But we have bigger problems. This gashte ershad thugs should be chained if they cause rift and protests while our borders are being threatened by enemies. We've no time for this nonsense bro.
Zero blunders is unfortunately an unrealistic goal for any law enforcement agency. What we can say with certainty though, is that blunders are far more infrequent in Iran compared to numerous western so-called "democracies", and this says a lot.
As for the enemy exploiting some citizens' (mostly the culturally westernized) dissatisfaction with modesty laws, we can be sure that they'll find something else to exploit if Iran lifts hejab regulations.
We need to ponder the fact that the only reasons why some are having issues with the current dress code are:
1) Western and globalist cultural onslaught, facilitated by the extreme tolerance authorities are showing for banned satellite TV receivers, by the constant delaying of the national internet project calling for a complete disconnection of Iran from unwanted websites etc. The relentless cultural soft war waged on the Iranian nation has consisted of: propaganda, psy-ops and most perfidiously, social engineering.
In other terms, any rift in Iranian society concerning the hejab issue was generated by the enemy in the first place, namely because it's the enemy which engineered opposition to hejab laws in Iranian society. Look at the early years of the Islamic Revolution: public modesty regulations used to enjoy near unanimous approval from the Iranian people. So what happened? Did their Aryan "genetic heritage" suddenly activate, causing them to reject "Islamic rules imported from Arabia"? Let's be serious, that's nonsense. What happened, is that Iranian culture was tampered with by the enemy and its Hollywoodism, its advertising of American lifestyles etc.
An enemy which can do this, be absolutely certain it will also be able to artificially create new demands among the culturally uprooted segments of Iranian society for ever increasing social-cultural liberalism, and this in turn will lead to new rifts if and once the Islamic Republic allows females to lift the hejab in public spaces. Some assume that in such an eventuality, Iranians who now are susceptible to the enemy's propaganda, will suddenly become content and will then unite behind the Islamic Republic and Velayat.
This is because those who think this way, are projecting onto the mass of Iranians their own preferences in terms of social-cultural norms - preferences which boil down to a form of secular conservatism (no compulsory hejab in public, tolerance for nightclubs, alcohol and premarital intimate relations, but opposition to LGBTism, to generalized abortionism, to the destruction of the family structure, to inversion of the authority of the father, and to legalization of narcotics other than alcohol). And in this, they are very deeply mistaken.
Once you open the floodgates of the sort of cultural liberalism which globalist oligarchs are imposing on nations, there's no turning back. If the IR allows
bi-hejabi in public, liberal-minded Iranians will definitely not stop there, they will gradually press for more and more, all the way to same-sex marriage and so on, guided and supported by the enemy with its virtually infinite media resources. And, this will therefore not deprive the enemy of the cultural instrument it is using to create issues in Iranian society.
2) Social modernization, rise of female higher education, rise of female workforce. You can't have these and expect traditional norms of society to remain fully intact, it's just not possible when at the same time you're permitting western(-sponsored) media to be freely accessible. In that sense, and I'm immensely regretful for having to say this, but the project for an Islamic modernity advocated by the likes of our beloved teacher, shahid Mottahari and others, whereby we can enter a different type of modernity, one that doesn't suppose us to compromise on our religion (nor on its political role) because Islam unlike the Christianity of the Church does not hinder scientific progress, has failed. Mind you, we would have succeeded in this endeavour if it wasn't for the enemy's colossal cultural aggression, it's social engineering, it's soft cultural war, or if we had barren access to satellite TV channels and questionable websites. But authorities chose otherwise. And having it both ways is simply not feasible.
On a sidenote, I grin when I read inoperative comparisons between the divorce rate under the ousted monarchy and now, because when the majority of the population cannot read and write, when up to 80% live in conservative rural areas (small villages essentially), when you have very little university students and their overwhelming majority happen to be males, it's only natural that the divorce rate will stay low, in other terms it's not really a feat; conversely, when these social features experience a reversal, then divorce will inevitably tend to rise as well.
So the solution, other than enforcing the ban on satellite dishes and launching a national internet free of corrupt content, resides in taking a break from this tendential drive towards assimilation of the respective social functions of males and females. Maybe it's high time for authorities to start creating greater incentives for female Iranians to raise their children and focus on their households rather than being pressured to enter the cut-throat capitalist job market, and so on.
