moral of the story at those times we at least made some answer to the enemy provocation , right know we follow examples of Imam Hasan while boasting we follow the path of Imam Hosein .
its the difference between Raesi government and Roohani Government
The difference is that with the current administration, Iran will strike the enemy either way whenever warranted, and not just in response to provocations. Such as in 2022 when the Mossad compound in Arbil was reduced to rubble by the IRGC's powerful missile forces. Such as the deadly UAV strike on USA occupation troops by Iranian-aligned forces in Syria recently.
When it comes to the two IRGC troops martyred in Syria lately, this occurred just a few days ago. Give it a couple of weeks, passing judgement earlier would not be adequate.
More importantly though, the Rohani cabinet cannot be credited with any military operation conducted by the IRGC during his mandate. This was an administration which opposed Iran's intervention in Syria and set new records in attempting to appease the USA regime. It publicly spoke ill of Sepah, and we all remember the leaked Zarif's leaked interview in which he was lamenting the fact that sardar Soleimani added a significant layer of ground action to Iranian policy.
So when it comes to this, blatant inversion of reality may achieve to fool a person of utmost naivety but not anybody else.
However and as usual, this is a deflection from the subject matter. Which is that you've abundantly made clear following convictions of yours, as demonstrated by the quotes I shared:
1) You are of the belief, shared by myself, that Avi-Har Even the veteran zionist rocket scientist was eliminated as a result of covert Iranian retaliation for shahid Fakhrizadeh's assassination. Mind you, certain users had gone out of their way these days to label said event as a fictitious "phantom operation" imagined by IRGC commanders. That the same users would now applaud your comments in which you're pointing to exactly that same operation and characterizing it as a fully genuine one, is rather peculiar, would you not say? Reasonable people definitely would.
But what matters here, is that you and I both agree Iran was behind the senior zionist scholar's liquidation, contrary to what has been claimed here over the past couple of days. And you and I are also in agreement that our beloved IRGC officials, therefore, did not publish disinformation in this regard.
That's all I needed to show, so thanks for your effective if involuntary contribution to the cause.
2) Unlike users I've been discussing with during the past couple of days, you do not adhere to the viewpoint that Iranian retaliation to the martyrdom of IRGC forces in Syria should have taken the shape of massive escalatory measures such as multiple missile and drone strikes on zionist mainland. In particular, you deemed satisfactory the Iranian missile launch towards Occupied Golan which I myself had referenced while countering certain narratives on here, but which was derided by another participant as, I quote, "pathetic".
I am glad to have proven with concrete evidence that such commentary is incompatible with your perspective. Again, great job confirming what I've been reminding here for the past few days.
3) Exactly as I've been insisting - which earned me repeated jabs from several members, you just corroborated that Iran has effectively been responding to zionist provocations. Good work, nothing more to add.
4) Much like yours truly, you have a history of highlighting the fact that actual Iranian fatalities - not massively magnified zionist lies to that effect, have been overly rare in Syria. And while we're at it, I'm sure you'll be every bit as pleased as myself to learn that I am going to illustrate soon how diligently you strove to drive home this important aspect, through countless posts you made. So stay tuned!
Since circumstances are calling for it now more than before - and not merely because I have personally been targeted and insulted for conveying that same truth, I'm confident you won't mind if I show everyone what you've been writing on the issue.
