IR first and most important job is to improve IRANIAN living conditions control inflation and increase living standard ... something that has not been done so far .... instead of blowing trumpet from its big mouth try to understand that to be fertile you need to form your family and to do that you need to provide basic needs .... IR instead of providing theses basic needs insists that people bring more offspring ... how?
See, this is where you are off the mark. Healthy demographic dynamics are not a consequence of successful economic development nor of wealth accumulation: they are a prerequisite to the latter.
So I can only reiterate, rather than reproducing incorrect clichés please read the comments shared in a previous post of mine: their author is a user who studied the topic at the academic level.
Also you seemingly refused to take into account a simple but key fact I recalled. Namely, that countries with the highest material living standards such as Japan, south Korea, Germany and other nations of the north, happen to have some of the lowest fertility rates in the world. Ponder this in order to understand that increasing wealth will not boost fertility.
One MP told young people live in suburbs and come to the Tehran for your job ... is he aware of rent prices? how much a person income would be to pay for rent, daily taxi or metro fare to come to the city and work, food and ... ?
It's off topic. Also I showed how in developed countries of Europe, larger proportions of citizens are forced to live in suburbs than in major Iranian agglomerations. But you chose to ignore it for some reason.
About 60~65% of Iranian were in middle class until 2010 which has become almost 30% right now, it means 30% increase in poor class ...
When it comes to subjects like these I don't take utterances of hostile regimes or their local footmen in Iran seriously.
The data isn't factual at any rate: the free fall of fertility in Iran started in the 1980's i.e. not in 2010 but some 25 years earlier. It could have been contained if adequate action had immediately been taken. Instead, the Hashemi administration went into overdrive conducting denatalist policies.
these people see their income shrunk with no future how you expect them to think of child?
A cursory observation of history and world affairs will generally indicate that the less well off people are, the more they will tend to think of generating offspring.
Do you believe average living standards of Iranians were higher in the 1950's, when the fertility rate exceeded 7, in other words more than four times its present value? Are you perhaps of the opinion that living standards in Niger, one of the most poverty-stricken countries on earth, are superior to those of Iranians, and that this is why Niger's fertility rate stands at more than 6,5 children per female as opposed to Iran's suicidal 1,7?
Therefore you need to revise your approach from ground up, demographic workings are literally opposite to your assumptions in fact.
what I see is IR has lost its hope for better economy so see Immigrants a chance ..
Not really. What happened is that liberal administrations (which I understand you support?) deliberately made sure to ruin birth rates in Iran by implementing the most extreme denatalist measures conceivable.
immigration happen in all countries ,
It doesn't. There are significant differences between countries in this regard.
the point is what we do to direct it towards our interests ... what I see is open borders with no control ...
That's a myth peddled by hostile foreign powers, their oppositionist clients in exile as well as their domestic relays in Iran, using their massive propaganda apparatus.
Many in Europe are criticizing their own governments on similar grounds - and they are usually anything but liberal. Isn't it bizarre how in Iran, liberals are spearheading the anti-migrant incitement? And no, it's not due to them being somehow super patriotic, which they definitely aren't considering their globalist persuasions. Food for critical thought right there.
What we're dealing with is a form of collective psychosis being engineered exactly like the school girls affair some months ago, which turned out to be wholly unrelated to any poisoning but was a textbook case of mass psychotic illness (MPI).
As underscored, the monolithic migration of Afghans into Iran has really nothing in common with what European countries have been experiencing.
The moment you witness what it's like when around 60% of your city's inhabitants hail literally from the world's four corners, with more than 150 nationalities originating from across the West / South / Central / East Asia, Africa, the Americas, from northern / southern / eastern / western Europe itself and coexist in the densely packed urban space, and when about half the indigenous population are grey haired and barely able to walk, then you will know what the type of mass immigration which truly puts at risk national and religious identity actually consists of.
But that you will not be able to observe in Tehran, nor in Esfahan nor in Mashhad. You'd need to take a trip to Brussels, Amsterdam, London, Paris, Frankfurt on the Main, Stockholm etc - any western and central European city really will do, including medium sized and small towns, even villages in many instances, while southern Europe and then eastern Europe are increasingly aligning on this norm as well. Be my guest and let me introduce you to the other side of the west, one which reformist media and counter-revolutionary Telegram accounts do not want you to discover.
a while ago some 20 Afghan were arrested for holding "Ali Koshon" ceremony ... are they civilizationally close to Iran? were they questioned at borders?
There are people in Iran who do the same, they're a small minority in terms of percentage but it makes them far more numerous than twenty. Some time ago they even found a way to hold it inside Firuz' shrine although the public is barred from entry into the latter. There are also individuals in Iran breaching the Supreme Leader's fatwa and performing
qame zani practically every year during Ashura.
And whether we like it or not, these deviationists at the individual human level are members of our civilizational realm. Backed and manipulated by hostile foreign powers for sure, but still Iranians - albeit misled ones when it comes to this matter.
Same applies to our Shia Moslem brothers from Afghanistan, a great majority of whom do not adhere to the sectarianism of 'British turbans'.
به گزارش خبرگزاری برنا از سیستان و بلوچستان ، سرهنگ حسینعلی فراهی اظهارداشت: مرزداران هنگ مرزی سراوان طی ۴۸ گذشته حین پایش منطقه موفق شدند ۶۷۸ نفر از اتباع غیرمجاز را که بدون توجه به محدوده حریم ممنوعه مرزی قصد ورود به عمق خاک کشور داشتند شناسایی و دستگیر کنند.
فرمانده قرارگاه منطقهای جنوب شرق نیروی زمینی ارتش، بیان کرد: امروز با تحت کنترلگرفتن هنگهای مرزبانی زابل و زاهدان در منطقه، استقرار تیپ ۱۵۸ را در منطقه داریم که تا امروز نزدیک به ۵۰ هزار نفر دستگیری مترددین غیر مجاز مرزی را در نوار مرزی داشتهایم که آنها را به یگان مرزبانی تحویل دادهایم.
Well this just contradicts your previous suggestion that nothing's being done to contain the inflow.
changing demography of a nation has serious security consequences social disruption ... and base on which law? did they ask people? just making a decision and implementining it?
1) Demographic regression has far heftier consequences. It is synonymous with economic meltdown. Ask the south Koreans who spent in excess of 200 billion USD to try and reverse their subpar fertility to no avail.
2) The national and religious integrity of European nations is being altered, not Iran's.
This is how a nation's cultural character is uprooted. And this is exactly what the liberals you're listening to want for Iran. Hence their theatrical whining about Afghan immigration, since Afghans settling in Iran is nothing like the above depicted reality, it's like Austrians or Swiss Germans moving to Germany. Do you realize how greatly relieved anti-migration Germans would be if this were the case?
Don't let these charlatans fool you, you're smarter than that.
The head of Seda and Sima is appointed by Supreme Leader, failure regrading BBC Farsi or Manoto is on him ... he must take responsibility, no news conference, no responsiblty , no power to change him ... this is not healthy.
For many years, the Supreme Leader had been calling on decision makers to conduct proper natalist policies but liberals did the opposite. There's no way one can obfuscate or sugarcoat the role liberals played in bringing about current demographic conditions in Iran.
Everyone's responsible for their own actions as well. If some people are foolish enough to let the BBC and Manoto dictate their lifestyle, then the consequences are on them too.
Also patriots have a responsibility towards their nation, or they should stop considering themselves as such. If you do not wish to act upon yours, then I don't know, maybe it'd be fair to tone down the nagging one tiny notch (no disrespect intended).
www.yahoo.com
