What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

Iranian children’s series Golden Books returns to stores after 58 years

4307447.jpg


TEHRAN – Golden Books, a series published in Iran for children 58 years ago, have returned to bookstores across the country to delight new generations.

The Amir Kabir Publishing Company first published the collection comprising about 80 great classics of the world’s literature with front covers in gold.

The streamlined stories attracted Iranian children at that time and even appealed to adults.

Now, a leading Iranian publisher led by the translator Mohammadreza Jafari, has recently published 16 books of the series, including “Treasure Island” by Robert Louis Stevenson, “The Prince and the Pauper” by Mark Twain, “Moby-Dick” by Herman Melville and the fairy tales “Snow-White and Rose-Red” and “The Brave Little Tailor”.

In a press release published by the publisher, Jafari said that like Iranian adult readers, he is also interested in reading children’s books.

“I have read most of the children’s books written or translated into Persian, and for a long time, I wanted to provide some books for people in my generation and my child friends,” he added.
 
.
is this NATO's retaliation on Iran for supporting Russia in the Ukraine war? ISIS is a NATO/US project afterall, it attacks US enemies mostly, like Tehran in 2017, and Assad, the Shiite govt in Iraq years ago, etc. smh!

IRGC action against ISIS in Afghanistan, Iraq Syria will probably happen.
 
.
Nerds during our school time :

Teacher : exam cancelled
Nerd 1 : starts crying
Nerd 2 :coursing teacher silently
Me :👀


"Nerds" nowadays:

cancelled their classes in "Sharif University"
WE WANT TO DINE WITH THE GIRLS🙄
some may say , these are not the nerds but the student who used Quotas and بند پ
 
.
This attack was specifically conducted by ISIS-K from Afghanistan. Iran should not hesitate to annihilate ISIS positions with drone strikes.

is this NATO's retaliation on Iran for supporting Russia in the Ukraine war? ISIS is a NATO/US project afterall, it attacks US enemies mostly, like Tehran in 2017, and Assad, the Shiite govt in Iraq years ago, etc. smh!

IRGC action against ISIS in Afghanistan, Iraq Syria will probably happen.
 
. .
Russia may not be able to deploy its airforce freely over Ukraine, however they have a significant amount of artillery and firepower. Artillery/rockets and kamikaze/strike drones, especially when directed by surveillance drones can get the job done imo. The biggest issue hampering the Russian military right now is their lack of manpower. In Ukraine they are outnumbered atleast 3 to 1, in some instances 5 to 1 or more. An army on the offensive is supposed to outnumber the enemy 3 to 1 atleast, the Russians, despite being outnumbered have shown that they can even conduct successful offensives, which proves that their military is not incompetent or incapable.

Remember this is a high intensity conflict. Both sides are incurring losses, but even in the Kharkiv offensive, Ukraine lost 5 soldiers for every 1 Russian soldier killed. Currently Ukraine is on the 9th round of conscription. Increasingly we see women and elderly men joining the ranks. Ukraine's methods are simply not sustainable. They don't have an endless supply of men and weapons. In terms of weaponry and supplies, Ukraine is 100% reliant on the west now.

In the long run, Russia is preserving their military as much as possible. Sure Russia has lost a significant amount of men and equipment, but it's simply nothing compared to Ukraine's losses. People don't realize this but since the Kharkiv offensive, Ukraine never stopped pushing forward. Since then, this entire time they have been throwing everything they have at Russia, especially because the weather is becoming increasingly cold and wet.

Ukraine has at most another month, if that, to take territory. This will not be an easy winter for the Ukrainians and they'll be lucky if Russia doesn't launch a major offensive during the winter. In any case, when the Russians deploy their mobilized personnel, Ukraine will be in a very precarious situation. Just in the Kherson region, Ukraine in the last month has sustained thousands of casualties and hundreds of armored vehicles and tanks destroyed. Look I'm not saying that the exchange is completely one sided, but in the long run, Ukraine's methods are unsustainable and in a total war, Ukraine can't win against Russia.

Think about it Ukraine is on the 9th round of mobilization and half of their vital infrastructure has been destroyed. Russia is on the first round of a partial mobilization and already the Ukrainians are shaking in their boots. They claim to be shooting down 80% of Iranian drones, yet realistically we hear about Shahed strikes every day or other day and if Ukraine is so successful then why do they keep begging the west and Israel specifically for air defenses. Also why is the west making such a ruckus over Iranian drones if they're so ineffective. Dozens of nations are supporting Ukraine. You have one nation helping out Russia and the western nations are having a panic attack.

Actually it does work. Syrian civil war is proof of that. Terrorists like Al-Shishani were notorious from throwing men at an objective like cannon fodder till SAA either ran out of ammo or were overwhelmed. Losses ment nothing to them. Just look at how many men ISIS was willing to lose in Kobane. Tens of thousands.

So when you don’t have constant close air support like Russia doesn’t have in Ukraine, throwing men at an objective works.

Russian military on the ground is basically at SAA level right now. It needs to go thru the growing pains of modernizing it’s tactics and purging it’s corps of incompetent officers
 
. . . . .
نمیدونم به ستاره شناسی و پیشبینی آینده براساس ستارگان اعتقاددارین یا نه(چیزی که شاهان در گذشته ازش استفاده می کردن).من ۳ساله پیکاسکورودنبال می کنم.مطالبش برام جالبه.خواستم به اشتراک بزارم..
 
. . .
Is everyone getting a popup/slider here (see attached) or did I somehow pick up a virus? @waz
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2022-10-27 131442.jpg
    Screenshot 2022-10-27 131442.jpg
    54.8 KB · Views: 21
.
Russia may not be able to deploy its airforce freely over Ukraine, however they have a significant amount of artillery and firepower. Artillery/rockets and kamikaze/strike drones, especially when directed by surveillance drones can get the job done imo. The biggest issue hampering the Russian military right now is their lack of manpower. In Ukraine they are outnumbered atleast 3 to 1, in some instances 5 to 1 or more. An army on the offensive is supposed to outnumber the enemy 3 to 1 atleast, the Russians, despite being outnumbered have shown that they can even conduct successful offensives, which proves that their military is not incompetent or incapable.

Remember this is a high intensity conflict. Both sides are incurring losses, but even in the Kharkiv offensive, Ukraine lost 5 soldiers for every 1 Russian soldier killed. Currently Ukraine is on the 9th round of conscription. Increasingly we see women and elderly men joining the ranks. Ukraine's methods are simply not sustainable. They don't have an endless supply of men and weapons. In terms of weaponry and supplies, Ukraine is 100% reliant on the west now.

In the long run, Russia is preserving their military as much as possible. Sure Russia has lost a significant amount of men and equipment, but it's simply nothing compared to Ukraine's losses. People don't realize this but since the Kharkiv offensive, Ukraine never stopped pushing forward. Since then, this entire time they have been throwing everything they have at Russia, especially because the weather is becoming increasingly cold and wet.

Ukraine has at most another month, if that, to take territory. This will not be an easy winter for the Ukrainians and they'll be lucky if Russia doesn't launch a major offensive during the winter. In any case, when the Russians deploy their mobilized personnel, Ukraine will be in a very precarious situation. Just in the Kherson region, Ukraine in the last month has sustained thousands of casualties and hundreds of armored vehicles and tanks destroyed. Look I'm not saying that the exchange is completely one sided, but in the long run, Ukraine's methods are unsustainable and in a total war, Ukraine can't win against Russia.

Think about it Ukraine is on the 9th round of mobilization and half of their vital infrastructure has been destroyed. Russia is on the first round of a partial mobilization and already the Ukrainians are shaking in their boots. They claim to be shooting down 80% of Iranian drones, yet realistically we hear about Shahed strikes every day or other day and if Ukraine is so successful then why do they keep begging the west and Israel specifically for air defenses. Also why is the west making such a ruckus over Iranian drones if they're so ineffective. Dozens of nations are supporting Ukraine. You have one nation helping out Russia and the western nations are having a panic attack.

No offense but your entire analysis of this war being super pro-Russia has been relatively wrong.

I was ridiculed on here for my pessimistic take while you went the complete other direction. In the end it looks like my take was closer to reality, whereas yours seems to be some Kremlin propaganda coping mechanism.

Ukraine is willing to fight to every last man, Russia is not. History has shown us that patriotism and love for the motherland is a key factor in wars. Iraq 2003 - most of the military dissolved in face of US invasion. But Iraq 1980’s the military fought Iran tooth and nail (albeit with tons of foreign aid and support).

The issue with Russia extends beyond fancy weapons and goes into the basic essence of war —which is do your troops believe what they are fighting for. I don’t think the average Russian troop can clearly dictate what they are even fighting for. The problem starts here then you add in logistics problems, poor officer Corps, antiquated tactics, incompetence military brass, etc.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom