Saif al-Arab
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2015
- Messages
- 8,873
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
This hostility is good for Iraq, likewise Iraqi hostility with the KRG had very good results as I always hoped for. The more hostility the better so that these mullahs of ours can be declared hostile by the populace and state. Iraqis are being bashed by Iran for not being thankful for some crates of ammo they sold which we needed due to Maliki (the in Iranian exile retard with no brain) destroying the military during his rule.
It would be of great sight to see a military coup in Iraq overthrowing this failed systemm however the Hezbollah militias complicate such an action. Iran's strategy of spawning 20+ militia forces under different leaders is clear, decentralize the state so that it will be weak and easy to influence, hostile.
I think it's time to return to the good old days and restore the good ba'ath party, like the ba'ath party Iran supports in Syria.
Waiting for my Nigerian friend to tell me i'm delusional living in a dream world.
Here on PDF the Iranian Mullah supporters (almost every Iranian user, even those that live in the West) are living in their own little fantasy world where not only Shia Arabs but Arabs from Palestine to Yemen, are in love with their failed regime. The regime that most local Iranians curse in the real world due to 40 years of misery (by large) as well.
Everywhere where Mullah regime influence is found in the Arab world, there is mostly only misery, poverty, instability, weak state institutions, mafia rule (Mullah rule and not just 1 Mullah like in Iran but tons of different Mullah's). Some examples are tiny Southern Lebanon, 2-3 villages in Bahrain, certain neighborhoods, cities and areas in Iraq (although luckily nowhere as bad as under Al-Maliki as millions of people have woken up due to experiencing the ground realities of Iraq and the "great job" that those pro-Mullah regime Iraqi "politicians" and Mullah's have done for the country and their people) and the few Houthi controlled areas of Yemen.
Anyway it does not take a genius to figure out that a strong and stable Iraq is not in the interests of Iran. Regardless of which regime rules it. Iraq is their only gate to the Middle East, Western Asia proper, key strategic areas like the Red Sea, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe and Africa.
I mean the only other areas of note that they can have any remote influence in, is landlocked, small and perpetual failed/unstable Afghanistan, even more irrelevant tiny Tajikistan (that has a 10 times smaller economy than Dubai alone) and similarly tiny Azerbaijan, which is under Russian influence and where the likes of Turkey have a much bigger say as well, not to say that it is not an important entity compared to the areas that can be reached if influence in Iraq is established like post 2003.
Notice that since recorded history, Iraq's failures, are associated with the eastern neighbor who mostly always looked westward since it appeared in history 2500 years ago. Appeared/became relevant after defeating the Assyrian Empire, which previously suffered from civil unrest and numerous regional wars in the 2-3 centuries prior to that event. Not even going to mention the Islamic conquest that freed Iraq and before that (almost starting from 300 BC) the independent Arab and Semitic kingdoms in the South (Lakhmids, Characene)) and West (Hatra) etc.
Iraq was a strong state and a well-to-do state in the modern era as well when Iran (Shah) had no power to meddle in Iraq other than supporting some stateless mountain goats in the North that were dealt with.
BTW we both know that most Iraqis (especially the older/middle age generation that remembers all those conflicts since 1979) and even the youth born after 2003 but not only, are nationalists by heart and naturally align themselves with fellow Arabs and wish for such regional Arab cooperation as the educated lot know their history and that of the region and know who the real "enemies" are. "Enemies" here being those in power abroad (foreign countries) in the region and their ambitions, not necessarily the average person in those countries (for example Iran and Turkey) that have no say in what the likes of Khamenei or Erdogan are daydreaming about.
Interestingly both those leaders are wannabe Arabs by large and very obsessed about internal affairs in the Arab world. Khamenei claims Arab ancestry (paternal), has an Arab surname, speaks fluent Arabic, addresses Arab youth almost every day on his Arabic Twitter (lol) and the other guy Erdogan, is married with an Turkish Arab and also speaks decent Arabic and is obsessed about affairs in the Arab world. Pathetic but not strange given that the Arab world is the historical heavyweight in this region and the economic, geographic, population size, potential, history, in terms of Islam (heavyweight by default since the beginning and until the end) so the obsession is understandable somewhat.
If not for woe-torn states such as Iraq and Syria, those two entities, would have zero influence, like prior to those conflicts. Only locals and world powers (USA and to an extend Russia) allowed those two regional entities, to even have a say in Syria and Iraq. Although they will claim something else here on PDF and trash talk Iraq and Syria like seen in this thread already.
So the solution is at the hands of the Arab youth to restore regional sanity and how it was for most of recorded history. BTW that is also what is going to happen once again.
Last edited: