What's new

Iranian UAVs | News and Discussions

Here is an interesting article from Jassem Al Salami. I don't know what issues he has but you can sense his love for Iran in his every word. He is the same guy who announced the lie about Iran cancelling its space program a few weeks ago so he is not a very reliable source.

Besides BS like Iran have trouble keeping its drones in the sky, he is referring to a new twin engine jet drone.Has anyone ever heard about this drone before? Looks interesting. The picture is a photo from a monitor.

Iran’s New Drone Is a Twin-Engine Bomber — War Is Boring — Medium



upload_2015-2-3_8-58-3.png




by JASSEM AL SALAMI

Every year during the last week of December, the Iranian government celebrates National Research Week. As this is Iran—where there’s a paucity of civilian scientific research—the week is almost completely dedicated to military achievements.

The same was true for 2014’s exhibition. Amid a torrent of propaganda footage, the state-owned Iranian Aviation Industries revealed a new jet-powered drone—one likely designed for combat.

The company didn’t divulge any of the drone’s characteristics or specifications. The only notion of its existence was brief, grainy footage taken during a flight test, a moment of which is seen above.


1*LV1zeQzi1NbITpoqAz5s3Q.png

But the footage reveals a few details about the unmanned aircraft. The drone has twin jet engines—an unusual arrangement for modern drones.
Two engines require additional subsystems to keep the drone airborne, and it makes the aircraft more expensive. The engines have considerable space between them—resembling the central canal on the twin-engine F-14 Tomcat.

This could be extra room for weapons without causing excessive drag on the airframe.

Finally, the drone has very small wings, suggesting that it relies on high speeds and its peculiar shape to produce lift. This feature likely reduces the drone’s flight time, essential for reconnaissance UAVs.


1*8nsROsg79Kyub1vdiN4FtQ.png

Above—a single-engine Karrar drone armed with an HQ-7 air-to-air missile. Mehr News Agency photo. At top—Iran’s new twin-engine drone. Photo via Iranian forums
So if it’s not a surveillance drone, then what is it? Tehran might have designed the vehicle for attack missions—which corresponds with recent trends in the Iranian defense industry toward heavily-armed, fast drones.

Three months ago, Iran introduced several new air-to-air and air-to-ground munitions for its previously-revealed, single-engine Karar drone.

The new weapons included an air-to-air missile based on Chinese HQ-7, which Tehran produces under license. This new, unnamed missile uses a thermal seeker and fewer control surfaces compared to the HQ-7, which uses radio command guidance. The missile has a range between 12 to 20 kilometers and a speed of Mach 2.7.

The other weapon revealed for Karar was the Shafagh air-to-ground missile. With a range of 12 kilometers, Shafagh can penetrate 1,500-millimeters of rolled steel armor.

We previously knew Karar could carry 500-pound guided bombs and two C-705 missiles. While Karar could serve in a multi-role configuration to attack field targets such as light structures and vehicles, the new drone might provide heavy assault capabilities against command-and-control infrastructure and other strategic sites.

Attack drones are a smart choice for a poor country. Iran’s two air forces have proven to be largely ineffective in the ongoing conflict in Iraq.

Compared to manned fighter jets, drones cost a lot less to replace, and they don’t need extensive pilot training and maintenance. Drones can also carry out swarm attacks—launching dozens of networked machines at a single foe—which significantly boosts the chances of success against well-defended strategic targets.


1*JtRxcYO54sY2PSzCjaqDKQ.jpeg

Iranian Mohajer-4B crashed in Deir Al Zour, Syria. Photo via Islamic State propaganda video
But Iran faces substantial technological challenges before it forms an effective attack drone fleet.

Tehran knows how to get them off the ground—but it’s still working on how to keep the machines in the air.
The most important challenge is building secure and sustainable communications systems. As Iran doesn’t have access to satellite networks, it has faced serious problems maintaining contact with its drones.

Some observers report at least 50 medium-sized drone losses in past two years.


1*LV1zeQzi1NbITpoqAz5s3Q.png

To be sure, Iran does successfully use drones, balloons and relay posts. For instance, Iranian drones made reconnaissance flights over the Syrian city of Deir Al Zour, at least 200 kilometers from Iranian operating bases in the country.

But in early January, an Iranian Mohajer-4B drone crashed in Deir Al Zour — a hint the drone’s intermediate relay systems might be unreliable.

The communication challenges are even more crucial in strike missions. The drone has to correctly identify and hit its target—and in some cases, provide post-strike assessments. Unless Iran overcomes its technological challenges, the new drone program will not likely succeed.
 
. . .
This Jassem Al Salami has insider information on Iranian military affairs, however, it's been a while that he has changed his tone. I do not know why but I suggest that the reader should consider his mental condition.
What mental condition?
 
. . .
Here is an interesting article from Jassem Al Salami. I don't know what issues he has but you can sense his love for Iran in his every word. He is the same guy who announced the lie about Iran cancelling its space program a few weeks ago so he is not a very reliable source.

Besides BS like Iran have trouble keeping its drones in the sky, he is referring to a new twin engine jet drone.Has anyone ever heard about this drone before? Looks interesting. The picture is a photo from a monitor.
Useless Photoshop of the karrar
 
. . .
Iran needs to invest in heavy-machine guns, kevlar, RPG, snipers, ATGM, mortars and jeep mounted 20mm guns. Infantry would be the key to fight a defensive war against possible US invasion if it ever takes place. Tanks, Heavy artillery and other big targets would vaporize before American troops land.
 
.
. .
Iran needs to invest in heavy-machine guns, kevlar, RPG, snipers, ATGM, mortars and jeep mounted 20mm guns. Infantry would be the key to fight a defensive war against possible US invasion if it ever takes place. Tanks, Heavy artillery and other big targets would vaporize before American troops land.
There won't be any American troops on the ground in Iran like what you see in Iraq and Afghan. Any possible American or Israeli attack would be limited, what we actually need are SAMs and air defence stuff as well as ballistic missiles to hit enemies bases.
 
. .
There won't be any American troops on the ground in Iran like what you see in Iraq and Afghan. Any possible American or Israeli attack would be limited, what we actually need are SAMs and air defence stuff as well as ballistic missiles to hit enemies bases.

SAMs are a logical and wise choice. But the US air power is simply saying scary. The number of aircraft and their enemy SEAD capabilities are unmatched. Quantity would matter more against US than quality. From Iranian point of view they are doing the smart thing by investing in smaller but numerous FAC for hit and run tactics against US ships. In narrow straits the size of US ships will work against them.

Ballistic missiles would be a very bad idea. The US fights its wars with one hand tied behind its back because of fear of world opinion. US can bomb Iraq like they bombed Germany in WW2. But doing that would make US an international pariah. Even a superpower needs international support.

If Iran attacks US bases or Israel with ballistic missiles then US has every excuse to launch full scale conventional attack.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom