What's new

Irate India questions rule of law in China

Show your balls and attack Taiwan and then come here and say things about your neighbor. You just dont have guts nor resources to get Taiwan back

Taiwan is different, we consider them our blood brothers. So we are aiming for peaceful reunification.

Whereas in the Korean War, we were willing to fight the USA + 16 of her allies combined. :azn: And we ended up pushing them entirely out of North Korea.

India meanwhile, loses land to Pakistan (half of Kashmir) then goes and cries to the UN. Then India loses land to China (Aksai Chin) and then goes and cries to America.

India pleaded for US help against China in 1962 - Times Of India

Maybe you should ask them to donate some ammunition to you. :P
 
.
Well written though, right? :azn:

As for the rest, it was the Indian Armed Forces who already admitted they are NO match for China.

That was of course before the revelation that India only has 2 days worth of ammunition. So in fact, they were actually boasting when they said India cannot match China, in fact India can hardly match Pakistan. :P

As we already saw in 2008.

y dont u attack india mate......... come n take the arunachal pradesh and yes dalai lama... and regarding 2008..... if pakistan has the balls it should own the attack and should carry these attacks directly...... war for india is not the option.... any sane country tries to avoid the war..... but yes pakistan is an exception.

Well written though, right? :azn:

As for the rest, it was the Indian Armed Forces who already admitted they are NO match for China.

That was of course before the revelation that India only has 2 days worth of ammunition. So in fact, they were actually boasting when they said India cannot match China, in fact India can hardly match Pakistan. :P

As we already saw in 2008.

y dont u attack india mate......... come n take the arunachal pradesh and yes dalai lama... and regarding 2008..... if pakistan has the balls it should own the attack and should carry these attacks directly...... war for india is not the option.... any sane country tries to avoid the war..... but yes pakistan is an exception.
 
.
And these^^^^ nos do not include logistical vehicles needed to pull off an invasion, which number around 70,000 for IA
and 56,000 for PLA...................How the hell you gonna beat us bro???
 
.
y dont u attack india mate......... come n take the arunachal pradesh and yes dalai lama... and regarding 2008..... if pakistan has the balls it should own the attack and should carry these attacks directly...... war for india is not the option.... any sane country tries to avoid the war..... but yes pakistan is an exception.

Actually, we already took all of Arunachal Pradesh in 1962. It was so easy that the PLA was actually surprised at how far we got. :lol:

India did not win it back by military means. As usual, they pleaded and waited until China withdrew on our own.
 
.
Taiwan is different, we consider them our blood brothers. So we are aiming for peaceful reunification.
nice thought, perhaps that's why taiwan continues to arms itself. the latest being the anti-ship missile.
sell the BS somewhere else, nobody here is buying
 
.
y dont u attack india mate......... come n take the arunachal pradesh and yes dalai lama... and regarding 2008..... if pakistan has the balls it should own the attack and should carry these attacks directly...... war for india is not the option.... any sane country tries to avoid the war..... but yes pakistan is an exception.

y dont u attack india mate......... come n take the arunachal pradesh and yes dalai lama... and regarding 2008..... if pakistan has the balls it should own the attack and should carry these attacks directly...... war for india is not the option.... any sane country tries to avoid the war..... but yes pakistan is an exception.

China can only give warnings to all the countries where Dalai Lama goes.

Poor Monks will be mugged in china if they ever put their feet in china. It is endorsed by the State.
 
.
Actually, we already took all of Arunachal Pradesh in 1962. It was so easy that the PLA was actually surprised at how far we got. :lol:

India did not win it back by military means. As usual, they pleaded and waited until China withdrew on our own.

and what made the mighty chinese withdraw unilaterally in 1962, lack of testicular fortitude?
 
.
How the hell you gonna beat us bro???

LOL, these Indian fanboys think they know more than the Indian Armed Forces. :rofl:

'India cannot match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live

Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Sureesh Mehta has set off a storm by saying India cannot match China military force. Is it a warning from India's military that the government needs to hear?

"In military terms, both conventional and non-conventional, we neither have the capability nor the intention to match China force for force," said Admiral Sureesh Mehta.

For a nuclear-armed military representing the interests of a billion-plus people, the lack of confidence is quite striking. India's military leadership has made a stunning confession that New Delhi doesn't have the stomach for a fight, if push came to shove on the disputed Sino-Indian boundary.

"Whether in terms of GDP, defence spend or any other parameter, the gap between the two is too wide to bridge and is getting wider by the day," he said.

And this was BEFORE the revelation that India has only 2 days worth of ammunition. So in fact the statement above is boasting. :lol:
 
.
.
with even 2 days of Ammo, I dont think China has the balls to attack India...LOL
 
.
Actually, we already took all of Arunachal Pradesh in 1962. It was so easy that the PLA was actually surprised at how far we got. :lol:

India did not win it back by military means. As usual, they pleaded and waited until China withdrew on our own.
Yeah???Sure attacking undermanned outposts and claiming land is very brave and heroic of PLA isn't it ??And at the sight of just 10,000 infantry with few artillery your numerically troops rounded and went back to their claim lines......that was also very smart, wasn't it???
And coincidently just a few hours before the counterattack, Mao decided to withdraw the troops, in a "gesture of goodwill", that's also quite smart isn't it??:lol:
 
. .
LOL, these Indian fanboys think they know more than the Indian Armed Forces. :rofl:

'India cannot match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live



And this was BEFORE the revelation that India has only 2 days worth of ammunition. So in fact the statement above is boasting. :lol:
PLEASE, read the article yourself, before reffering it to me............it says we cannot match you, force to force..........
but we can deter any invasion or expeditionary force you throw at us........Please read my above posts for the "2 day ammunition" thing............

Like I said: "These Indian fanboys think they know more than the Indian Armed Forces."

:P
Ren't actually bothering to read any of the counter arguments are you???? If you had read any of them you would have realised that your statements and the intention behind them has been proved wrong..........
 
.
Like I said: "These Indian fanboys think they know more than the Indian Armed Forces."

:P

there is a concept called minimum credible deterrence. it is the reason why PLA ran back TWICE after 62.
you should get the transcript updated, unless of course the objective is to continue being the PDF drama queen
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom