Arminkh
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2014
- Messages
- 3,036
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
I've been saying it for months. Now that US is shooting the alliance drones down, Iran should shoot down theirs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've been saying it for months. Now that US is shooting the alliance drones down, Iran should shoot down theirs.
I havent seen it flying, i just saw it moving on a runway.So what's your concern !?
Enjoy life ...
Can you name those weapons ?
F-313 is NOT fake because fake can't fly !
Cool down & let me inform you ...
Bringing our AD systems to Syria is a bad idea.I've been saying it for months. Now that US is shooting the alliance drones down, Iran should shoot down theirs.
I havent seen it flying, i just saw it moving on a runway.
I trust only my eyes, not cock-and-bull propaganda storiesWaiting is a safe option for doubters !
Because it's coming soon ...
well , we should use some of them in real battle to see their real performance and weakness ...Bringing our AD systems to Syria is a bad idea.
Waiting is a safe option for doubters !
Because it's coming soon ...
I dont like sentences which have COULD, WOULD, SHOULD in them.well , we should use some of them in real battle to see their real performance and weakness ...
our national security council should declare Qaher project as "Priority National Project" ...
Bringing them to Syria can compromise their codes and make a bigger problem for us, have you ever heard of Operation Rooster 53?well , we should use some of them in real battle to see their real performance and weakness ...
I agree Iran should be careful in displaying its military technology, it takes years to develop but minutes to compromiseBringing them to Syria can compromise their codes and make a bigger problem for us, have you ever heard of Operation Rooster 53?
nope , we should test them against real electernic warfare and then use data to make new system or modify current system ...Bringing them to Syria can compromise their codes and make a bigger problem for us, have you ever heard of Operation Rooster 53?
You'd better search it on the internet, Why do you think IRGC refused to bring them to Syria to test them on real targets? Cause they know if someone get a hand on one of these and analyse it's frequency range and it's progressing algorithms, our whole air defense network is practically out.nope , we should test them against real electernic warfare and then use data to make new system or modify current system ...
a system that can be easily broken , has no use .... so you are saying that if an spy give the information about our system then we are doomed ?!You'd better search it on the internet, Why do you think IRGC refused to bring them to Syria to test them on real targets? Cause they know if someone get a hand on one of these and analyse it's frequency range and it's progressing algorithms, our whole air defense network is practically out.
Every system has it's own weakness.a system that can be easily broken , has no use
If a spy give the source code and frequency range of our radars and we want to rely solely on AD systems to protect our air space, we are doomed, And bringing our AD systems to Syria puts them in the risk of them ending up in Israeli's hands.so you are saying that if an spy give the information about our system then we are doomed ?!
On the contrary to what people think, most of the radar systems are offline, the only radars that are online 24/7 are early warning radars, it's to avoid getting their frequency ranges compromised.i'm sure even right now American's plane are gathering information about our radars frequency range and analysis them ...