Beny Karachun
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2016
- Messages
- 6,521
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
It's almost as if blue and purple are two wavelengths that are very close to each otherThose are shades of blue. Sorry to offend your god google.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's almost as if blue and purple are two wavelengths that are very close to each otherThose are shades of blue. Sorry to offend your god google.
Its almost as though you cant even read what you post lol. Your PATHETIC google search clearly mentions rain clouds as being the cause of colour change, not the clear sky. So while clouds can appear in varying colours, the sky itself is still blue. Please read what you respond to and what you post unless you want me to take you to the cleaners. Stay in your lane.It's almost as if blue and purple are two wavelengths that are very close to each other
View attachment 872482
That's some stupid nitpicking but okay lol.Its almost as though you cant even read what you post lol. Your PATHETIC google search clearly mentions rain clouds as being the cause of colour change, not the clear sky. So while clouds can appear in varying colours, the sky itself is still blue. Please read what you respond to and what you post unless you want me to take you to the cleaners. Stay in your lane.
I know you probably do, but we dont live in space. On earth, the sky is blue. Not nitpicking, just being accurate. Cope.That's some stupid nitpicking but okay lol.
If you want to be nitpicking, the actual color of the sky is black, it's only blue because the light of other stars is diffusing through the atmosphere. That's why once you're above a certain altitude, it becomes black
View attachment 872483
which camera filter that's pure light , look at the center when there is no cloudThe sky is still blue, using camera filters doesnt change that.
Isn't that just ice loldry water
well actually cold is lack of hot not hot is cold , i'm not like you to grasp at strawshot is actually cold?
sort of , but if you take ice in your hand it still feel wet , that is a lot drierIsn't that just ice lol
the sky can feel blue even from earth and its in detail explained in my previous post , its all on how our eyes detect colors and how light reflection and refraction can play on itI know you probably do, but we dont live in space. On earth, the sky is blue. Not nitpicking, just being accurate. Cope.
Dry simply means solid state, it means the molecules are densely organized. Water becomes dry below 0 degrees Celsius in our atomspheric pressure.nor can you prove that water is dry from a scientific angle either. May Allah guide you.
It's feels wet because of your body heat melting the outer layer as soon as you touch itsort of , but if you take ice in your hand it still feel wet , that is a lot drier
you guys and never looking at the sky , remind me of the movie "Girl with a Pearl Earring" when Vermeer ask Griet , what color is the sky and first she fail first time and he then tell her look again and this time she tell the correct color which is mixture of a lot more colors and then he say to here now you understand.Nobody was talking to you. And no the sky is never purple.
you say they have the capacity of long range detection , then according the rule of discussion , prove itHere's an elementary rule of discussion you are yet to gain mastery of: the burden of proof rests with he who makes an allegation. I provided a compelling piece of circumstantial and rational corroboration, namely that Hezbollah will not induct a missile it cannot fire.
the point is that is the only data availableAre you sure I didn't?
But that's beside the main point. Because fact remains the data you offered is zionist-issued and I amply explained why it's hardly worth a dime.
you see , the correct one is what i post in first post18 + 5 = 21 according to your rules?
I read your post carefully enough, but it appears you yourself have a hard time following what it is you wrote.
1) You never uttered anything about 18 repaired tanks.
2) You clearly stated 18 Merkava MkIV's were hit by ATGM's of which one was destroyed. But you did not specify how many of the 17 remaining ones were retired from the front lines.
show us alternate data that don't claim all the tanks deployed in 2006 were MK-4, considering MK-4 production started in 2004Even if untrustworthy data is the only data available it doesn't cease being untrustworthy and therefore one can't draw far fetched conclusions from it, contrary to what you've been doing.
you can't okay show me any radar on the system we receivedTry grasping nuance as well as simple terms such as aspects (plural).
literally hundreds of atgm there are videos of then on ******** that show hezbollah fighter firing 5-6 missile toward tanks from different angleSeeing how you're not privy to that information, you aren't in a position to tergiversate on it.
so you can't show anything , and expect people believe your claims on faith ?Because every tank hit and damaged by Hezbollah was necessarily retrieved by the latter?
again post your different numbers, preferably not from a source that claim Israel had 400 merkava-mk4 at the timeIn order to put to rest your assertion about the Kornet ATGM, it's enough for me to point to the fact that the numbers you posted are taken from an eminently dubious source.
so you claim israel had the ability to produce more than 200 mk-4 per year at the first year of productionAgain, the figures you posted are irrelevant because they originate from a biased institution subject to military censorship.
The Mk4 specification in the paper I shared could've been a misquote from the author, which is highly unlikely to be the case of the numbers it cites.
If you only bothered to read jeursalem post you had understood that the Palestinian chronicle was not faithful to what it attributed to Jeursalem Post. its Jeursalem post article that tank to internet i could access easilyHad you not stopped at the names of the website and its editors, you'd perhaps have noticed that the paper is referencing its primary source in footnote [10].
Which happens to read as follows:
[10] Yaakov Katz, “IDF report card,” Jerusalem Post (August 24, 2006).
Now I wasn't aware that the "I"DF and Jerusalem Post are "non-zionist" entities. Thanks a bunch for revealing this to me!
Thousands of anti-tank missiles were indeed fired during the 35 days of fighting, but while soldiers told stories of deadly missile attacks on IDF tanks, Commander of the Armored Corps Brig.-Gen. Halutsi Rudoy told The Jerusalem Post that out of the almost 400 tanks that operated in Lebanon, only a few dozen were hit by anti-tank missiles and only 20 were actually penetrated. In total, 40 tanks were damaged and 30 tank crewmen were killed.
oh that not working example that never deployedIran displayed a Nebo radar in a 2010 military parade, as specified in the article I shared.
Here's another one, from 2010:
not working nebo-svu , till today there is no nebu radar deployed in iranI showed a source that reminds us how Iran put on display a Nebo radar in 2010.
I never insinuated Basir is copied from Krasnopol. What I underscored, is that Iran obtained Krasnopol rounds from Russia. There's a difference between these two propositions.
Iran didn't Syrian forces advised by Iranian advisors received themI never insinuated Basir is copied from Krasnopol. What I underscored, is that Iran obtained Krasnopol rounds from Russia. There's a difference between these two propositions.
except that they were used in Syria by SyrianThe third source I provided is explicit about Russian supply of Krasnopol rounds to Iran - not to Syria, not to the NDF, but outside the context of the Syrian war.
no paying milliiards of dollar of needed money for a system but not using them show there is some problem therePutting to use a complex weapons system one doesn't need is a sign of psychopathology, not the opposite.
not no benefit to defence industry and research as at the time we could produce better but benefit to defence as we still use s-75 in form of hq-2 we recieved from china. so why not use the better system we paid forThere's no logic in fielding a weapons system one sees no benefit in. If it's deployed and integrated into the IADS, it implies that Iran is seeing a role for it.
probably again secret contract that i'm not allowed to knew about themIran has signed multiple contracts with Russia since the S-300 delivery and will continue along that path.
okay instead of 4milliard 3 milliard , all the budget to increase iran force capability in all branches of army , irgc, and basij is 4 milliard how much of it assigned to air force , i could not find can you tell me3-4 (twelver squadrons).
the regular air force budget for maintaining current capability and paying wages and ... are separate , those 4 milliard euro is the part that you say most be mobilized independently and is for all of Iran armed force branches and belong to 1401 that it increase , before that it was even lessThese funds will have to be mobilized independently from the regular air force budget. It'd be an extraordinary investment, the type of which is consented to only once in a decade or so.
not years before , it was recieved with if i'm not wrong Croatian s-300 , the system actually didn't work and its what we used in our BavarIran Got AESA Nebo SVU Years before S300, there are video clips from drils where it is used... Also someone posted Pictures of Kasta radar, that radar is old version of Kasta, no one Use it any more I think... now Kasta 2E is used... Iran has Kasta 2E and also introduced own version...Iran has also Vostok E and Gama D and recently domestic Vostok E is introduced...
Nebo SVU
View attachment 872544
Kasta 2E
View attachment 872545
you mean Quds radar that is a improved version of Belarus radarVostok E
come with s-300 after all iran radar development and production of domestic S-Band and X-band radarsGama D
Always nice to see friendly Bosniaks. Much loveNope, Iran Gamma D Long before, and Croatia S300 is BS, you post a lot of BS lately, I dont Know where you Got all this INFO.. I am more or less on different military forums from 2006 and follow Iran military even before, so I Know exactly when and where we discussed about all these radar. In fact Iran recently show domesticly overhuled Gamma D, it came Long before S300. Croatia Got only part of S300, and since I am from Bosnia, I can tell you that Croatia, as Bosnia is US puppet
ThxAlways nice to see friendly Bosniaks. Much love (sorry, no heart emoji in deep blue available)