and production line that came with them not the airplane themselves
Look at Hack-Hook's comments, it's staggering. He thinks that if he does not see things, it is that it does not exist. If he does not see the construction of certain things then it does not exist. I've been saying that the Iriaf section has been the worst section of this forum for a long time. There have been things that have been hidden for years by Iranians and tries of planes and drone never for the public.
i say if you don't accept the others have things that you can't see , why i must accept you have things that the others can't see
by the way i don't talk about something you can hide in a sport complex, i'm talking about a very big radar that if it come online any body around us specially usa could detect its signature , i'm talking about a big radar that could have easily picked up from sky by satellites
Iran shows images underground combat aircraft, for me, it's already an old news
that will be a real bad idea
www.timesofisrael.com
