Iranian Ground Forces | News and Equipment

[lydian fall]

 

[SalarHaqq]

Good point.

Shahis and reformists are tacitly cooperating with the Taleban on the PR level by relaying the latters' propaganda in order to misrepresent Iran's relative position in the stand-off ("the IR is weak, it can't even face the Taleban") and thereby blacken the Islamic Republic. It's very visible on this forum as well.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Good point.

Shahis and reformists are tacitly cooperating with the Taleban on the PR level by relaying the latter's propaganda in order to misrepresent Iran's relative position in the stand-off ("the IR is weak, it can't even face the Taleban") and thereby blacken the Islamic Republic. It's very visible on this forum as well.

right good point
hard-line principalist are cooperating with Israel by stating the propaganda that JCPOA was a bad deal

 

[SalarHaqq]

right good point
hard-line principalist are cooperating with Israel by stating the propaganda that JCPOA was a bad deal

Zionists labeled it a "bad deal" because zio-American plan from the outset had been to toughen its terms for Iran and to go on neutralizing Iran's missile power and regional alliance system. Something that reformists and moderates were more than willing to offer them on a silver plate. Rohani publicly expressed "hope" that the nuclear agreement would soon be followed by JCPOA's "II and III". Hence why Obama began violating the JCPOA practically from day one, so as to blackmail Iran into a string of additional concessions. In response to American treachery, reformists echoed Washington's demands and advocated that Iran cede more.

The JCPOA was a slippery slope, an intended (from the zio-American perspective) springboard towards follow-on deals which would have seen Iran part with much of her defensive and power projection ssets. And, reformists as well as moderates in Iran are in line with this agenda, they expressed their readiness to comply with the whole set of requests put forth by the enemy.

Had it not been for an institution called Supreme Leadership (which reformists are attempting either to take over / subvert in futuren or abolish altogether or replace it with a council they would dominate), as well as one called IRGC which keep liberals in check as much as possible, those same liberals would have ceded so much during negotiations that Netanyahu himself would have ended up calling it the best deal in history.

Whereas principlists and revolutionaries criticized the JCPOA for diametrically opposite reasons, namely that it was too unbalanced in favor of the west. Hence why they are now insisting on correcting it accordingly, as a precondition for renewed Iranian compliance with her initial obligations. Zionists are absolutely desperate about Iran's current policy.

So no, reformists are striving to pursue ultimately zio-compatible policies, whilst principlists (for the most part) and revolutionaries go in the opposite direction.

This is the reformist view on Jewish culture and by extension on zionism:

Everything is crystal clear, slogans will not fool people anymore.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Zionists labeled it a "bad deal" because zio-American plan from the outset had been to toughen its terms for Iran and to go on neutralizing Iran's missile power and regional alliance system. Something that reformists and moderates were more than willing to offer them on a silver plate. Rohani publicly expressed "hope" that the nuclear agreement would soon be followed by JCPOA's "II and III". Hence why Obama began violating the JCPOA practically from day one, so as to blackmail Iran into a string of additional concessions. In response to American treachery, reformists echoed Washington's demands and advocated that Iran cede more.

The JCPOA was a slippery slope, an intended (from the zio-American perspective) springboard towards follow-on deals which would have seen Iran part with much of her defensive and power projection ssets. And, reformists as well as moderates in Iran are in line with this agenda, they expressed their readiness to comply with the whole set of requests put forth by the enemy.

Had it not been for an institution called Supreme Leadership (which reformists are attempting either to take over / subvert in futuren or abolish altogether or replace it with a council they would dominate), as well as one called IRGC which keep liberals in check as much as possible, those same liberals would have ceded so much during negotiations that Netanyahu himself would have ended up calling it the best deal in history.

Whereas principlists and revolutionaries criticized the JCPOA for diametrically opposite reasons, namely that it was too unbalanced in favor of the west. Hence why they are now insisting on correcting it accordingly, as a precondition for renewed Iranian compliance with her initial obligations. Zionists are absolutely desperate about Iran's current policy.

So no, reformists are striving to pursue ultimately zio-compatible policies, whilst principlists (for the most part) and revolutionaries go in the opposite direction.

This is the reformist view on Jewish culture and by extension on zionism:

Everything is crystal clear, slogans will not fool people anymore.

hardliners had the same stance as zionist so it seems they get their lecture from the same source
end of discussion

 

[SalarHaqq]

hardliners had the same stance as zionist so it seems they get their lecture from the same source
end of discussion

There's no such thing as "hardliners". That's archetypical zionist vocabulary. And says a lot about he who uses the term in this context.

Zionists made noise in order to have the president of America extort additional concessions from Iran via sanctions. Simultaneously, Jewish supremacist reformists tried to pressure Iran's Supreme Leader in vain hopes of making him give in. Because reformists are a fifth column working in perfect coordination with the zio-American empire.

Revolutionaries for their part advocated the exact opposite. Namely, that Iran stop abiding by her initial commitments so as to secure more favorable terms from the USA after reformists deliberately negotiated that joke of a deal which Washington set out to violate from day one.

That Jewish supremacism and zionism have taken root in reformist circles is a proven fact. Let's hear it in their own words:

"Jewish civilization is superior to western civilization" and "western culture is superior to Iranian culture" says the reformist comprador.

 

[lydian fall]

hardliners had the same stance as zionist so it seems they get their lecture from the same source
end of discussion

You destroyed our country for a decade with JCPOA

Now SU

 

[SalarHaqq]

You destroyed our country for a decade with JCPOA

Now SU

What do you expect from someone who openly declares it's "fine" to receive payments from Isra"el" and the USA in exchange for work against the Iranian government?

Reformists are salty that Rohani wasn't permitted to give away Iran's missiles and regional allies to the zionists, whom reformists consider as "culturally superior" to Iranians.

 

[HGV]

You destroyed our country for a decade with JCPOA

Now SU

You mean the same JCPOA that Khamenei and SNSC approved and that Raisi tried to bring back to life not long ago? What is your alternative solution to closing Iran's nuclear file at the UNSC? The JCPOA was objectively a great deal to extricate Iran from a terrible position, and that's why it was supported by the IRI establishment. They still support the JCPOA and will probably enter a new deal by 2025, by the way.

 

[Hack-Hook]

You destroyed our country for a decade with JCPOA

Now SU

and you are working on reviving it , go read the news . by the way the deal was not in effect for 2 years from where that 10 years come
and as i said all of Islamic republic of Iran governing and legislative and ...... branches agreed to it

What do you expect from someone who openly declares it's "fine" to receive payments from Isra"el" and the USA in exchange for work against the Iranian government?

Reformists are salty that Rohani wasn't permitted to give away Iran's missiles and regional allies to the zionists, whom reformists consider as "culturally superior" to Iranians.

expect nothing better from a guy who openly declare my feweling and cambridge dictionary is above the law of our country

 

[lydian fall]

Ukrainian tanks destroy like butter by Iran's Dehlavieh missiles in Russian army:

Iranian Dehlavieh missiles can destroy the most advanced tanks in the world including Abrams and Merkava

Russians and Iranians used these missiles in Syria an Iraq against ISIL

 

[sha ah]

This is all nonsense. It's not up to the Shahis or reformists to respond. Realistically It's up to Raesi & ultimately Khamenei to make a move here. Let's see if they actually have the balls to pull the trigger & put the Taliban in their place. Based on Khamenei's prior track record though, I honestly doubt it.

I'm actually skeptical as to whether Iran will even receive the water thats owed. They basically invaded Iranian territory. If Iran had strong leadership, the Taliban never would have even thought about doing something like this. Reza Khan would have smoked them a long time ago & received reparations on top of it.

Even Khomeini, despite all his flaws, I'm sure would have acted decisively against nobodys like the Taliban. Khamenei though seems to lack the testicular fortitude.

right good point
hard-line principalist are cooperating with Israel by stating the propaganda that JCPOA was a bad deal

 

[jauk]

This is all nonsense. It's not up to the Shahis or reformists to respond. Realistically It's up to Raesi & ultimately Khamenei to make a move here. Let's see if they actually have the balls to pull the trigger & put the Taliban in their place. Based on Khamenei's prior track record though, I honestly doubt it.

I'm actually skeptical as to whether Iran will even receive the water thats owed. They basically invaded Iranian territory. If Iran had strong leadership, the Taliban never would have even thought about doing something like this. Reza Khan would have smoked them a long time ago & received reparations on top of it.

Even Khomeini, despite all his flaws, I'm sure would have acted decisively against nobodys like the Taliban. Khamenei though seems to lack the testicular fortitude.

Why do you hate Iranians so much? Trying to be a friend .

 

[drmeson]

I give zero shits about politics, I care for Iran be it Shahi or IRI. The need of the hour is that we put the Taliban into their place before the pedos start a front on the east. We need to take a stand otherwise the IRI persona of toughness will be shattered and then the Azerbaycan rep, Turkey, Israel, Taliban, and Persian Gulf Arabs will be up our ***. This is no time for weakness, leadership needs to wake up before there will be another repeat of Saddam's invasion of Khuzestan.

 

[HGV]

Reza Khan would have smoked them a long time ago & received reparations on top of it.

Even Khomeini, despite all his flaws, I'm sure would have acted decisively against nobodys like the Taliban. Khamenei though seems to lack the testicular fortitude.

I agree with you about Khamenei but you really need to look into how the Iranian military performed under Reza Shah (hint: very badly)