You're just emotional, which is understandable. But you need to think clearly and not emotionally. I am giving you the observation on the facts. My statement on the desperation of the enemy is indeed factual, why else do you think they resort to such attacks? Do you believe these will alter Iran's path to any meaningful degree? Think long term. I have already explained what we need to do to deal with these problems, priority is to strengthen our internal security such as counter-intelligence. For as long as the enemy can penetrate and perform these attacks, they will. Not much else they can do. So to a great degree, the blame falls on our shoulders and that needs to be fixed. If Iran wanted, it could greatly escalate and play right into their hands, but they're not. The enemy is desperate, not Iran. Keep that mind. Your examples of those attacks prove that point, not counter it.
Iran's response must be calculated and pragmatic and not based on notions such as gheirat. If you see geopolitics in such terms then frankly it may be best if you avoid following it otherwise you'll just increase your blood pressure. You should have learned by now that these games are ongoing and Iran's current nature is based around strategic patient . Regardless, like I have already mentioned in my earlier posts, deterrence must be established, but do not sit around expecting rash moves. Are there incompetence in Iran, sure, and I have highlighted those and offered potential solutions.
But I'll re-iterate, for those of you that cannot stand the way these things are played, then simply avoid following them otherwise you'll continue boiling with emotions.
