What's new

Iranian Navy | News and Discussions

.
Should the Iranians put an offer to Russia to buy the Admiral Ushakov Battlecruiser/Missile Cruiser. It is scheduled to be scrapped and the Russians may want it off their hands, they think they left the cores inactive for too long. Iranian shipyards are good at retro-fitting and upgrading ships, this would be a great addition to the Iranian navy.
 
.
Should the Iranians put an offer to Russia to buy the Admiral Ushakov Battlecruiser/Missile Cruiser. It is scheduled to be scrapped and the Russians may want it off their hands, they think they left the cores inactive for too long. Iranian shipyards are good at retro-fitting and upgrading ships, this would be a great addition to the Iranian navy.
no , that Ship is Hazardous , Dangerous and too old to be useful , even Russian Army don't knew what to do with it.
 
.
no , that Ship is Hazardous , Dangerous and too old to be useful , even Russian Army don't knew what to do with it.

Mainly the only reason is it is a nuclear hazard, which is very dangerous. If it just the reactor and there was no radiation leak, and can be cleaned out and replaced with steam turbines, it can be turned into a functional ship. If the nuclear material has spilled out, then it is not useful, except to scrap very carefully, and that would be the Russians responsibility. The better one is the Admiral Lazarev and even the Russians think it would be too difficult to make it sea worthy.

Thanks for the reply.
 
Last edited:
.
Mainly the only reason is it is a nuclear hazard, which is very dangerous. If it just the reactor and there was no radiation leak, and can be cleaned out and replaced with steam turbines, it can be turned into a functional ship. If the nuclear material has spilled out, then it is not useful, except to scrap very carefully, and that would be the Russians responsibility. The better one is the Admiral Lazarev and even the Russians think it would be too difficult to make it sea worthy.

Thanks for the reply.
the ship is too big to be useful with any other propulsion except Nuclear powered otherwise it's range would be limited to less than 2000km
 
. .
the ship is too big to be useful with any other propulsion except Nuclear powered otherwise it's range would be limited to less than 2000km

it could be the flag ship of the Iranian navy. Iran would need more frigates with helicopters to patrol for submarines. And more subs to patrol for submarines. I would guess it would cost 2 billion to refit both considering the cost of the type 055s. Around 1 billion each probably. It could house 50+ anti-ship missiles and another 100+ SAMs. Iran would own the Arabian Sea.
 
Last edited:
.
it could be the flag ship of the Iranian navy. Iran would need more frigates with helicopters to patrol for submarines. And more subs to patrol for submarines. I would guess it would cost 2 billion to refit both considering the cost of the type 055s. Around 1 billion each probably. It could house 100+ anti-ship missiles and another 100+ SAMs. Iran would own the Arabian Sea.
it would spent more time in dry dock than serving tit's purpose and as I said without nuclear propulsion it would be to expensive to operate
 
.
it could be the flag ship of the Iranian navy. Iran would need more frigates with helicopters to patrol for submarines. And more subs to patrol for submarines. I would guess it would cost 2 billion to refit both considering the cost of the type 055s. Around 1 billion each probably. It could house 50+ anti-ship missiles and another 100+ SAMs. Iran would own the Arabian Sea.

So you want Iran to operate a cruiser it has no experience in operating, with Russians systems it has no clue on how they work and without a navy personnel to actually fill that cruiser?

Seems like a terrible idea. Iran’s Navy cannot even pilot a small frigate during a storm.

They need much more training and experience before being given the reigns to any massive battleship.
 
.
22248345769_a0570c9a58_b.jpg

Tarantul1a.jpg

compared to German 1,840 tonnes K130 Braunschweig class corvette we are not that bad.

800px-BRAUNSCHWEIG_3012.JPG


F260-Braunschweig-002.jpg



F 260
FGS Braunschweig (2008)
F 261 FGS Magdeburg (2008)
F 262 FGS Erfurt (2013)
F 263 FGS Oldenburg (2013)
F 264 FGS Ludwigshafen am Rhein (2013)

(5 additional units planned 2019-2023)


Specifications:

Builders:

Blohm+Voss, Hamburg, Germany
Lürssen Werft, Bremen-Vegesack, Germany
Nordseewerke GmbH, Emden, Germany
NOTE: The ships were not built at a single shipyard. Sections were constructed at different locations at the same time and later married together.
The table lists the yard where the keel-laying ceremonies were held.

Displacement:
1840 tons (full load)
Length: 89,12 meters (292 feet 5 inches)
Beam: 13,28 meters (43 ft 7 in)
Draft: 3,4 meters (11 ft 2 in)
Speed: 26 knots (48 km/h)
Range: 4000 NM (7400 km) at 15 knots (28 km/h)
Complement: 65

Propulsion:
DIESEL
2 x
MTU 20V 1163 TB 93 diesel engines
14800 kW (20122 hp)
2 shafts / 2 controllable-pitch propellers

Armament:

1 x
Oto-Melara/OtoBreda 76/62 DP gun (3 inches / 76mm, 62-caliber)

2 x
Rheinmetall/Mauser MLG27 27mm machine gun systems

2 x missile launcher for 4 x RBS-15 Mk.3 SSM missiles
(planned)

2 x
Mk-49 missile launching system for RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missiles (RAM)

Mine laying capability: 2 mine-racks for 34 Mk-12 naval mines

Aviation:
flight deck for Westland Sea Lynx or NH90 helicopter - no hangar
stowage for 2 x Schiebel S-100 Camcopter only

Systems:
Cassidian TRS-3D multifunction passive electronically scanned array (PESA) radar
Navigation Radar
MSSR 2000I IFF system
MIRADOR electro-optical sensors
UL 5000K ESM suite
Link 11 and Link 16 tactical datalink
TKWA/MASS Multi Ammunition Softkill System
 
. . . . . .
Back
Top Bottom